Login
Most Unnecessary Sequels
5942
6.9
7.1
Fuck it, can we just agree that all the Pirates sequels were unnecessary?
876
5.4
5.5
The first film in itself was unnecessary, so, um, yeah... Go figure.
17
5.3
3.9
Straight-to-DVD and none of the original cast. Since when was that a good idea?
580
3.6
2.9
A shark on a rampage for revenge... Lol.
242
4.5
3.6
Who was asking for a sequel to Donnie Darko without Donnie? About his sister instead? Oh yeah... Nobody.
151
4.4
3.8
How do you top the awfulness of a terrible PG-13 period piece? You take the budget down to zero and retain none of the original cast, that's how!
151
3.4
2.6
Uwe Boll couldn't even get Kristanna Loken back for this one. And what's she doing these days?
34
3.3
3.1
All Uwe Boll sequels are unnecessary, because all Uwe Boll films are unnecessary. Poor Dolph.
490
3.5
3.4
Because apparently everyone wanted a prequel without Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels.
1749
5
5.4
So now we're doing spinoffs of characters who weren't even likeable in the original movie?
2
1
2.1
A fat kid doing an impression of Jim Carrey? Who funded this?
355
5.7
5.7
Ah, horror sequels... They really don't work much, do they?
256
4.5
4.1
Great, another straight-to-video effort with none of the original cast. Sounds like a party.
6248
6.5
7.2
The Wachowskis really are one-hit wonders.
507
3.8
3.9
Did anyone like this? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
