Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

"GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra" (2009)

Posted : 10 years, 10 months ago on 24 June 2013 08:38

FIRST IMPRESSIONS

GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra
 is one of the worst action movies I've ever seen in my life! Yes, this was one of the most miserable two hours I've ever had! It's almost as bad as Transformers 2 – and believe me, coming from me, that is very, very bad indeed!
I should clarify first that I never watched the 80s GI Joe show, and I don't know how well this movie represents the characters from the toy line-up.
I can say, though, that the performances are all dull and uninspired, and the CGI is awful – some of the worst I've ever seen!
But I think the biggest problem is that the pacing is too fucking fast! The whole narrative rushes along far too quickly to allow you to take anything in. Even by about the five-minute mark, I was going, "Slow the fuck down!" Every scene feels like the movie's in a hurry to just get it over with.
The fact that the action scenes are so frequent, and so terribly shot and edited, makes things even more insufferable. Again, it's all cut far too quickly, and the pacing doesn't let anything set itself up properly, so no moment is given the chance to be exciting.
And the last act is a symphony of woefully predictable clichés.
In a nutshell, this movie is way too fast-paced for its own good. The inconsiderate pace and absolutely abysmal effects make it a raw showcase of pure frustration.

My rating: turkey


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 31 May 2011 09:13

Honestly, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but Nick, my step-son, really wanted to watch it so we ended up watching it in the movie theater. Well, it was definitely not really good, I’m afraid. The point is that I did watch the cartoon as a kid back then, and of course, the whole thing was terribly cheesy but it could have worked but the makers seriously messed up the whole thing. Indeed, there were some rather spectacular action scenes, I’ll give you that but they all really look fake. Of course, the story is never really important with this kind of flicks but, come on, they could have done much better than this. Eventually, the best surprise was Sienna Miller who really looked awesome as the Baroness but that’s seriously the only thing that more or less impressed me. Somehow, they thought they could salvage this failure and they released a sequel and even though they did include Bruce Willis, one of the biggest action stars that ever lived and Dwayne Johnson who has pretty much become the franchise savior (see also ‘Fast Five’ and ‘Journey 2: The Mysterious Island’), this second installment was pretty much as much underwhelming as this one. To conclude, it was a rather disappointing feature and I don’t think it is really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

G.I. Joe does not exist...If only.

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 20 June 2010 02:59

''Technically, G.I. Joe does not exist, but if it did, it'd be comprised of the top men and women from the top military units in the world, the alpha dog's. When all else fails, we don't.''

An elite military unit comprised of special operatives known as G.I. Joe, operating out of The Pit, takes on an evil organization led by a notorious arms dealer.

Dennis Quaid: General Abernathy / Hawk

The man behind The Mummy series and Van Helsing explodes his latest project G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra upon audiences.
Although knowing Director Stephen Sommers you instantly assume CGI, effects and colourful meanderings will take precedence over any substantial material or dialogue. So what is the result? Well, it is an overblown fest of nonsense with no defining plot.



Sommers never truly develops his characters thus we can never relate to them. By all means you could argue he tries, by using flashbacks, used at the strangest possible interludes. The acting doesn't help matters either because performances range from dastardly villainy to macho good guys cracking lame jokes.
Going back to the flashbacks, which merely include a few of the main members of G.I. Joe and Cobra, the rest of the cast, which is many do not have the necessary fleshing out to define them.
Needless to say, Joseph Gordon-Levitt impressed me the most, if I had to choose a defining, stand out actor. He plays the nefarious evil Doctor whom is also the brother to Sienna Miller's Baroness, although supposedly recognizable to the untrained eye he instantly was spotted by me. He gives a chilling, over the top, twisted definition to bring to life his character. What else? He's clearly having fun and I guiltily admit watching him.
The rest of the cast range from the eye candy females there to drawn in the mindless male audiences whom don't know any better, and the strong, buff men used to draw the females. Yet, this is a very boyish film much like the Hasbro toys the film is based upon.

''They feel no fear. Cortical nerve clusters showed complete inactivity. They feel no pain. Concepts of morality are disengaged. They feel no regrets. No remorse.''

Sienna Miller utilizes the advantages of the push up bra and a sexy exotic black costume while red headed Rachel Nichols does exactly the same thing with her shaped body suit. G.I. Joe clearly is style over substance in a dizzying array of CGI mayhem.
Villain arms dealer Christopher Eccleston has a Scottish accent that quite honestly makes milk curdle with it's comical tones of stereotypicalist provocation. Whereas Dennis Quaid's Hawk expects us to believe he's an American General leading an Elite Unit of technologically blessed block heads.
Ray Park reprises a silent role from his days of The Phantom Menace, Marlon Wayans is the black guy cracking jokes, and Arnold Voosloo pops into this Sommers outing to whistle. Speaking of Voosloo, G.I Joe is littered with The Mummy old cast churning out odd cameos which essentially back fire because the film becomes a ''Spot The Mummy cast member!'' outing instead of just a contorted mess. I'm actually puzzled as to whether Brendan Fraser and Kevin J. O'Connor appearing randomly in scenes is good or bad.
As for Jonathan Pryce being cast as the US president someone is clearly having a lovely laugh at our expense.
Channing Tatum as duke, the so called lead man, shows not everyone in this World has the ability to act or say lines correctly. He's essentally a walking, talking bloke whom just found his way out of the gym.
He does succeed in being more wooden than a cemented lama which one night became fossilized by non-movement.

What's funny is that little kids, young teenagers and handfuls of geeks or fans of the toys will love this chaotic, colourful rainbow of action and CGI.
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra for me, was at times fun yet mostly a confusing experience. I mean, they actually fooled me into for a moment indulging a thought that the film may have a story to back itself up. The beginning has a period flashback in Scotland reminiscent of The Man In the Iron Mask yet the illusion is dispelled with the jump back to modern reality and G.I. Joe prominently shows it's true colours. A hyper actioned affair with no defining plot. Gigantic set pieces and CGI over-kill may impress the simple minded film junkies who need a quick fix but alas for those more intelligent viewers, like I, I can boldly say we're not fooled. Try again Sommers. Reading books might help Stephen discover what substance and story means.

''The time has come for the cobra to rise up and reveal himself. You will call me Commander.''


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Enjoyable film with great effects & a fun story...

Posted : 14 years, 5 months ago on 9 December 2009 02:39

I had zero interest in watching this at all because it looked an absolutely shit film but when I saw it at the cinema, it wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. It still wasn't a very good film but I was quite surprised that it wasn't awful which is what I was expecting, really. One thing that this film does have that pretty much all fantasy and science fiction films have are breathtaking visual and sound effects. The effects in the action were good but it sort of looks like something that Michael Bay would do because there were loads of mindless explosions. I think that the only Oscar that it could be on the list to be nominated for would be for Best Visual Effects.


Channing Tatum's performance wasn't good because I don't think he made very much effort to get into the character. To me, Channing is like another Zac Efron. Yes, Channing is a charming actor to play a character like Duke but I think he could have made a better effort. Marlon Wayans was actually quite humourous in this one. No, he wasn't hilarious but I did have little chuckles under my breath a few times. Rachel Nichols and Sienna Miller weren't bad as their characters. I was blown away and taken completely by their looks.


Stephen Sommers isn't a very good director at all, really especially with The Mummy, The Mummy Returns and Van Helsing. However, his work on G.I. Joe wasn't that bad. It was just for entertainment but I am ever so glad that Sommers didn't direct this film like Michael Bay has done in the past in his action films. Sommers didn't have that much overloaded and mindless explosions like Michael Bay usually have in his films. It wasn't top-notch filmmaking but it was decent enough for entertainment which I accepted.


Overall, G.I. Joe: The Rise Of Cobra is a neither bad nor good film adaptation of the famous toys that is just a piece of entertainment. I find it a typical action film that has breathtaking technical effects but not that decent acting and directing.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Good Movie Fun

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 5 November 2009 04:08

Not bad for what it is. Not as campy as lets say Speed Racer. But pretty good, great CGI & special effects. Storyline pretty good. Down falls to the movie Dennis Quaid as General Hawk, and the kid from 3rd Rock from the sun as Cobra Commander. Costumes where great except for giving Snake Eyes lips. What the hell that all about? First Optimus Prime and now Snake Eyes. For good old fashion fun when watching a movie definately one to check out


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Pure Junk Food

Posted : 14 years, 7 months ago on 7 October 2009 01:44

"Technically, GI Joe does not exist. But if it did, it would be comprised of the best men and women from the top military units in the world, the alpha dog's. When all else fails we don't."


Built on the philosophy that any line of Hasbro action figures will translate to the big screen with lucrative results (Ă  la Michael Bay's Transformers), G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra is exactly the type of overblown, loud, mindless summer blockbuster it clearly aspired to be - a cartoonish actioner of ornately costumed good vs. evil with large explosions, plenty of CGI, very few nuances and some woeful acting. The filmmakers behind G.I. Joe visibly intended to replicate what a 10-year-old boy's imagination might conjure up while playing with his action figures, and the result is an action film highlight reel that's pleasing to the eye but not to any other organ. On this note it's an awful movie by any standard, but it's also a great deal of fun.


For those unaware, G.I. Joe is not a person - it's an organisation (a bit like the X-Men, except the G.I. Joes gain superpowers through technology and training rather than innate ability). General Hawk (Quaid) is the one who presides over this elite unit of warriors. The plot, so to speak, concerns the Joes whose mission is to defend a bunch of cutting edge NATO weapons from an evil organisation. The bad guys plan to steal these weapons and use them to destroy strategic global targets in an effort to (what else?)...take over the world! Of course, none of this detail matters because the whole storyline is an excuse to showcase action sequences that'll just be interrupted by a poorly-placed flashback or a silly joke.


G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra is virtually wall-to-wall action, delivered at such a brisk pace that the lull is very noticeable during brief breaks for exposition. The dialogue is expectedly risible, while the story is at once elemental and incomprehensible; jumping from 1640s France to the near future before zipping to Tokyo 20 years earlier, and so on. The screenplay (credited to five writers) is a clichéd mess of fanboy pandering (the famous "knowing is half the battle" line is of course spoken) which struggles to introduce a cumbersome roster of one-note characters while a world domination scheme unfolds that wouldn't pass muster in the most self-indulgent efforts of the James Bond franchise. The script also spends an absurd amount of time on flashbacks that help establish all the characters in the Joe universe. Half the bad guys were originally good guys, the Cobra back-story is turned into a chintzy soap opera, and the origins tale of Snake Eyes is compressed into a few short flashbacks (usually concerning fights between two kids). Even despite the attempts to offer an origins tale for most of the protagonists, they remain as plastic as the toys that inspired them. Sure, expecting character development in a G.I. Joe motion picture is foolhardy, but tension and excitement in action movies are tied to the viewer's ability to root for the protagonists - and it's hard to root for underdeveloped characters.


On the other hand, G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra is a devilishly fun and entertaining guilty pleasure. Why? Because it gets it - it knows the pedigree it wants to be, and it pursues it. All that's missing from this film is the hands of an 8-year-old on the screen making the characters move. Director Stephen Sommers only operates in one gear; infusing G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra with a blistering pace that makes it somewhat easier to overlook the film's numerous shortcomings. The atmosphere of unapologetic cartoonishness is exacerbated by the eye-rolling overuse of computer-generated special effects, with the pervasive lack of reality reinforcing the film's proud status as a big-budget summer blockbuster.


In any case, this film is far better than Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - not because it's more creative or thoughtful (it isn't) but because Sommers is a more sure-handed director than Michael Bay. An audience may not have a great deal of emotional investment in the action, but at least it's comprehensible (the camera never experiences a sudden seizure). Admittedly, too, the action sequences are frequently exhilarating, and the inclusion of several better-than-expected set-pieces (like a breathless chase through the streets of Paris) allow the film to be far more fun than it should be. Yet the quality of the CGI is inconsistent (at times bordering on photorealism, at other times embarrassingly phoney), and the climax erodes interest by splicing together a few hundred concurrent battles instead of just one conflict. While far too long at almost two hours, G.I. Joe is at least not as excruciating or unending as Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.


The only aspect of G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra which does resemble Transformers is the attempt on the part of the filmmakers to have it both ways - to make it as childish and blood-free as possible to draw in kids and obtain a PG-13 rating for maximum profits (though it still underperformed at the box office), while also including enough shooting and violence to keep the older demographic entertained. Like most of Sommers' other work, it's impossible to take the deeply stupid material seriously, and it's therefore jarring that there's a semi-serious tone to everything. It's like Team America minus the winks and overt humour.


Unsurprisingly, G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra features atrocious acting. Channing Tatum is the most glaring offender in the bad-acting department, with a performance that's beyond unconvincingly wooden. Sienna Miller is equally dreadful. An audience should become invested in the relationship between Tatum's Duke and Miller's Ana, but poor writing and lack of chemistry between the leads fails to sell the romance as anything more than a feeble plot element. Christopher Eccleston and Joseph Gordon-Levitt provide a few giggles; they understand they're playing cartoons, and have suitably hammed it up. Marlon Wayans is the film's comic relief, but he's only slightly amusing. Also in the cast is a stale Dennis Quaid, and a few actors from Sommers' The Mummy who are given small roles (Brendan Fraser, Arnold Vosloo and Kevin J. O'Connor).


The subtitle The Rise of Cobra is actually misleading - the Cobra doesn't bother to rise until the last few minutes. There are also loose ends dangling everywhere, which suggest the filmmakers were thinking of a sequel before producing this chapter. The film is therefore not a standalone entity but a tease for future instalments, which makes it an unsatisfying standalone experience before those sequels have been made.


If any film of 2009 has suffered bad buzz and worse marketing, it's G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. The result is nothing excruciating, but at its best moments it's still entirely forgettable. Then again, the 10-year-old boys for whom the movie is tailor-made aren't seeking Oscar-calibre performances or anything thought-provoking. They want eye-candy and no-holds-barred action, which G.I. Joe delivers at mind-numbing pace. Is it perfect? Fuck no. It's rubbish. But it's still fun.

5.3/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

G.I. (Gastei o Ingresso) JOE

Posted : 14 years, 9 months ago on 10 August 2009 03:37

O que vocĂȘ costuma procurar num filme? E o que faz com que vocĂȘ goste dele? Normalmente a resposta depende de com que tipo de filme estamos lidando, e do nosso humor na hora em que nos sentamos diante da telona ou da TV de casa e apertamos play. Mas Ă© basicamente a idĂ©ia de “ser convencido” e “ser envolvido com a histĂłria” que procuramos e que nos faz sorrir de satisfação quando as luzes do cinema se acendem apĂłs uma boa sessĂŁo.
Em G.I. JOE, se vocĂȘ espera ver cenas de ação eletrizantes, lutas que grudem vocĂȘ na poltrona e movimentos acrobĂĄticos ultra bem filmados, sinto muito, vocĂȘ vai esperar sentado atĂ© as luzes acenderem. Tudo bem, talvez eu Ă© que nĂŁo seja tĂŁo impressionĂĄvel, mas as cenas de luta sĂŁo tĂŁo mal exploradas que dĂĄ sono. Cansa de ver.

Se vocĂȘ entĂŁo tem esperança em ver efeitos visuais incrĂ­veis, CGI altamente realistas e design de produção convincentes, vocĂȘ tambĂ©m se decepcionarĂĄ amargamente. Passaram longe da tecnologia e qualidade de Transformers. Aeronaves que parecem ter esquecido de finalizar o rendering, Chroma key evidente em cenas bestas. Virou moda explicar tudo com nanotecnologia no cinema ultimamente, atĂ© controlar humanos para que obedeçam a controles remotos com tela touch-screen e sejam imunes a veneno de cobra o que atĂ© o fim do filme isso nĂŁo revela nenhuma justificativa, mas merece animação didĂĄtica Ă  la "Dr. House" e tudo. Foi demais pra minha cabeça...

Pessoas em CGI dando saltos absurdos com movimentos tĂŁo mal modelados que vocĂȘ ri e faz de conta que nĂŁo viu o que viu. No fim todo mundo nota. Nessa hora Ă© comum ouvir gargalhadas no cinema. Lembra que vocĂȘ percebeu que Neo parecia um bonequinho de borracha em Matrix 2? Pois Ă©...
Se vocĂȘ entĂŁo deposita suas fichas em pelo menos algum humor, um pouco de comĂ©dia , algum alĂ­vio cĂŽmico e atuaçÔes convincentes que paguem o ingresso, vocĂȘ se frustra novamente. A menos que vocĂȘ tenha se divertido com o Marlon Wayans de “Todo Mundo em PĂąnico” e “As Branquelas”. Ele sĂł arranca risos de vergonha alheia mesmo porque sua tentativa de convencer no papel de um soldado de elite Ă© completamente falha. Channing Tatum Ă© bem mais tĂ©cnico e sua cara-de-mau atĂ© convence nesse aspecto, mas sua atuação tambĂ©m nĂŁo vai mais longe que isso. Sienna Miller faz o papel da mulher vilĂŁ gostosona de decote que luta corpo a corpo contra a mulher do bem quando todo mundo luta contra todo mundo no alto do filme.
Byung-hun Lee no papel de Storm Shadow (Ninja Branco) talvez seja o cara que faria vocĂȘ sentir algum alĂ­vio quando entra em cena. ExpressĂ”es convincentes e postura de um verdadeiro vilĂŁo implacĂĄvel. Mas a alegria acaba quando começam a contar a histĂłria que remonta Ă  infĂąncia dele e do Snake Eyes. NĂŁo dava para ser mais clichĂȘ. Simplesmente jogaram uma motivação infantil besta no vilĂŁo e deixaram assim mesmo.

O filme fica sendo constantemente atrapalhado por atuaçÔes e detalhes irritantes, como o bigodinho e franja de SaĂŻd Taghmaoui e seu jeitinho estranho... A boca torcida e o cenho franzido do Dennis Quaid pra nos convencer que ele Ă© o militar valentĂŁo e sĂ©rio, a burrice dos “herĂłis” diante do Ăłbvio plano dos vilĂ”es e aquela historinha padronizada de “Sequestrem o herĂłi! Quero-o vivo! Contarei a ele todo o meu plano maligno antes que ele me mate de uma maneira altamente irĂŽnica.”

O filme exagera na tecnologia militar e mostra pessoas dirigindo carros e motos perfeitamente comuns em Paris, enquanto aeronaves movidas a propulsĂŁo elĂ©trica de todos os tamanhos com piloto automĂĄtico e comando por voz circulam por todos os lados. Complexos militares gigantescos de fora e aparentemente minĂșsculos por dentro construĂ­dos sob o gelo do pĂłlo norte sĂŁo coisas tĂ­picas dos vilĂ”es mais batidos e psicodĂ©licos de um filme de James Bond.
Stephen Sommers (O EscorpiĂŁo Rei, A MĂșmia, Van Helsing, Deep Rising) decidiu nĂŁo se furtar do exagero possĂ­vel de ser compreendido em algum filme de “Star Wars” mas completamente descabido em qualquer “futuro-nĂŁo-muito-distante” que se possa meramente imaginar. Exagero em dimensĂ”es, exagero de tecnologia, exagero de clichĂȘs, exagero de atores ruins, exagero de atores melhores fazendo pontinhas...

Do meu ponto de vista, fico martelando na minha consciĂȘncia o desperdĂ­cio de dinheiro que foi aquele ingresso. Se fosse pra ver o que vi, ficaria contente em reassistir “Doom: A porta do Inferno” e “007: Um Novo Dia Para Morrer”. E quando “Boom-Boom-Pow” (mĂșsica do Will.i.am) tocou nos crĂ©ditos eu fiquei imaginando uma forma de reaver meu dinheiro e tempo gastos... Mas daĂ­ eu me dei conta: Eu gostava disso quando era criança, e gostaria se fosse criança hoje. Naqueles tempos quando eu nem sabia o que era clichĂȘ, e quando qualquer caixa de papelĂŁo convencia minha imaginação fĂ©rtil transformando-se em uma aeronave de altĂ­ssima tecnologia... Preferia ter visto esse filme antes dos 10 anos, e nunca mais. Hoje, quase 20 anos depois, talvez eu me lembrasse dele com a fantasia de que teria sido um bom filme.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Call Me... Commander!!

Posted : 14 years, 9 months ago on 8 August 2009 03:25

Seeing the trailer for this made me nervous, you know; another awesome idea for an adaptation put into the wrong hands and flunking. Wrong. This is one that stuck with me.. for the better. To create an entire movie as dedication to one of the best action figure lines imaginable is awesome, and the film actually brought me back to my childhood days. For example, they follow the snow outfits to a T and the personal hellecopters make their way onto the screen as well. Each side, both the Joe's and their enemy had futuristic weapons that weren't too over the top or unbelieveable. The nano technology actually gave me goosebumps, hopefully that can't be achieved by humans anytime soon (if it isn't already out being tested) The overall story wasn't bad at all, not too lovey and/or boring, and even though the flashbacks had no real creative way to show back stories of each character, they still worked and didn't become a flaw throughout the plot. Fully trained soilder Duke is hired for the safe military trasnport of newly made nanomite atomic bombs; capable of infitate destruction unless a killswitch is thrown, eating away at anything they touch until terminated. When the convoy is destroyed by others in an attempt to steal the 4 deadly bombs, the two survivors (Duke and Rip Chord) join the Joes in helping defend the weapons. The ending wasn't too confusing either, had it's twist but didn't leave too many people wondering what happened. Experimentation and genetic mutations always have a special spot in my heart and this movie possesses characters full of scars and facial defects all with their own traits and characteristics. One of the only flaws I thought was how each of the soilders under the command of McCullen looked like his descendant (and soon enough his new self Destro), but either way, this film did it for me, can't wait for a new one.. if anything came up after the credits let me know, I didn't stay for them all.

Duke: Ok, that was crazy... What happened to you?
Ripcord: I went through the train. What happened to you?
Duke: I jumped over it.
Ripcord: [pause] You can do that?


0 comments, Reply to this entry