Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

The Child in the Garden

Posted : 6 months, 2 weeks ago on 22 October 2023 08:58

It’s certainly a product of the Forties, although in some ways America hasn’t changed that much. It’s one window on life. There’s of course a bandwagon to slap the Classics on the back, but it is more earnest and elegant than the 49th percentile movie of today, and there is something to be said for that…. 


It’s very grown-up yet very cute, of course. Of course, it’s centered around the familiar: the familiar race & gender, the middle-class-yet-not-rich, the familiar aches and pains about the wealthy, the servant, the familiar sort of hero personality where you endanger yourself through service and lack of self-worth. Of course, it’s also a decent window on some of the ugliness of early 20th-century America—the beatings and the crudeness, for example, even though as the hero you’re supposed to give of yourself and sigh, right. 


I know that must sound very cynical; I suppose that the culturally appropriate thing to do would be to give of myself/silence myself, and write an ad to something-other-than-money, you know. But I don’t see it as a bad movie, you know. I like Greta Gerwig, but I thought this was better than “Barbie”, for example. As a metaphor or something, it had a lot of promise, but it was no metaphor; she was literally a doll; she was a literal doll…. Anyway, Frank Capra ‘47 is good: very grown-up yet very cute…. Don’t knock yourself out, but it’s a very decent movie. 


…. It’s probably one of the better movies of the 1940s, or Old Hollywood comedy-drama/observational comedy movies. Beyond that, it doesn’t make much sense comparing things that aren’t alike, you know. ~Was it better than the Harry Styles Dunkirk movie? Why, funny you should ask. My father died before that movie came out, but he saw it recently as a spectral DVD, and he reported to me in a seance that it left him feeling cold…. 


…. It’s very classical: the shadow is always another person, never ~George Bailey, you know. But it’s a cute old movie. 


…. It almost makes me nostalgic for a world that I’ve never seen or lived in, and never would want to see or live in, you know. 


…. The climax isn’t very naturalistic or satisfying. I don’t mean that there can’t be angels, but it’s very: la la la, life is wonderful, life is won—(looks at watch)—ap, movie’s almost over, (cranks crank and George Bailey’s life improbably falls apart overnight). I mean, he certainly did have scorn for money, and that can wreck your life. No single action that takes place is impossible, but the feel of it is all off. For you to trust your idiot friend to take tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars (8K 1947 money) to the bank and he just loses the whole kitten caboodle—a lot would have to lead up to that, some kind of simmering insanity, you know. It doesn’t just fall out of a clear blue sky. Frank Capra is funny to watch, but if that was his notion of trouble, he must not have had a very firm grip on things. Very black or white. Dickens or jail, basically. Very strange…. 


It basically just seems to me, very materialistic, in a subtle way—albeit with a few angels thrown in as an afterthought. Certainly religion is a strange thing, and without it Frank is quite cute—but he just seems like a child, knowing very little of the powers of life and death that are out there. 


…. It kind of reminds me of Mr Collins from P&P: I’m an inconsequential nobody, but I’m also the reason why the Jazz Age never happened and everything’s good, you know. (Karen the Psychoanalyst wrote about that kind of person.) 


It’s sort of cute, though. It shows that a culture that has a lot of unresolved issues can be very innocent, in a certain sense of the word…. 


Quite grandiose, though, at the end. “I did a favor for Frank Capra. He was going downhill, but I saved him by loaning him a dime and he never made another mistake after that, and that’s the reason why nobody watches Shadow Knight’s movies and improbable nonsense never happened and it’s all because of me! It’s all because of me! I thought I was just an ordinary slightly-rich-but-not-too-rich white man: it turns out I’m God’s deputy! Hahahaha….” 


Slightly cracked, but cute…. 


Terrible transitions, though; it’s like he didn’t know what they were. He just flipped a switch, you know…. 


(Clarence in heaven eating a cupcake) Ah, that’s perfect: it’s just slightly rich—but not TOO rich…. (leaves the server a nice tip, and smiles as he leaves) 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 2 years, 2 months ago on 2 March 2022 04:20

It's a Wonderful Life is something truly special, and along with Scrooge, the original Miracle on 34th Street and Home Alones 1 and 2, it is something I watch every Christmas. Why? Because I love this movie, seriously I do. Looking through my 1000 or so reviews here, I couldn't believe I hadn't reviewed this movie; I have seen movies that I have loved and cherished since childhood and I have seen movies that belong at the bottom of the garbage. It's a Wonderful Life belongs to the former, although I am 17, I appreciate a good movie when I see one. This is more than a good movie, it's a timeless masterpiece, that holds up on repeated viewings and never loses its magic.

It's a Wonderful Life could have easily been overly-sentimental and clichéd, but the quality of the direction and the screenplay that others have summed up perfectly assured it was a beautiful, heart-warming and somewhat poignant film. While there are some funny parts, not bursting-your-gut funny but funny in a subtle sort of way, other parts are close to heart-rending. The direction from Frank Capra is excellent, sensitive and nuanced, and Capra shows even more talent as a screenwriter having penned one of the most honest and touching scripts ever in a film. Casablanca, All About Eve and The Shawshank Redemption all had wonderful scripts, but the script here has a lot to say about community spirit and shows that this film is much more than feel-good sentimentality. There is the element of feel good here, no doubt about it, but it doesn't overpower what the film intends.

Visually, It's a Wonderful Life is a wonder. I don't think it is dated at all, the cinematography is crisp, the black and white looks beautiful and the pristine Christmas scenery really does take me back. Some of my favourite ever memories was of Christmas, whether it was watching nostalgic Christmas videos, eating Christmas dinner or singing carols under the Christmas tree. Another thing I have to mention is that the movie is richly and beautifully scored, Dmitri Tiomkin's music here is absolutely gorgeous, lyrical, whimsical, nostalgic and most importantly it never felt intrusive in the more integral parts of the film. And I have to mention the story, never in my life(and I genuinely mean this) have I seen a movie where it communicates such a strong message and so well too. The story of a suicidal man who is shown the value of his life by his guardian angel is an effective, timeless one, imitated perhaps but never equalled.

Finally the acting is wonderful. James Stewart, and I seriously don't give a damn whether he was a racist or not and neither should you, is absolutely superb as George Bailey, a truly complex character who goes through such a lot to get to where he is at the end of the movie. George Bailey is like Mr Deeds, John Doe and Mr Smith rolled into one, and in my opinion only James Stewart could have given justice to a character that has self-doubt gnawed at his essential decency. Also the character change, like that of Alistair Sim's Scrooge at the end of Scrooge, was heart-breakingly believable. Donna Reed is radiant and charming as his wife, who is like a caring lover, devoted wife and dedicated mother, while Thomas Mitchell gives one of his more memorable performances as Uncle Billy. Henry Travers is a revelation as Clarence the guardian angel, but there is another performance I think is worth of mention. For a good morality tale, you need a good villain. Well in the name of Potter, you have one. Who better to portray him than the great Lionel Barrymore acting at the peak of his powers?

Overall, a timeless classic with a true and heart-rendingly poignant ending. 10/10, one of the easiest perfect scores I have made recently. Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 2 years, 4 months ago on 20 December 2021 11:57

Me ha sorprendido mucho esta película. No esperaba que me fuese a gustar tanto.

Si bien toda la fantasía del ángel es muy apropiada para el tono navideño no deja de ser una manera inverosimil para salvar al protagonista.
El final de la primera hora y inicio de la segunda se puede llegar a hacer largo y sin duda yo hubiera acortado esto pasando directamente a lo del ángel . También habría omitido el inicio con el ángel como estrella hablando con Dios en forma de galaxias o lo que sea. Saca mucho de onda aún siendo fantástico todo el proceso para que George no se mate.

Incluso alguien podría decir que el final es muy complaciente y poco realista. Pero fuck it.
El punto quedó claro: si te comportas bien con la gente la gente te lo compensará en algún momento en el que lo necesites. Para mí es verosímil teniendo como respaldo la persona que fue George Bailey y que vivía en una ciudad pequeña. Y por su trabajo tenía trato con todo el mundo y había ayudado a la mayoría de gente a sacar adelante sus vidas.

Por lo que me parece un buen final. Y el mensaje general de la película se comprende. La forma en la que se le hace ver que quitarse la vida no es la solución si bien no es mi favorita creo que podría haber sido mucho peor . Y, por decimocuarta vez, refuerza el mensaje.
Sé que incido mucho en esto. Pero el mensaje es la clave aquí.


Añadiré que James Stewart hace una actuación estelar. Si bien en algunas de Hitchcok se desmarca bastante , aquí las supera.
El cast en general actúa bien.

Conclusión: It´s a Wonderful Life se merece el respeto que se le tiene y es LA PELÍCULA navideña por excelencia.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 2 years, 6 months ago on 1 November 2021 11:13

This is a very good movie. Period. A "classic", I don't think so. This is a movie whose actual quality has been exceeded by its hype--though NOT because the producers or actors hyped it (like the typical overblown and over-hyped Hollywood film). In fact, when it was released it was not particularly successful (especially compared to other Frank Capra flicks).

No, instead it reached legendary status for TWO reasons alone. It was a public domain video (hence NO ROYALTIES REQUIRED FOR SHOWING IT) AND its setting for the movie's conclusion was the holiday season. These two factors worked together to BLITZ the American public from the 1980s to the late 90s (until its copyright status was restored). I remember these dark days, when It's A Wonderful Life was literally shown on half a dozen channels at the same time!! Not even GREAT movies should be shown that much! As a result, many began proclaiming it a classic while some others got awfully tired of seeing it--which is a shame because it's a very good film.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 2 January 2016 03:49

What a beautiful Christmas film! I cannot believe that it took me this long to see this one, but I am familiar with some of the scenes. I got to see this in 35mm. What an experience!


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Beautiful

Posted : 9 years, 10 months ago on 18 June 2014 07:53

The thing people nowadays don't get about Classics like this one is the fact that they last forever.
If you are used to watch movies from the 20th century (in general) they are flat and have no depth, there is no doubt that you'll enjoy them but that's that, you will forget them the minutes they're over.

And that's what makes this movie beautiful, aside from the beautiful performances and beautiful story, there's a great moral behind it, it gives you new meanings every time you think about it.

James Stewart is an awesome actor, the fact that he played a character that was supposed to be 27 years old while he was actually 10 years older really shows his performance.

And there isn't much to say about this movie other than the fact that it was beautiful and had a great moral behind it, That your life matters even if you don't feel that way, but you are connected to so many people and have so much influence on the environment around you that people around you won't be the same if you weren't there.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 10 years, 9 months ago on 17 July 2013 05:04

Capra's Dickensian masterpiece... James Stewart is a vision of decency as the selfless guy George Bailey who finds himself deeply loved in the smalltown community he'd once dreamed of leaving: a redemptive discovery that follows his suicidal despair one snowy Christmas night. Every time I watch it, I am surprised afresh by how late in the story Clarence the angel appears, on his mission to show George how bad the world would have looked without him. The film is gripping enough simply with the telling of George's lifestory. A genuine American classic.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Overrated, but nice

Posted : 11 years, 4 months ago on 30 December 2012 02:14

Well as the title says, it's overrated but it's still a nice family film to watch around the christmas time I guess.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 11 years, 4 months ago on 29 December 2012 07:26

Superb movie of 1946, I watched the original version of the movie in black & white. A movie with a touching story of person named George Bailey, who has lots of big dreams of his own, he wanna go big but thrown in the circumstances and for the sake of the well being of others he adapted another path helping others in need. he managed to do it wonderfully when finally at a crucial juncture he broke down and wishes to take his life.

Nature intervenes to help him and make him realise through a guardian angel, how important his life is and how much difference his contribution has made. A beautiful movie, a must watch.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Life (1947) review

Posted : 11 years, 4 months ago on 25 December 2012 08:34

Frank Capra's more timeless films seem to be the caffeine of classic Hollywood. They're peppy, fun to consume and leave you with a positive buzz until the cold hard realities of your world set in.

One of the finest examples of this Capra rush is the holiday classic "It's A Wonderful Life". The film adroitly tells the story of small-town hero George Bailey and the many lives he touches. It also throws in a miserable miser and an extended dream sequence ripped off from Dickens but does so in a way that almost outclasses "A Christmas Carol". Instead of spending time with a bitter old man you spend time with a genuinely kind soul as the world slowly crushes his spirit before building it back up again in a flurry of joy. The turns by James Stewart and Donna Reed are captivating in their kindness and humor. There is also some memorable supporting roles for the great Lionel Barrymoore and Gloria Grahame but the real star is the gloriously uplifting script. Sure, there are some cloying Hee-Haw moments and you don't get the satisfaction of seeing that miserable miser get his but the unfettered anti-cynicism is refreshing and makes this Capra's finest film this side of It Happened One Night.


0 comments, Reply to this entry


« Prev12 Next »