Wings update feed
" Notes: To be honest, it turned out to be better than I expected. Sure, it was probably not one of the best movies I saw from the 20's but I'm not surprised that it was a big success when it was released and there is no doubt that the damned thing was really spectacular. Indeed, before it started, I was wondering how they would manage to shoot these dogfights and I never expected that these scenes would be so well done and so convincing. I mean, you have to keep in mind that the movie was made "
" Notes: To be honest, it turned out to be better than I expected. Sure, it was probably not one of the best movies I saw from the 20's but I'm not surprised that it was a big success when it was released and there is no doubt that the damned thing was really spectacular. Indeed, before it started, I was wondering how they would manage to shoot these dogfights and I never expected that these scenes would be so well done and so convincing. I mean, you have to keep in mind that the movie was made "
“I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was the first winner of the Best Picture Academy Award, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, it turned out to be better than I expected. Sure, it was probably not one of the best movies I saw from the 20's but I'm not surprised that it was a big success when it was released. Basically, back then, they apparently didn't mind giving such a prize to a blockbuster movie with not much depth and I was thinking that it would be like awarding this prize to 'Top Gun: Maverick' almost 100 years later which would obviously never happen. Anyway, there is no doubt that the damned thing was really spectacular. Indeed, before it started, I was wondering how they would manage to shoot these dogfights and I never exp” read more
" 2020: 467 2019: 464 2018: 472 2017: 471 2016: 470 2015: 463 2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
" 2019: 464 2018: 472 2017: 471 2016: 470 2015: 463 2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
" 2018: 472 2017: 471 2016: 470 2015: 463 2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
" 2017: 471 2016: 470 2015: 463 2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
" 2016: 470 2015: 463 2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
"2015: 463 2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
"2014: 462 2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
"2013: 469 2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "
"2012: 465 2011: 464 2010: 459 2009: 455 "