Son of Dracula (1943)
Lists
list by diabolical dr voodoo
list by diabolical dr voodoo
list by Ruisperkele
list by the giraffe
Cover art, photos and screenshots
Reviews
Unfairly neglected
Update feed
“True, Son of Dracula is not as good as the 1931 Bela Lugosi film, which is one of the best film versions and has one of the best and most iconic Draculas in Lugosi. But it is(in my opinion) much better than its reputation, and leagues ahead of House of Dracula, it's better made, more atmospherically involving, better acted generally, has a much stronger ending and actually knew what to do with the characters.Son of Dracula does have its flaws. Some of the story does get a bit draggy and confused, Dracula/Alucard's origins could have been better explored. Am also mixed on Lon Chaney Jnr's title role performance, I did appreciate the idea to show Dracula having an inner turmoil(different, as the character is more associated as evil-incarnate, but interesting) and Chaney does portray that sub” read more
"When Katherine, a beautiful Southern girl obsessed with thoughts of eternal life, invites Count Alucard to come to her mansion in the U.S., she unleashes a Pandora's box of horror on unsuspecting relatives and neighbors."