Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
Avatar
Added by judmac1 on 13 Jun 2012 07:41
102743 Views 59 Comments
157
vote

When IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes disagree

Sort by: Showing 1-50 of 65
Decade: Rating: List Type:
People who added this item 1525 Average listal rating (1019 ratings) 7.4 IMDB Rating 7.8
Rotten Tomatoes: 17%
IMDb: 7.8

Difference- 61

I have recently added this to the list under the suggestion of Leo, having never seen the film myself. But if ever there was a split opinion between the two sites- this has got to be one of the biggest!


People who added this item 1662 Average listal rating (1027 ratings) 7 IMDB Rating 7.6
Seven Pounds (2008)
Rotten Tomatoes: 26%
IMDb: 7.5

Difference- 49

This is one heck of a difference! Seven Pounds was not a bad film, and is obviously a favourite among audiences. Critics on the other hand have mostly panned this film, calling it grim and illogical. Now HERE is a division of opinion!

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1196 Average listal rating (835 ratings) 6.8 IMDB Rating 7.4
Rotten Tomatoes: 25%
IMDb: 7.2

Difference- 47

Though not on the high scale of IMDb ratings, there is nevertheless a massive difference between this site and the opinions of critics on the Rotten Tomatoes sight. Critics really don't seem to like Gerard Butler films. Thanks to Leo for this pick up.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 4642 Average listal rating (3074 ratings) 7.1 IMDB Rating 7.6
Rotten Tomatoes: 33%
IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 44

Another classic difference, thanks to King Stefou. While the critics may have found the plot farfetched and rediculous, that didn't stop audiences from ignoring science and enjoying it for what is was- pure entertainment.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1963 Average listal rating (1212 ratings) 7.4 IMDB Rating 7.6
I Am Sam (2002)
Rotten Tomatoes: 34%
IMDb: 7.4

Difference- 40

I have not seen this film, but I believe that some critics thought that Sean Penn's performance was a little too over the top for their liking. Audiences are more sensitive towards family issues though, I believe. Thanks to moviewatcher122 for the suggestion.

People who added this item 2116 Average listal rating (1453 ratings) 7.1 IMDB Rating 7.4
Equilibrium (2002)
Rotten Tomatoes: 37%
IMDb: 7.6

Difference- 39

A popular sci-fi movie with audiences, Equilibrium obviously featured the adrenaline rush that audiences were looking for. It didn't, however, deliver as well for critics, who saw it as a re-hash of better sci-fi films. Thanks to Leo for this inclusion!



judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1881 Average listal rating (1264 ratings) 7.3 IMDB Rating 7.7
Man on Fire (2004)
Rotten Tomatoes: 38%
IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 39

I have not seen this movie, but according to audiences it is possibly as epic as its movie poster looks! 7.7 is no low score on imdb. I've noticed that a lot of Dakota Fanning films happen to be on this half of the list...interesting. Thanks to meuisviocm for this suggestion!

People who added this item 1381 Average listal rating (945 ratings) 6.4 IMDB Rating 7
Rambo (2008)
Rotten Tomatoes: 37%
IMDb: 7.1

Difference- 34

Thanks to AVPGuyver21 for this one! So the imdb rating of this movie is not all that high, but considering it scored very lowly on Rotten Tomatoes it was worth a mention. To be honest, I didn't think that 'Rambo' was all that exciting, but this is one odd film where I can understand and appreciate both people who loved it and people who hated it.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1833 Average listal rating (1147 ratings) 6.9 IMDB Rating 7.4
Rotten Tomatoes: 40%
IMDb: 7.4

Difference- 34

Suggestion by: Hyana Brain

People who added this item 4221 Average listal rating (2905 ratings) 6.9 IMDB Rating 7.6
Saw (2004)
Rotten Tomatoes: 48%
IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 29

The next largest difference goes to Indie-horror film 'Saw', that is, before the massive franchise. Audiences seemed to love this original gore-fest, which really wasn't THAT gory, especially in comparison to its sequels. The critics disagreed though, and Saw's "Rotten" rating on Rotten Tomatoes only proves that critics were too squeamish for this one.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 3542 Average listal rating (2277 ratings) 7.5 IMDB Rating 7.8
Rotten Tomatoes: 52%
IMDb: 7.9

Difference- 27

Now here is an interesting one! We have a schmaltzy Nicholas Sparks adaptation which, I think I can fairly say, is likely to raise eyebrows. What is unusual about 'The Notebook' is that it is the only film adaptation of a Nicholas Sparks novel that actually scored even REASONABLY well (let alone VERY highly). However, I actually can understand the hype from audiences. It is a very sweet film. But critics were not as touched as audiences were, and perhaps this can be blamed on an otherwise manipulative run of bad Nicholas Spark adaptations from both before and after this film was released. I am ashamed to say that I overlooked this inclusion myself, but thanks to Max the Movie Kid for refreshing my memory and bringing it up in the comments!

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2064 Average listal rating (1401 ratings) 7.2 IMDB Rating 7.7
Rotten Tomatoes: 51%
IMDb: 7.8

Difference- 27

To be honest, I had not even heard of this film until Leo pointed out this difference for me. However, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to be a typical camp action film that audiences fell for while critics felt less enthusiastic. Oh wait. It stars Morgan Freeman. Ahhh thats why audiences loved it.

Rotten Tomatoes: 51%
IMDb: 7.6

Difference- 25

I have not seen this film, but it clearly divided audiences and critics. Apparently the film lacked character development, but obviously still had enough visual appeal, and Johnny Depp, to please audiences on IMDb. Thanks again to DragonPhoenix for this input.

People who added this item 190 Average listal rating (105 ratings) 6.9 IMDB Rating 7.1
Rotten Tomatoes: 50%
IMDb: 7.4

Difference- 24

Suggestion by: Max the movie kid

People who added this item 899 Average listal rating (519 ratings) 7.6 IMDB Rating 7.6
Rotten Tomatoes: 55%
IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 22

Suggestion by: martyrofevil

People who added this item 2454 Average listal rating (1649 ratings) 7.3 IMDB Rating 7.8
Taken (2008)
Rotten Tomatoes: 58%
IMDb: 7.9

Difference- 21

While it is the 13th film on the list, I believe that this is one of the most significant films featured here. Mainly because I have not heard of a single person who has NOT liked 'Taken'. In truth, when a crappy sequel comes out, it does seem to discredit the previous film, but 'Taken' still seems to be an audience favourite. To be honest I was surprised to see the film score so lowly on Rotten Tomatoes. Yes, it is a bit implausible, but its also very thrilling (and isn't that the whole point of the movie?). I have to thank AVPGuyver21 and Acey for this suggestion.

judmac1's rating:
Rotten Tomatoes: 54%
IMDb: 7.3

Difference- 19

Okay so I said in the description that I would only include films that did VERY well on one of the websites, and while 7.3 isn't EXCELLENT, I thought I had to include this film to represent the franchise. It made SO much money, was really very funny, and audiences really liked it! However, for the critics, it was really muddled and ROTTEN.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 3091 Average listal rating (1970 ratings) 7.4 IMDB Rating 8
Blood Diamond (2006)
Rotten Tomatoes: 62%
IMDb: 8.0

Difference- 18

I loved this film. So it makes me cringe seeing how low it scored on Rotten Tomatoes. Come on critics! It had everything going for it! At least the audience on IMDb had more sense. 8.0's don't come around too often.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 5260 Average listal rating (3747 ratings) 7.2 IMDB Rating 7.6
300 (2007)
Rotten Tomatoes: 59%
IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 18

A visually spectacular film, even if it was a little brainless. Audiences connected to it anyway though, for pure entertainment (and awesome one-liners), and though it stayed 'Fresh' for a while on Rotten Tomatoes, it ultimately ended up in 'Rotten' territory with a teasing 59%. Perhaps for some critics the film really was a dine in hell.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1801 Average listal rating (1223 ratings) 6.4 IMDB Rating 7.1
Rotten Tomatoes: 56%
IMDb: 7.3

Difference- 17

Suggestion: AVPGuyver21

In the eyes of critics 'Man of Steel' was perhaps too cliched and too serious to rank among the best superhero movies. It didn't have the fantastic writing of Christopher Nolan's 'Batman' trilogy, or the light humour of the Marvel's Avengers franchise, and yet the IMDb viewers obviously found something they enjoyed in the movie, giving it a generous 7.3 rating perhaps simply for its popcorn visual effects and likeable leads.

People who added this item 2885 Average listal rating (1786 ratings) 7.6 IMDB Rating 7.8
Rotten Tomatoes: 64%
IMDb: 8.1

Difference- 17

We got this one right, I believe. 'The Hobbit' received so much criticism upon its release, being compared to and criticised against the 'Lord of the Rings' franchise. But Peter Jackson said himself, this is not Lord of the Rings. There is a lighter tone, it is more colourful (both in script and visually), and it is not as epic as the Lord of the Rings, it is simply an adventure film. Sure, it's long and somewhat similar in plot to 'The Fellowship of the Ring', but I along with what I'm sure are fellow fans of the classic Rings trilogy found a lot to like here, and it's bound to only get better.

People who added this item 9415 Average listal rating (6928 ratings) 7.9 IMDB Rating 8.8
Rotten Tomatoes: 71%
IMDb: 8.7

Difference- 16

8.7 on IMDb! Wow! The film may be the 26th highest film on the website, and it won the Oscar for 'Best Picture', but its 71% on Rotten Tomatoes isn't all that impressive. Neither, in my opinion, is this film. Sorry fellow audience, I have to agree with the critics on this one!

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 3697 Average listal rating (2473 ratings) 7 IMDB Rating 7.7
Rotten Tomatoes: 65%
IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 12

Maybe having an American as the lead in a film called 'The Last Samurai' angered critics, but there's no denying this film has a sense of atmosphere and spirituality. I thought it was great, as did my fellow audience members.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 3550 Average listal rating (2456 ratings) 7.2 IMDB Rating 7.6
Watchmen (2009)
Rotten Tomatoes: 65%

IMDb: 7.7

Difference- 12

The exact same scores as 'The Last Samurai'! How's that! Well this is the second Zach Snyder film on this list, so it's clear that he's popular with his audience, even if the critics don't connect as well with his films. And come on, 'Watchmen' was pretty sick.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 3083 Average listal rating (2004 ratings) 7.3 IMDB Rating 8
Rotten Tomatoes: 66%
IMDb: 7.8

Difference- 12

Another film with Will Smith in the lead on this list. Audiences seem to love him! And critics...well they don't HATE his movies, but lets just say they're not so enthusiastic. This is no exception.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 4324 Average listal rating (2904 ratings) 7.7 IMDB Rating 8.2
Rotten Tomatoes: 69%
IMDb: 8.0

Difference- 11

Another film I'm so happy is on this list. Critics should be ashamed of themselves, but they probably all already knew the twist ending. Martin Scorsese creates incredible atmosphere and suspense in this intense thriller, and the audience, including me, fell for it.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 7237 Average listal rating (5063 ratings) 7.7 IMDB Rating 8.2
Rotten Tomatoes: 73%
IMDb: 8.2

Difference- 9

One of the few films on this list that I haven't seen, 8.2 is a pretty damn high score on IMDb! But that 73% on Rotten Tomatoes isn't too impressive. A noteable difference there.

People who added this item 4237 Average listal rating (2776 ratings) 7.4 IMDB Rating 7.6
Rotten Tomatoes: 67%
IMDb: 7.5

Like Christian Bale's performance or not, this is a captivating film. The audience seemed to enjoy the terror, though the feelings of critics were generally lukewarm.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1898 Average listal rating (1191 ratings) 4.8 IMDB Rating 5.4
Spy Kids (2001)
NOW we get to the films that scored highly on Rotten Tomatoes, but weren't as popular with the IMDb raters. There are plenty of these, but none with as great a margain as...Spy Kids!

Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
IMDb: 5.5

Difference- 38

The movie that pretty much defines this list. Critics seemed to love 'Spy Kids' back in 2001, but it's obvious that audiences did NOT agree on this one!

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 306 Average listal rating (199 ratings) 6.6 IMDB Rating 6.7
Rotten Tomatoes: 97%
IMDb: 6.7

Difference- 30

An unfortunate Australian film that, through its hype, did not live up to expected standards. Which is a shame, because really its a very effective horror film with an excellent lead performance.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2655 Average listal rating (1702 ratings) 6 IMDB Rating 6.5
Antz (1998)
Rotten Tomatoes: 95%
IMDb: 6.7

Difference- 28

Extremely popular with critics when it was first released, 'Antz' turned out to be a disappointment for audiences.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2832 Average listal rating (1770 ratings) 5.5 IMDB Rating 6.1
Freaky Friday (2003)
Rotten Tomatoes: 88%
IMDb: 6.2

Difference- 26

The reason that 'Freaky Friday' now probably rates so low with audiences is because of Lindsay Lohan's lack of popularity. The film itself is not that bad, perhaps not deserving an 88% score on Rotten Tomatoes, but not that bad. The IMDb raters seem to have different ideas though.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2957 Average listal rating (1803 ratings) 6 IMDB Rating 6.8
Babe (1995)
Rotten Tomatoes: 98%
IMDb: 7.0

Difference- 28

To be honest, I think this one's a bit sad. Being an Aussie myself.. :) ..I loved this film as a kid and still do. Critics ADORED it, but perhaps it didn't connect with the American audience? I'm not sure why, but that's a hefty difference!

judmac1's rating:
Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
IMDb: 6.7

Difference- 26

Nawww come on IMDb! This couldn't even scrape the 7.0 mark? I am a sucker for stop-motion animation films. I find the work that goes into making them absolutely fascinating. But, (and this is actually a recurring theme here), stop-motion animation does NOT tend to score highly on IMDb! 'Chicken Run', 'The Pirates!' and 'Paranorman' are all examples of stop-motion animation that deserve to be a lot higher than they get on IMDb! I'm sorry, I have to agree with the critics on this one. The story and the animation are excellent. Thanks AVPGuyver21 for this suggestion!

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1647 Average listal rating (1116 ratings) 6.2 IMDB Rating 6.5
Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
IMDb: 6.8

Difference- 25

Strangely, an exceptionally high scoring horror film, Drag me to Hell was loved by the critics, who perhaps created too much hype for the film. Therefore, by the time audiences saw it, they probably watched it and thought 'So? You've panned every other horror film in existence! How's this REALLY that different?'.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 3159 Average listal rating (2116 ratings) 5.8 IMDB Rating 6.5
Rotten Tomatoes: 87%
IMDb: 6.3

Difference- 24

Suggestion: AVPGuyver21

People who added this item 2011 Average listal rating (1200 ratings) 5.9 IMDB Rating 6.5
Rotten Tomatoes: 85%
IMDb: 6.1

Difference- 24

Another family film, starring Lindsay Lohan, that critics really enjoyed, and audiences...not so much. Although to be honest I thought that this was a fun film when I was younger. Perhaps it worked for its target audience, but keep in mind that young kids probably don't rate on IMDb.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2738 Average listal rating (1814 ratings) 6.3 IMDB Rating 7.1
Rotten Tomatoes: 96%
IMDb: 7.2

Difference- 24

Now while 7.2 isn't neccessarily a BAD score on IMDb, compared to its massive critical acclaim, it's a curious difference. I'm with the critics on this one. How is this not one of the funniest animations ever made? Ahhh well..

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 654 Average listal rating (465 ratings) 6.7 IMDB Rating 6.6
Rotten Tomatoes: 90%
IMDb: 6.7

Difference- 23

The harsh reality is...if foreign films (this is British), receive acclaim from international AND American critics, American audiences tend to judge them MUCH more harshly. I also find that this is the case with a lot of Australian films, most predominantly 'Animal Kingdom'.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1164 Average listal rating (769 ratings) 6.9 IMDB Rating 7.1
The Host (2006)
Rotten Tomatoes: 92%
IMDb: 7.0

Difference- 22

I was surprised that audiences didn't connect to this film as I thought they would. Critics were drawn in by the realism and wonderful special effects in the film- and usually this is an attraction for audiences. Apparently not this time.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1565 Average listal rating (945 ratings) 6.2 IMDB Rating 6.6
Hairspray (2007)
Rotten Tomatoes: 91%
IMDb: 6.9

Difference- 22

Critics were overjoyed with the bopiness and fun of 'Hairspray', but musicals with big casts aren't too popular with IMDb voters (see also Chicago and Mamma Mia!). Personally, I don't think they get the credit they deserve from audiences. Thank goodness for critics then! :P

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1505 Average listal rating (1002 ratings) 6.5 IMDB Rating 6.8
Rotten Tomatoes: 90%
IMDb: 6.9

Difference- 21

Ok, now here's a film that probably was blown out of proportion. Yes, it was very funny, but just like the horror genre, I sometimes think 'Critics, you loved this one so much, how did you not find *insert list of extensive good but underrated comedies such as 'Anchorman' and 'Dodgeball'* funny???'

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 4310 Average listal rating (2932 ratings) 6.6 IMDB Rating 7.1
Rotten Tomatoes: 92%
IMDb: 7.1

Difference- 21

Not a huge popular hit for audiences. Jack Black gives a good performance, and maybe this was the reason that critics fell for it.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 419 Average listal rating (269 ratings) 6.9 IMDB Rating 7.1
Rotten Tomatoes: 92%
IMDb: 7.1

Difference- 21

Another Aardman Studios film! Poor Aardman, I still like your films! Well, to be honest, 'Arthur Christmas' didn't neccessarily score BADLY with IMDb raters, but it received pretty massive acclaim last year! Once again, hype probably ruined it for many.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2421 Average listal rating (1525 ratings) 6.6 IMDB Rating 7.1
About a Boy (2002)
Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
IMDb: 7.2

Difference- 21

Touching and well acted, 'About a Boy' works well but the comedic moments take away a lot of the drama. Critics still admired it- well, loved it- but audiences might have found it a bit sugary in the end.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 288 Average listal rating (182 ratings) 7 IMDB Rating 7.1
Win Win (2011)
Rotten Tomatoes: 94%
IMDb: 7.3

Difference- 21

Audiences didn't seem to mind this, with a fairly solid 7.3 rating, but compared to its 94% Rotten Tomatoes rating, there seems to be a gap in the popularity.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 1280 Average listal rating (794 ratings) 6.7 IMDB Rating 7
Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
IMDb: 7.2

Difference- 21

This 'Best Picture' nominee was certainly unconventional, and split critics and audiences. Most critics thought it was great fun, clever and very emotional, while audiences may have been wondering WHY exactly it was doing so well, with a pretty standard 7.2 imdb rating for such a critically acclaimed film.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 836 Average listal rating (599 ratings) 6.4 IMDB Rating 6.8
Unstoppable (2010)
Rotten Tomatoes: 86%
IMDb: 6.8

Difference- 20

You just look at that movie poster with its bright colours and trashy-action look about it like a 'Fast and Furious' or 'Transporter' poster, and you think this is going to be a dud. Maybe to some audience members it was, but critics (and I) loved the blood-pumping action and intensity of this film!

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 4542 Average listal rating (3023 ratings) 6.6 IMDB Rating 7.2
A Bug's Life (1998)
Rotten Tomatoes: 92%
IMDb: 7.2

Difference- 20

What?!?! A Pixar film? Yes a Pixar film! Audiences weren't too chuffed about this 1998 installment, being the lowest scoring Pixar film on IMDb (do you count Cars 2? Ok, second lowest then), while still scoring a solid 92% and impressing critics on Rotten Tomatoes.

judmac1's rating:
People who added this item 2420 Average listal rating (1535 ratings) 6.5 IMDB Rating 7
Enchanted (2007)
Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
IMDb: 7.3

Difference- 20

We can see with this addition that family films that the critics love go wasted on audiences. It's probably because they see the high Rotten Tomatoes rating, therefore see the film, and treat it as simply a film for kids. Their low IMDb is kind of retalliation for the film scoring higher than some of their favourite action films. Thanks to DragonPheonix for this one.



judmac1's rating:
Load more items (15 more in this list)

I like to think of IMDb.com as the 'People's site' and Rotten Tomatoes.com as the 'Critic's site'. I agree, and disagree, with both. It's therefore interesting comparing the two, and seeing when the People, and Critics, disagree the most. Therefore, from purely my own research (so I will have missed a few, feel free to point them out), this is my list of biggest rating differences of films from the two websites.
Firstly, I have those films that scored HIGHLY on IMDb, but not as highly on Rotten Tomatoes (these are more rare), followed by those films that scored highly on Rotten Tomatoes, but lower on IMDb.
NOTE that I am not including films that scored badly on BOTH websites eg. Transformers 2 received such a low Rotten Tomatoes score that OF COURSE the imdb score was higher. This is not interesting. The film has to have done well on one the two websites. Enjoy :) ...and give feedback!

Added to

90 votes
SwornShadow's Favorite Lists :D (472 lists)
list by SwornShadow
Published 10 years, 5 months ago 13 comments
2 votes
Yovita's Favorite Lists (25 lists)
list by Yovita
Published 10 years ago 1 comment
1 votes
My favorite list on listal (6 lists)
list by AVPGuyver21
Published 9 years, 11 months ago
25 votes
My fav list(20) (100 lists)
list by to2
Published 10 years, 2 months ago 3 comments



Related lists

Music...Work of..2pac,Tupac,Makaveli Discog Filmog
52 item list by Dj Levels
13 votes
My Anime List
8 item list by Peter
18 votes 1 comment
Tony Awards 2015
78 item list by IsabellaSilentRose
9 votes 2 comments
Happy Birthday! - Louis Jourdan
21 item list by Moon River
18 votes 1 comment
Rotten on Rotten Tomatoes (1980s)
155 item list by Leo
5 votes 3 comments
Celebrities Who Married Their Co-Stars
93 item list by SwtChaos
14 votes 22 comments
The Ultimate Jackie Chan List
121 item list by Manling
28 votes 7 comments

View more top voted lists

People who voted for this also voted for


More lists from judmac1