Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Son of the Mask review

Posted : 7 months ago on 28 September 2023 07:44

Soulless, unfunny, ugly dog shit that is emblematic of studios thinking they know what it takes to make a good movie. The results are worse than you can imagine. That is all.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The dumbest movie of the year

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 31 December 2013 05:01

Just what the hell is this? Is this another crappy sequel to a great movie? 'Son of the Mask' is the dumbest movie of the year! There's absolutely nothing good about this flick

A sequel to the Jim Carrey movie 'The Mask', the sequel has barely anything to do with the mask! There's more awfulness, crudeness and unfunny comedy than scenes of the mask! The entire cast is obnoxious and infact it's an entirely new cast! None of the original cast return!

This isn't like a sequel at all! It's got an entirely new cast, a new plot, barely anything to do with the mask and just about everything else is wrong with this awful movie!

0/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Am I from a different planet?

Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 26 May 2012 07:04

Series note: As this is not a direct, chapter-like continuation of The Mask (1994), one can easily watch either film first.

If I ever needed proof that I'm looking for something different in a film than most folks, here it is. While I don't think Son of the Mask is flawless, the only flaw I can really see is that the flow of the story doesn't quite make it as enrapturing or emotionally impactful as, say, Schindler's List (1993) or The Shawshank Redemption (1994). Two factors mitigate that lack. One, Son of the Mask isn't shooting for the same compelling emotional intensity as a film like Schindler's List. Two, Son of the Mask's other outstanding artistic qualities enable it to largely transcend any problems it has with achieving a spellbinding plot.

Of course, related to point one above, it's not that every film needs to have a paradigm-shattering plot to succeed. The Godfrey Reggio/Philip Glass trilogy of Koyaanisqatsi (1983), Powaqqatsi (1988) and Naqoyqatsi (2002) all receive scores of 9 or 10 from me, and debatably they have no plots, even if they make many cogent, often philosophical, "arguments" about culture.

But it's not that Son of the Mask's story isn't good. The plot is set in the same location--the fictional Edge City--as the first Mask (as well as John Arcudi and Doug Mahnke's comic books, upon which both films are based). The story could take place either before or after the beloved Jim Carrey film. Tim Avery (Jamie Kennedy) lives in the bucolic countryside that's ironically only two miles outside of Edge City (it seems almost like a northeastern New Jersey, Westchester County or southwestern Connecticut joke). The mask of Loki, the "God of mischief" in Norse mythology, comes floating down a stream, to be found by Tim's dog, Otis (in an alliterative reference to Odin, Loki's father, and a pun on Milo and Otis). Tim puts it on just in time for a Halloween party, which enables him to get in the good graces of both his boss, played by comedian Steven Wright, and his wife, Tonya (Traylor Howard). Prior to this, Tim was having trouble at work as a struggling animator relegated to giving studio tours dressed up as a giant tortoise, and his wife was nagging him about having a baby.

Meanwhile, we get to meet Loki himself (played by Alan Cumming) in a fabulous prologue set in a museum. It seems that he's lost his mask (of course) and Odin (an almost unrecognizable Bob Hoskins) is nagging him to find it. Tim's masked persona enables him to get a promotion and procreate, but the baby just may metaphysically be the son of Loki, and Loki exploits this fact to try to find his mask.

Although it sounds complex, perhaps, that's a more than attractive story to me. It actually trumps the first Mask film in a way by bringing the source of the mask into the proceedings. It's highly fantastical and surreal, and it enables a great number of deeper themes and subtexts. To a large extent, Son of the Mask is a film about fatherhood. It explores the fears and foibles that many fathers and fathers-to-be experience. The resolution to the film's dilemmas--and director Lawrence Guterman adeptly maintains two primary dilemmas throughout--hinge on learning how to be a better father. But there are other important themes and subtexts, including the importance of personal assertiveness (carried over from the themes of the first film), the quandaries of dual career families, "sibling" rivalry, child development issues, and maybe even the beginnings of an Oedipal complex.

Not that this is primarily a serious film, but it's not meant to be only or primarily a laugh-out-loud comedy, either. Guterman is much more concerned with achieving a thoroughgoing surrealism than he is with trying to make you laugh. I love surrealism, so I'm a prime candidate to love this film. In fact, I can't imagine anyone with a taste for surrealism not appreciating the film, at least to an extent.

The production design--including things like the sets, matte paintings, costumes, and the ubiquitous cgi--is simply amazing. The surreal action sequences are even better. Perhaps even more than the first film, Son of the Mask realizes a "live action" cartoon.

Tex Avery is again a strong reference (made obvious by Kennedy's character being named "Tim Avery" and working as an animator), as is classic Warner Brothers animation in general. A long section in the middle is a clever spoof on Chuck Jones' One Froggy Evening (1955), and there is another long section that is straight out of the Roadrunner cartoons (involving Otis first drawing up blueprints then trying to execute an elaborate, almost Rube Goldbergian "elimination contraption").

The funniest aspect of the movie for me, perhaps, was a kind of "suspended absurdity", made most clear when Tonya returns from her business trip and finds her home (which was subtly modeled after cartoon homes circa the 1940s and 1950s) still in shambles from the cartoonish events that preceded--the piano is still hanging from the top of the stairs, the giant boxing glove is still engaged, and so on.

But the performers have many funny moments, too. Although Kennedy has a couple moments of Jim Carrey-like mannerisms when Tim is The Mask, and these underscore that Kennedy can't do Carrey like Carrey can (of course), these are few and far between. Kennedy is Tim as Tim for most of the film, and funny at that. Alan Cumming was hilarious in his different disguises when he's searching for his mask, and entertaining otherwise--he's impressed me in all of his films I've seen. I also found the baby frequently funny, especially when more surreal.

Giving Son of the Mask a 1 or 2 seems simply ridiculous to me, even if there are elements of the film you strongly dislike. Technically, at least, this is an exemplary work of art. It deserves to be reconsidered.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Son of the Mask review

Posted : 12 years, 8 months ago on 25 August 2011 05:48

Ouh im so happy... never seen this.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 12 January 2011 02:47

Obviously, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but, eventually, I always end up watching those really awful flicks just to check if there are indeed as bad as they seem to be. On top of that, my step-son has some kind of obsession with sequels so we just had to watch this flick at some point. Anyway, it indeed lived to its reputation and the whole thing was competely moronic and not entertaining whatsoever. It’s interesting to point out that many successful comedies starring Jim Carrey got some sequels or prequels without involving him whatsoever (see also ‘Evan Almighty’, ‘Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd’) and those 3 flicks were all terribly misguided and some major flops at the box-office. To be honest, I have always had a weak spot for ‘The Mask’, even though it was nothing really revolutionary, it was a fun and very well made flick and, considering the material, there was definitely some potential for at least one decent sequel. Apparently, Jim Carrey was in fact offered up to $10 million to come back in a sequel but he turned it down because he thought that reprising a character was not challenging enough… Anyway, to conclude, this flick was just abysmal, it is probably one of the worst sequels ever made and it is definitely not worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Poopy Mask

Posted : 13 years, 6 months ago on 21 October 2010 01:38

Mask was awesome..Lord knows why they had to ruin it with this garbage.
First of all, there's no JIM CARREY! That makes the character and film! He's the only person that could do it. Such a shame.
The whole plot to the film, does not go with the Mask's character and is really lame. People need to NOT watch this, waste of time. It's like a freaking Lifetime film..ugh. Plus Kal penn is in it..he's a horrible actor. Plays the same roles..Why was this made..tisk tisk tisk.

Likes: None other than I was glad that the horror ended.

Rating: 1.3/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry