Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Avatar
Added by A.M.A on 26 Oct 2014 08:30
304 Views 5 Comments
26
vote

10 A-List Directors And The Projects They Never Go

Add header image

Choose file... or enter url:
Sort by: Showing 10 items
Rating: List Type:


Would a Darren Aronofksy film have inspired the barrage of mature, grounded super-hero films in the same manner as Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins? I’m not so sure. Nolan’s Memento teemed with mainstream potential, while Aronofsky’s work has always been delightfully singular and impossible to either pigeonhole or imitate. That’s probably why it was good that Aronofksy eventually dropped out of his proposed fifth film in the Batman franchise: Batman: Year One. You can’t help but wonder, though, what he would have brought to the series. The Pi filmmaker worked alongside Frank Miller -- who wrote the graphic novel The Dark Knight Returns -- on the screenplay, and he even declared, "Toss out everything you can imagine about Batman! Everything! We’re starting completely anew." Warner Bros. eventually decided that Aronofsky’s R-rated Batman pitch aimed at adult fans, which included a suicidal Jim Gordon, an African-American Alfred, and a more guerrilla-style Batman, was just too risky. Aronofksy has since admitted that he’d have still cast Christian Bale, though.
A.M.A's rating:
Rate:


Back in 2003, Shawshank Redemption’s Frank Darabont was trying to get an Indy film of his own off the ground. It was entitled Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods, and apparently Steven Spielberg and Harrison Ford both absolutely adored the script. Anticipation around a new addition to the franchise gathered more and more momentum, until George Lucas intervened. The Star Wars director declared that he wasn’t interested, and it quickly fell apart. Adamant that the film would make an incredible fourth installment to the series, Darabont even told MTV that he confronted Lucas and declared, "You have a fantastic script. I think you’re insane." Unfortunately, Lucas didn’t react well to these remarks, and, as a result, the film entered movie-limbo, where it has never materialized from since.
Rate:
Average listal rating (242 ratings) 7.6 IMDB Rating 0


Outside of Steven Spielberg’s sumptuously, superb original; there isn’t much to love about the Jaws franchise. Jaws 2, 3-D and The Revenge are regarded as diabolical knock-offs of the 1975 classic. But had John Hughes’ script for the third installment to the series been greenlit, he wouldn’t have just taken it in a completely different direction by combining it with another hugely popular franchise -- The National Lampoon. According to Splitsider, Hughes was an unknown who hadn’t even written a screenplay when his boss at the National Lampoon publisher, Matty Simmons, offered him National Lampoon’s Jaws 3, People 0. Universal eventually pull the plug, though, because Steven Spielberg thought it would demean the franchise. He even threatened to leave the studio if they proceeded. On a more positive note though, this is how Hughes entered the movie industry. Jaws 3-D, meanwhile, surely did more damage than a National Lampoon version ever could.
Rate:


The most recent entry on the list, Soberbergh envisioned that his Cleopatra would be a 3-D rock musical that starred Catherine Zeta-Jones and consisted of songs from Guided By Voices’ Robert Pollard. A $30 million budget was organized, while Hugh Jackman and Ray Winstone were attached to star. But when Wolverine dropped out back in 2009, Soderbergh realized that his full slate had gone off-schedule, so the entire project deflated. There have been some discussions that it would find a new home on Broadway, but that never materialized.
A.M.A's rating:
Rate:


One of the greatest minds to ever step-foot behind a camera, Kubrick had a number of cinematic efforts that he was never able to find funding for. But there is one in particular that movie scholars and experts despair over immensely. Buoyed by the success of 2001: A Space Odyssey in 1969, Kubrick set out to make an epic biography of Napoleon Bonaparte. He conducted research, intimately reading dozens, if not hundreds of books, on the French emperor, scouted locations across Europe, and even made a deal with the Romanian army to let him use 50,000 of their troops for filming, before spiraling budget estimates and the release of the 1970 flop, Waterloo, convinced Kubrick to make Barry Lyndon instead. According to Taschen’s comprehensive book, Stanley Kubrick's Napoleon, The Greatest Movie Never Made, Kubrick even started to imitate the legendary figure's eating habits. Now that's dedication.
A.M.A's rating:
Rate:


It’s probably safe to assume that Chaplin’s depiction of Napoleon would have been slightly different to Kubrick’s. It just goes to show how delightfully askew Chaplin’s mind was, that he reportedly saw something deeply comic about Bonaparte’s eyes, and even his pose. Chaplin developed several screenplays for a project that he never filmed (and simply referred to as N, according to a visual essay by Chaplin archivist, Cecilia Cenciarelli). Chaplin also found himself receiving advice from none-other than Winston Churchill. But when he eventually became aware that his cinematic dream would never be realized, he used the material he’d collected to help him with his satire on Hitler in his seminal 1941 masterpiece, The Great Dictator.
Rate:


Alfred Hitchcock’s debut in American cinema could have been oh so different. Having wowed Hollywood from afar with his British cinematic exploits, Hitchcock decided to make the trek across the Atlantic. When he arrived, his first planned picture was supposed to be a drama about the sinking of the Titanic, which would be produced by David O. Selznick. It was even reported that the movie heavyweight planned to buy the SS Leviathan and sink it for production. Despite the fact that Selznick and Hitchcock seriously wanted to make the movie, it never really got close to production. In fact there wasn’t even a script, except for a 20-page treatment (that is difficult to dig up). Instead Hitchcock made Rebecca, which was a huge hit, and the rest, as they say, is history.
A.M.A's rating:
Rate:
Average listal rating (368 ratings) 8.7 IMDB Rating 0


Having adapted Joseph Conrad’s epic novel for radio, Welles wanted Heart Of Darkness to be his first foray onto the big screen. However, there were reported issues from the get-go. Welles’ script clocked in at a whooping 184 pages, while the amount of special effects work needed, the huge jungle set planned, and excessive use of POV, led R.K.O’s interests to cool. The final nail in this cinematic coffin came when it was predicted that the film’s budget would be more than $1 million. Welles was told to make another film. He decided on Citizen Kane, and eventually Francis Ford Coppola turned Heart Of Darkness into Apocalypse Now. It’s hard to say that things didn’t turn out for the best of both counts.
Rate:


Would the world have a better opinion of Mel Gibson if he’d made Fahrenheit 451? Probably not, but it's worth noting that Gibson was a stellar filmmaker before his private conversations doomed him in the court of public opinion. Years ago, Gibson planned to direct a remake of Francois Truffaut’s 1966 adaptation of Bradbury’s seminal novel, which is set in a future world where books are outlawed and burned. He even planned to cast Brad Pitt in the leading role. But the project ended up being delayed for a number of years as Gibson moved to other films. His private conflicts temporarily derailed his career, though Gibson has been returning to acting gigs. He may return to the director's chair some day, but nothing has been heard of this film in years.
A.M.A's rating:
Rate:
Average listal rating (198 ratings) 8.3 IMDB Rating 0


Allegedly one of the greatest scripts to never be produced, Walter Brown Newman’s period drama revolved around the black plague ripping through a 17th century English town. As you can imagine, it wasn’t full of laughs. Unfortunately it was a case of a great script landing at the wrong time. The film’s rather depressing subject matter was an obstacle. One producer told Newman, "I read it on a rainy Sunday and damn near committed suicide." The proposed film faced a nap-inducing run time, according to reports. Meanwhile, the collapse of the studio-system in the 1960s meant that there wasn’t a whole host of producers or studios lining up to bring the film to the big screen. Legendary director John Huston was the closest man who came to doing so. Despite his previous clout, though, he’d had a string of flops by the time he wanted to make Harrow Alley, and financiers wouldn’t let him near it. Maybe it just wasn’t meant to be.
A.M.A's rating:
Rate:

Added to




Related lists

You Can't Call yourself a Movie Expert if you.....
13 item list by Nattkrypet
3 votes
Versatile directors
15 item list by johanlefourbe
74 votes 56 comments
So brilliant..... yet Oscraless
24 item list by snoopy
9 votes 4 comments
Listal's 100 best Directors (The Results)
100 item list by propelas
185 votes 118 comments
Best Up and Coming Directors (2009 Edition)
50 item list by Stehako
14 votes
Top Deceased Directors
59 item list by diabolical dr voodoo
25 votes 4 comments
My top Ten Horror Directors
10 item list by Larry Talbot
3 votes
Top Living Directors
57 item list by diabolical dr voodoo
14 votes
Old Friends: Just Push Play
139 item list by Michael S
8 votes 2 comments

View more top voted lists

Comments

Posted: 2 years, 8 months ago at Oct 26 10:36
You asked for my opinion: Kubrick, Chaplin, Hitchcock, Welles: fine. But I wouldn't consider Darabont, Aranofsky, Hughes and Gibson as A List, Your favourites? O.k. Try some of the international greats: most films (and most of the best films) are not in English!
Posted: 2 years, 7 months ago at Oct 27 15:15
loved this list! These are some of the greatest directors ever.
Avatar
Posted: 2 years, 7 months ago at Oct 27 18:11
Agree with Kenji on their choices and comments. like your list and commentary nevertheless.
Posted: 2 years, 7 months ago at Nov 2 0:38
If you ask me Nolan's Gotham was still pretty gratuitously violent. All about urban vigilantism and they turned the damn bat-mobile into a tank - so what's changed? I remember the Aronofsky pitch, and to this day I still try to visualize what the "Pi" director would have done with his version? I used to see it on the IMDB and kept coming across it periodically and remember when all of a sudden Aronofsky's name wasn't on there anymore...

Yeah, I concur - "Jaws 3D" WAS the National Lampoon version. Just goes to show you what ego-maniacs and gangster businessmen Spielberg/Lucas are in 'Hollyweird', my God look at the pull they have, the studios practically revolve around the way they think, not the other way around. Poor struggling indie directors, get the sh** end of the stick.

I already knew that about Orson Welles and Stanley Kubrick but the others completely shock me. Darabont's title sounds really intriguing. Having read Graham Hancock's "Fingerprints of the Gods" I can only surmise what it might have been about?...
Posted: 2 years ago at Jun 22 12:21
This is good idea, but there are missing some really awesome uncompleted movies like Alejandro Jodorowsky´s Dune.
Edit: 2 years ago

Post comment


Insert image

drop image here
(or click)
or enter URL:
 link image?  square?

Insert video

Format block