Login
First of all say that the movie is not at all original and adds nothing to the genre just repeating the same premises of the usual film director, ie, the appearance of unknown virus which recover the dead mass life: the respective hunters and bloodthirsty zombies; closures in homes, etc..
Despite the repetition in the presentation of situations - changing only its scenery - as well as his notorious predictability, the vision of "Diary of the Dead" is entertaining and, at least, fails to be laughable. The closest thing to deserve this term, by far, the general interpretation. It is a great lack of the film only approve one of its actors. But the worst and the head of this folly is generally endorsed by the implausibility of its staging. The group travels protagonist fleeing from the burning, from one place to another, but suffering casualties of lovers and friends along the way and hardly seen in them some brief excitement over these events, in the same way that the appearance of zombies not alters just as if it were a round alcohol and other young people find more drunk than they are. This is not to get into specifics.
Again, although it is a resource that is increasingly used for this genre and the like, the idea of presenting the film as a personal filming its protagonists are, appreciating their complexity, very well done. This, coupled with his undeniable good bill and on interest in their development, that "Diary of the Dead" deserves to be seen by fans of the genre.
5/10
