Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

An average movie

Posted : 8 years, 6 months ago on 23 October 2015 08:03

In 2015, they finally released a new sequel for this franchise but, to be honest, I never expected it to become so huge. Indeed, even though a new Star Wars installment is coming up in the next months, there is a good chance that this sequel will turn out to be the highest grossing movie released for that year. Anyway, almost 20 years ago, after the smashing success of the first installment, it wasn’t really surprising that they would come up with a new sequel and since Steven Spielberg was back in the directing chair, there was some hope that it would be a pretty good blockbuster. Well, eventually, I really didn't like this flick and I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing. I mean, of course, there were some impressive action scenes but, in my opinion, it was such an idiotic story. To be honest, I don’t think that the plot was already  the strongest aspect of the first installment but there were many elements which compensated this resulting in something really entertaining. It  wasn’t the case here and I thought that the whole thing was big, loud, kind of stupid and most of the time rather tedious to watch. To conclude, even though it might sound surprising, I actually prefer the 3rd installment and I don’t think this first sequel was any good but you might end up enjoying it more than I did. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Deserves more credit than it gets

Posted : 10 years, 8 months ago on 29 August 2013 02:10

"Oh, yeah. Oooh, ahhh, that's how it always starts. Then later there's running and screaming."

To this day, 1993's Jurassic Park stands as one of the all-time greatest blockbusters in history, and its impact on popular culture cannot be overstated. With its Tyrannosaurus-sized box office returns and a bevy of critical acclaim, a sequel was inevitable, yet a follow-up would always be risky due to its predecessor's esteemed reputation. On top of this, 1997's The Lost World: Jurassic Park found director Steven Spielberg at the helm of a film for the first time since winning an Oscar for Schindler's List. Suffice it to say, The Lost World is not the knockout sequel many had hoped for, as it's not as intelligent or thoughtful as the first movie. Nevertheless, taken by itself, this is a skilfully-crafted rollercoaster, showing once again that Spielberg is practically unmatched when it comes to excitement, action and suspense.


Set several years after the events of the first movie, chaos theory mathematician Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) is approached by billionaire entrepreneur John Hammond (Richard Attenborough) with a proposition. As it turns out, there is more than one island inhabited by dinosaurs - there's a "Site B," where the creatures are free to run wild. And Hammond wants a team of scientists to visit the island to study the animals. Although Malcolm outright refuses, he learns that his palaeontologist girlfriend, Sarah Harding (Julianne Moore), is already on the island, which compels him to reconsider. With the help of documentary producer Nick Van Owen (Vince Vaughn) and engineer Eddie Carr (Richard Schiff), Malcolm travels to the wilds of Jurassic Park to rescue Sarah. Complicating matters is that Hammond's company, In-Gen, is now run by his shifty nephew Peter Ludlow (Arliss Howard), who authorises an expedition to transport dinosaurs from Site B back to the mainland to create a new amusement park. And, of course, the dinosaurs begin to run amok, decreasing everyone's chances of survival.

The Lost World unfortunately lacks its predecessor's thematic undercurrents. The 1993 movie delved into scientific hubris, gene splicing, DNA research, natural selection and the philosophy of man vs. nature. On the other hand, this sequel is less sophisticated - it's more of a B-grade monster action movie. It is fine in this sense, but the script could have used a few more revisions. Character behaviour is sometimes dumb - an experienced hunter manages to get lost by taking a few steps off the trail to relieve himself, and another hunter listens to music through a pair of headphones despite being on a dinosaur-infested island. There are also a handful of awkward moments, including an opening sequence that doesn't quite gel, and a jarring transition between said opening scene and the reintroduction of Malcolm. Not to mention, it's borderline cringe-worthy to see a teen battling raptors with gymnastics moves.


Although the screenplay by David Koepp is technically an adaptation of Michael Crichton's novel of the same name, it has basically nothing in common with the source material, as Koepp creates his own story. Admittedly, The Lost World does borrow a few narrative beats from its predecessor, but Koepp throws in a sufficient amount of new material to keep it from being a simple rehash. Most notably, the film posits that T-Rexes are family-oriented creatures, as a plot point involves a baby Rex being taken away from its loving parents. Koepp's best contribution is allowing a T-Rex to stampede around San Diego, as we get to see what would happen if such a carnivorous beast was brought into human society. The story here is admittedly flimsy, though - most glaring is the lack of a strong motivation for Malcolm, Sarah, Nick and Eddie's trip to the island. Nevertheless, once the movie gets into an agreeable groove, it soars.

No matter the niggling problems with the imperfect screenplay, Spielberg's visual treatment of the material is undeniably sublime. Spielberg infuses The Lost World with a similar flavour to the first movie, foregrounding a sense of awe and a light-hearted adventure spirit. Sequels are often larger and more lavish affairs, and The Lost World does not disappoint, with the dinos being allotted far more screen-time here. The action set-pieces are a lot of fun to watch, showcasing Spielberg's superb flair for mise-en-scène. Lesser films these days use shaky, zoom-heavy photography and fast cutting, but Spielberg and cinematographer Janusz Kaminski employ smooth wide shots to great effect. Like its predecessor, The Lost World also gets dark from time to time; the body count is higher, and the PG-13 rating is earned due to the intensity of several death scenes. Fortunately, the special effects here are nothing short of spectacular. Although a handful of digital effects shots look slightly slipshod, ILM mostly improves on the quality of the CGI dinos from four years prior. Luckily, Spielberg heavily relies on animatronic dinosaurs from Stan Winston's team as opposed to just digitally-created beasts, and they look incredibly realistic in terms of movement and detail. Once again, we believe that the dinosaurs are alive. And John Williams' majestic score tops everything off.


Goldblum was easily the most memorable performer in the original film as the witty, wise-cracking Ian Malcolm. His return here is very welcome, and Goldblum embraces the opportunity - he infects Malcolm with a dry, intellectual wit, and the script gives him many caustic one-liners to disperse with gusto. Julianne Moore, meanwhile, acquits herself well as Sarah, and a young Vince Vaughn (long before he became a one-note funnyman) is decent enough. The standout is the late Pete Postlethwaite, who submits a memorable turn as determined hunter Roland Tembo. It's a great character, and Postlethwaite sunk his teeth into it. Attenborough also makes a strong impression as Hammond, while Joseph Mazzello and Ariana Richards show up for quick cameos to reprise their roles from the original movie.

The Lost World: Jurassic Park doesn't get the credit it deserves. As a standalone action-adventure with dinosaurs, it's an exciting and competently-crafted blockbuster. The cracks begin to show only when it's placed alongside its top-flight predecessor. But even then, The Lost World gets credit for not simply rehashing the 1993 original, as it introduces enough innovation into the series to make it a worthwhile follow-up. Not everything works, and it doesn't reach the dizzying heights of the first film, but it's a solidly enjoyable action-adventure that never bores despite its 130-minute runtime, which is an achievement in itself. It confidently fits the bill of summer popcorn entertainment. And it has aged commendably, with special effects that are still just as convincing all these years later.

7.7/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Review of The Lost World: Jurassic Park

Posted : 11 years ago on 28 April 2013 11:40

The Lost World, the first sequel to 1993's Jurassic Park is an exhausting, thinly scripted film, that depends entirely on it's action sequences and special effects. Now that I've got the critique out of the way, let me just say that I had a blast watching The Lost World, the rare sequel that improves on the original. The Lost World may be missing some of the majesty and inventiveness of it's predecessor, but The Lost World is more fun, and the dinos are just as thrilling the second time around.

4 unfortunate souls make the dangerous decision to go to Isla Sorna to observe and document the dinosaurs living on the island. Among those five are Ian Malcolm, who had been to the island before, and had been nearly killed as a result of the reptilian beasts. He's hesitant to return, but his mind is made up when he discovers his girl friend, Sarah, is already at the island. And the plot thickens further when it's discovered thatone of Ian's daughters, Kelly, manages to stow away to the treacherous place. And when the group discovers that a rival team of considerably more people have also shown up on the island (with more greedy plans in mind), it doesn't take long for the dinosaurs to show their faces.

It hardly matters why these individuals have decided to come back to Jurassic Park. The plot is thin, so we're hardly given reasons for why this ill-fated group are choosing to set foot on the island. The obvious lack of story and the forced nature of this sequel is bothersome initially. But once the ball gets rolling, it's nothing but sheer entertainment value.

Like the original, The Lost World has a painfully slow start. Obligatory appearances of cast members from the first film and some echoes of John Williams iconic score is all there is to entertain one during the first while. And an awful lot of talking. Seriously, for a film with so little plot, I'm not sure why so much time had to be spent in discussion.

At any rate, the fun starts much sooner in this film. The pace picks up a bit about 40 minutes in, but right around the 50 minute mark, The Lost World fires all cylinders and doesn't look bad. Utterly terrifying and remarkably suspenseful, I had a big silly grin on my face for a majority of the action.

Admittedly, The Lost World has a few gimmicks. For one, there are two Tyrannosaurs this time around. Twice the dinos means twice the fun, right? Well, not necessarily, but the added dinos were certainly welcome.

Don't like being scared? This film isn't for you. Don't like seeing people in horrifying peril? This film isn't for you. Do you insist on some emotional depth or intellectual stimulation when you watch an action flick? Then once again, this film probably isn't for you. But if you kick back and relax, and just turn off your brain, this is one wild ride.

Still, the run time is a bit excessive. The Lost World lasts 2 hours and 10 minutes, and I was left pretty exhausted after the first 100 minutes. So while the last half hour is perfectly thrilling, and still plenty of fun, it also felt a bit unnecessary, and a bit tacked on.

The characters, like the original, aren't particularly developed. After all, they're not the main attraction here. But for the most part, they're likeable when they need to be, and unlikeable when they need to be (though there are exceptions...).

The acting is unimpressive, but serviceable. The actors only need to use some big words to describe the equipment they're using, and be able to show obvious signs of terror. As a result, the actors easily fit into their roles, though I couldn't help but hope for more impressive performances considering the talented players here; Jeff Goldblum, Pete Postlethwaite, Vince Vaughn, etc. Richard Attenborough brings plenty of charm to his character though, reprising his role as John Hammond from the original. Still, his part he is extremely small.

The special effects has held up well. They look just as good as the ground breaking effects in the original (though they're not quite as innovative the second time around). With more dinosaurs this time around, and more complex action sequences, the special effects team likely had their hands full. It all looks great, though.

John William's score, while lacking the iconic nature and grand scale of the original, is still good enough. It's certainly by-the-numbers Williams (and his new theme is completely forgettable), but it still manages to capture the spirit of the film. And fragments of the original themes do find their way into the film, so listen for them.

This being my second visit to Jurassic Park, I knew what to expect. Lots of dinosaurs, moments of awe at the beginning, moments of terror everywhere after that, and stupid humans thinking they can control it all. I even made a few light-hearted attempts at guessing those who wouldn't live to see the end credits (I actually got most of my guesses right). But that may be the biggest issue for some; The Lost World doesn't do much to differentiate itself from the original. Still, considering how much fun the original was, that didn't bother me too much.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Lost World: Jurassic Park review

Posted : 11 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2012 11:40

In my review of The Jurassic Park, I ended it by saying
In conclusion, I like Jurassic Park but I enjoy the sequel more.

Well, I take back my words because I found the sequel to be even more boring than the first. First off, none of the scenes involving dinosaurs seemed plausible or the least bit entertaining. I mean the part where two T. Rex's attack Ian Malcolm and company still remains a total joke and cliche and not the least bit enjoyable and don't get me started when Ian, Kelly & Sarah get attacked by the two Velociraptors. Not very convincing enough and I could swear the actors were laughing on the inside.

The inclusion of the character, Kelly, was painful and even though I have nothing against the actress, her performance was sub-par and her character wasn't memorable or anything. Julianne Moore is always interesting to watch but I'm afraid this isn't one of her better moments. She didn't connect to her character and therefore, could not connect to the audience, or at least to me. But however, even bad films have redeeming qualities and it goes by the name of Pete Postlethwaite. Director Steven Spielberg called him the greatest actor ever and I can't help but agree. He was truly classic in his role and the character has now become one of my favourites. True, he never was in my top 10 but this performance is worthy of being noticed. Another redeeming quality is giving Ian Malcolm a central role in this film, as opposed to a supporting in the previous. I liked Jeff Goldblum's performance and his character remained the best. Further going, I also liked Vince Vaughn in his role but the worst part was that just as I was beginning to like the character, he disappeared!

So, entertainment-wise, this won't give you much but for some silly, irrational fun, it has plenty to offer. I guess I have to watch the third part now and if I don't like that either, the franchise is just not for me, sorry!

6.5/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Lost World: Jurassic Park review

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 05:54

I hadn't seen this movie for a few years so I was just going off of some scenes that I had remembered. That's what this movie is good for a cool scene here and there. This Jurassic Park film didn't give much for the viewer to care about. We were suddenly tossed into a world where Malcolm (the suave playboy that was hitting on Grant's woman in the first JP) is going steady with Julianne Moore, and has a bi-racial daughter. Then it all moves so quickly with him being coaxed into visiting a second...yes, a second site where the dinosaurs were being kept. Besides certain cool scenes this movie was lacking a good writer, someone that could have worked better on 1) the characters and 2) the concept. I am a fan of the first Jurassic Park so it's disappointing that The Lost World could not follow up the first properly. The re-watch value is pretty decent considering this is like the third time I've seen the movie since it's release. But the viewings are spaced apart drastically to the point where it's failings seem to have faded in my mind. But once you watch it, you realize that it's not as good as the first movie, and that it's kind of lame. It's a disappointment to a true movie fan. But some viewers may enjoy it simply for the dinosaur action.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Jurrassic Park 2? Since when?

Posted : 16 years, 9 months ago on 14 August 2007 03:44

Now I recently acquired the books for free, from a giveaway thing. So I read the first and enjoyed it, then I read the second and LOVED it. I simply loved the character of Dr. Levine, and the kids. I imagined parts in the book on the main screen, like when the raptor sniffs the rapper and slowly looks up, scowling. But did I see that? No. Did I even see Levine? No. Arby? No.

Don't get me wrong, it was an ok movie, but what happened? The book was awesome, and it didn't need to be changed. The saddest part is that they still grabbed characters and ideas from the book, but that's about it.

All in all, it is a decent movie. Good plot, good acting, good everything, just somewhat disappointing in my opinion.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

something survived, all right...

Posted : 17 years, 4 months ago on 8 January 2007 09:09

I read the book first, and got excited about the movie coming out. Like most other adaptations, they can't put every single detail into the movie, and the one thing that I really wanted to see was one of those things.

There was a dino that had chameleon genes, so it was able to change color to match the environment (in case you weren't aware). How great would that've been on the big screen? Other than that, it was a pretty good movie with a lot of the same well-developed characters and action that you'd expect from a Crichton/Spielberg movie.


0 comments, Reply to this entry