Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
Avatar
Added by PvtCaboose91 on 23 Dec 2011 01:59
425 Views 1 Comments
6
vote

Biggest 3-D Blunders

Sort by: Showing 8 items
Decade: Rating: List Type:
People who added this item 1854 Average listal rating (1234 ratings) 5.6 IMDB Rating 5.8


I saw this on opening night at the theatre, before the bad buzz engulfed this massive pile of shit. Having been dazzled by Avatar, I was still a 3-D fan at this point... But oh man, the conversion was HORRIBLE. It was disjointed and rushed, and it honestly hurt my eyes. The brightness levels were also a huge problem. Even Warner Brothers know how much the 3-D sucked, because apparently they did further work on the conversion for its home video release. I haven't seen said Blu-ray 3-D, but I don't intend to. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

3-D Rating: 1/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 561 Average listal rating (369 ratings) 4.9 IMDB Rating 5.2


This movie was not filmed for viewers wearing sunglasses in dark cinemas. Many fight scenes take place in claustrophobic caves or in dusty, smoky areas. Movies originally planned for 3-D will bear the dark glasses factor in mind and light scenes accordingly, but the filmmakers here did not. But that's really the least of their problems. I have never seen such a sickening display of 3-D on my home video set-up. It did not look like genuine 3-D; it looked like a few cardboard cut-outs at different levels of depth. I couldn't bear to watch past the first couple of minutes.

3-D Rating: 3/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 3229 Average listal rating (2214 ratings) 6.7 IMDB Rating 7
Thor (2011)


I loved Thor, it was one of my favourite blockbusters of the 2011 summer season. But I saw it in 3-D, and I kept wishing I had sought out a 2-D session. The extra-dimensional effects were terrible. The depth was terrible, there were no worthwhile pop-out effects, and it mostly looked like 2-D at different levels. I refused to buy this movie on 3-D Blu-ray, even though I own a 3-D television.

3-D Rating: 3/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 2338 Average listal rating (1497 ratings) 6.4 IMDB Rating 6.9


While seeing this movie on the big screen, I consistently removed my 3-D glasses, to see if the image was blurry. It often wasn't. I often kept searching for 3-D imagery with glasses on, but it was flat and ineffective. This was filmed in 3-D, but you wouldn't know it. Even 3-D conversions look better than this. When this movie was playing, I'd cinema-check sessions, both 2-D and 3-D... I could never tell the difference.

3-D Rating: 3/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 4291 Average listal rating (2981 ratings) 6.5 IMDB Rating 7.1
I, Robot (2004)


On some television sets, you can press a 3-D conversion button, and the television will haphazardly convert anything you want into 3-D. It's not as good as the real thing, but it's a fun novelty. I, Robot in 3-D is basically that random novelty. Instead of a meticulous conversion, three or four technicians spent a few months putting the movie through an automated conversion machine. No time was spent rotoscoping, or negotiating depth... it was automatic. Bollocks.

3-D Rating: 3/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 647 Average listal rating (386 ratings) 5.6 IMDB Rating 5.8


Sometimes the film looks good in 3-D. A few shots here and there look effective. But for the most part, the 3-D here is awful. It evoked memories of Clash of the Titans. Things look flat, some shots are really badly-handled and look puzzling, and there's a bit of shaky-cam throughout, sometimes at night, making the images impossible to follow. I wish I saw this in 2-D.

3-D Rating: 4/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 1203 Average listal rating (793 ratings) 4.1 IMDB Rating 4


First of all, I have not seen the full thing in 3-D. However, I did see the trailer in 3-D a number of times, and I've read reports of people who hated the extra dimension. From what I saw in the trailer, the rotoscoping is dreadful, and the 3-D makes the special effects look even more obvious and like a video game. I hated this movie and will never watch it again, so I'll never experience the full movie in 3-D. Thank Christ.

3-D Rating: 4/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:
People who added this item 1572 Average listal rating (1056 ratings) 6.3 IMDB Rating 7
World War Z (2013)


While I have not seen the full movie in 3-D, I did watch large chunks of it while cinema-checking at work. I was not impressed. And neither were the patrons. When the film opened at work, we had one daily 2-D session and four 3-D sessions. The 2-D session kept selling out, and the 3-D sessions received dire attendance. A couple weeks later, we were showing three 2-D sessions a day, and no 3-D.
The problem with 3-D for this movie is simple: there's a lot of shaky-cam and dimly-lit scenes. At times it's impossible to follow things without getting a headache.

3-D Rating: 5/10
PvtCaboose91's rating:

There are definitely more bad 3-D presentations out there than quality ones. Here are some of the more glaringly terrible 3-D presentations I've witnessed.

Added to




Related lists

Other Favorites of 2010
10 item list by NMartucci
3 votes 1 comment
The Evolution of Donnie Yen
70 item list by jordanwiles94
3 votes
Best Games of 2007
60 item list by Derron
4 votes 1 comment
Best Handheld Games of 2005
32 item list by Derron
3 votes 2 comments
Top 10 Biggest Opening Days
10 item list by jay-jay
2 votes 1 comment
Night Visions 2011 movie list
14 item list by quisma88
18 votes 1 comment
Moviefone's 16 Sci-Fi Movie Blunders
16 item list by moviebuff
The World Is Not Enough: Alternate Casting
6 item list by ChihuahuaDaddy
4 votes 1 comment

View more top voted lists

People who voted for this also voted for


More lists from PvtCaboose91