Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Piranha 3D review

Posted : 9 years, 10 months ago on 29 June 2014 03:31

Going into it I wasn't expecting a good movie but there are enough funny moments and ridiculousness to make it enjoyable. On top of that Kelly Brooke is stunning


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 10 June 2012 01:45

Before watching this flick, I wasn't expecting much but, at least, I thought it would be a fun watch. First of all, I have to give some credit to Alexandre Aja. Indeed, I heard about the damned thing and I thought there would be loads of boobs and gore but they really went all the way, with lots of nudity and some nasty gore scenes. Still, even though my step-son apparently really loved it, I can't say I really cared for this movie though. Indeed, I was eventually rather bored during the whole thing and, as far as I was concerned, it was never really funny or scary. To make things worse. I didn't care about any of the characters so it was rather difficult to get into the story. Of course, I know, I shouldn't take this movie seriously but, still, if you compare it to 'Jaws, it was rather weak. Like I said before, my step-son who is 15 years old really enjoyed it and I'm maybe too old to appreciate a movie with naked chicks and blood-thirsty fishes. I have nothing against these things but I still need a compelling story and some more or less interesting characters. Anyway, to conclude, it was rather boring and it is not really worth a look in my opinion.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Boobs, Blood & Doc Brown.

Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 24 May 2012 02:28

An underwater tremor unleashes thousands of hungry Piranha that have thought to have been extinct for millions of years. Bad timing, because it's Spring Break.

Piranha was, what some people called, a rip off of Jaws. Another person wanting a piece of the pie. It went on to have a sequel, to be directed by the now famous James Cameron and it seems that it is time for a remake, in 3D no less. Do we need a remake? Probably not, but the film is fun and excessively violent, which makes for a good time for those looking for b- movie horror goodness. Piranha delivers on the levels it aims for, take that as you want to.

Alexandre Aja directs this film, let's just forget he did Mirrors okay? He gets the bloody mess off to an interesting start by having Richard Dreyfuss in the film. A nod to Jaws no doubt, but one can only assume that he had him in here to say that this film is either a: More scarier or B: More dangerous. I'd go with the latter because the film isn't scary. What's more dangerous though? One shark, or thousands of Piranhas? You pick.

So it's Spring Break, so the fish have hundreds of young drunk teenagers to eat, and boy do they eat. The film doesn't shy away from the bloody truth. Piranha's can strip a cow to it's bones in minutes, these guys are more aggressive. They've been feeding off each other for millions of years and now they have a variety of meat to pick from. Yummy. So people die in bloody, over the top, funny ways. The film is one for the people who cheer when someone has their legs torn off. If that's not you, you might want to stay away from this one.

Also, if you're not a fan of naked women, you might want to stay away from this one. This film is full of naked women, left right and centre. There is even an underwater naked swimming dance sequence set to opera music. It's weird and funny at the same time because it comes out of nowhere.

The film could have used more of it's cast. We have Richard Dreyfuss, Ving Rhames, Christopher Lloyd and Eli Roth. All of them are underused. Rhames, I thought was going to have a more hero type role, he doesn't. Roth has a total of maybe two scenes as does Lloyd. Dreyfuss only shows up at the beginning of the film. Once again, an interesting cast that is not put to good use. The film decides to stick with the blood and boobs.

The film is in 3D. I expected to have more fun with it than I did. Although I did enjoy it more than other 3D films I've seen. It has a more gimmicky feel to it and it actually fits with the film. Seeing bits of Piranha fly up at you is fun. Boobs in 3D, fish in 3D but the things that were used the most were the underwater coral reefs.

The theatre lost power near the end, so the last 3 or so minutes of the film we saw with no sound, but I could tell what was going to happen, even with the lack of audio. I'm not letting that affect my review for the film, but I can sense that the film was going to go for one of those jump-scare-abrupt endings.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Piranha 3D review

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 1 February 2011 01:56

Splatter flicks of the 1970s and 80s tend to have a real fun factor to them, as opposed to darker gore films like the 'Saw' franchise. Once in a while a group of filmmakers will attempt to homage those films, some succeeding and others not. Peter Jackson blew us away with his 'Dead Alive,' which piles on the blood, guts, and goo to the point of being hysterical. There have been some pretty graphic Horror films since, but who knew that the remake of the 1978 Joe Dante cult classic would rival Jackson's over-the-top gorefest? We're not talking about great art here people, but pure and simple trashy Horror fun like we haven't seen on the big screen in some time.

Pros: The cast does it's best with the minimal material they have. Lots of gorgeous underwater and above water photography. Apart from one section of the film, the pace just zips along. Goods special and visual effects. Ample amounts of blood and gore. Also some great gore gags. Made with a real sense of fun. Occasionally pretty funny. The massacre sequence is actually pretty terrifying and stomach churning.

Cons: With a movie like this you don't expect brilliant writing, but it still could have been better. Plot is almost non-existent. There's a section of the film which includes divers going into an underwater cavern and the filming of a "Girls Gone Wild" style video above that really drags. Goes by so fast and is so short that there's no room for any real tension, which would have given the film some extra oomph.

Final thoughts: This film seems to have come at the right time. Not a bad way to end the summer. Sure it's all pretty mindless, maybe too much so, but who doesn't enjoy a good 90 minutes of pure bloody goofy fun now and again?


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Basically, Jaws mixed with Shaun Of The Dead. FUN!

Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 17 September 2010 01:11

Seriously, what was everyone expecting from this film? I think pretty much all the same things! I'll give you a few: women in bikinis, seeing their breasts and asses, gore regarding the piranhas and suspense! And that is exactly what this film got but something a bit more than that. I just had zero interest at all to watch it on the brink of its release but after watching it, I am surprised that I decided not to watch it. I guess it possibly being utter crap and a waste of time put me off the film but when I just suddenly watched it, it surprisingly entertained me throughout the whole time.


This is the second remake of the original 1978 version (first one was a 1995 adaptation of the same name) and now I think that this new one turned out more of a success both critically and box office ratings more than the first remake. I guess, the fact the new one was released in 3D gave it a slight push ahead. I mean, if this remake works in 3D and does a good job, I could see them doing a future 3D remake of something like Anaconda or Lake Placid but not too many because they'll just suck and fail for trying too hard.


There were lots of intense suspense that was a bit like Jaws. Piranha 3D did take a lot from that film regarding that but it wasn't an awful attempt. What I mean by this is we see point-of-view shots of the piranhas when see people's feet, legs or even whole body in the water like the piranhas are going to attack (like we see through the eyes of the shark in Jaws like the classic opening scene and the attack on the beach the next day). The poster is just like the Jaws poster as well. Alexandre Aja (director of 2006 The Hills Have Eyes remake) did a surprisingly brilliant job and filmed it well both underwater and on land. After reading a couple of reviews, critics and fans have said that ''this is what Snakes On A Plane should have been.''


I wasn't familiar with most of the actors involved in this film except three (Richard Dreyfuss (previously starred in Jaws. So many connections Piranha 3D has with that film), Christopher Lloyd and Ving Rhames (starred in Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction) but the acting was very good from those who were under attack by the piranhas and the wounded ones but I thought that some of the young people like the two girls on the boat were a bit shit and just lacked character development. I liked Jake's character because he's just another teenager who wants to go out and have fun like most teens do but his mum is the sheriff and has asked him to look after the children but he doesn't want to. Not going to spoil anymore so you'll have to see for yourself.


It is obviously a very cheesy, soppy plot but the suspense and the dark comedy involved did save the film. I suppose you could say that Piranha 3D has the comedy humour and sometimes the unnecessary violence like Shaun Of The Dead. That film did manage to pull something surprisingly smart off and I think that Piranha 3D somehow managed to as well. There are lots and lots of moments where you could just disgustingly laugh at the gore within the film like you could in Shaun Of The Dead. Despite the very basic and simple story, it features a surprisingly shocking twist that would interest the audience a lot more for the upcoming sequel in 2012.


This is perhaps the first gory horror film to be released in 3D and I regrettably never got chance to see it in 3D but the experience in normal 2D was pretty damn terrifying! I think if there perhaps wasn't that much gore at all it would have reached the ultimate fail level in 3D. Seriously now I can only imagine how terrifying it must have been in 3D with a large screen and piranhas and guts popping out the screen! I'm going to definitely be up for that in the sequel. Stepping aside the original 1978 Piranha film, I'd say that Piranha 3D is like Jaws mixed with Shaun Of The Dead. This is what entertainment is all about!


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Fun, campy late-summer schlock

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 13 September 2010 10:58

"The piranha hunt in packs. The first bite draws blood, blood draws the pack."


Piranha 3D is a comedy-horror flick that delivers precisely what it promises on the label: bikinis, boobs, gore and killer fish. A comfortably-budgeted update of the 1978 Roger Corman film, this late-summer instance of schlock cinema is a sensorial assault which stretches out of the screen via 3-D effects to inundate audiences with enough blood and gore to make George A. Romeo's zombie films look positively tame. In essence, the makers of Piranha 3D took the general idea of killer fish attacking members of the human populace, and joyously cranked up the carnage level as high as they could (or as high as the MPAA permitted them). The script is credited to Peter Goldfinger and Josh Stolberg (Sorority Row), but, frankly, it would be surprising if the script was jotted down on anything other than a napkin.



The slender plot unfolds during Spring Break at the fictional Lake Victoria in the Arizona desert, where thousands of scantily clad college students are gathering for a week in the hot sun of getting drunk, getting naked and partying. Keeping all the rambunctious young party animals in line is Sheriff Julie Forester (Shue), who learns that an earthquake has opened up the bottom of the lake. Said earthquake has permitted a swarm of prehistoric piranhas the opportunity to feast on the party animals. A few additional subplots aside concerning characters you probably won't care about, that's all there is to Piranha 3D. Literally, the film feels like it entirely eschews a third act, as it instead ends with a cliffhanger to signal that a sequel is coming down the pipeline.


To be sure, Piranha 3D is thematically vacant and completely surface-level. Every character is a stick figure, the dialogue is bad, and the acting is cheesy, yet these elements are campy enough to let the viewers know that the filmmakers were in on the joke. For B-movie fans, there's little that the film fails to provide. On the other hand, those who prefer more straight-faced horror will likely be irritated by the at times campy disposition. However, with that said, director Alexander Aja still found time to employ shock tactics. Thus, there are portions which seem intended to be taken seriously, but there's still plenty of humour and winks nonetheless. Most interesting are the armada of Jaws references (for those unaware, the original 1978 Piranha owed a lot to Jaws). Underwater shots depicting the POV of the piranhas are present, while strains of John Williams' iconic Jaws music were used, and Richard Dreyfuss makes a cameo. Dreyfuss' role is not Matt Hooper (like in Jaws), but he is named Matt and he does sing Show Me the Way to Go Home. Sly dialogue references are present, as well.



Because the gaggle of characters are as deep as a typical Uwe Boll movie, the first half of Piranha 3D is admittedly too slow-going. Once the prehistoric piranhas begin to attack, though, the film at long last hits its stride. The remaining forty minutes or so are a no-holds-barred, action-packed parade of gore, boobs, spilled guts and severed body parts. Clearly, Aja had an absolute ball devising countless unthinkably gruesome ways for people to be eaten. Meanwhile, a bunch of the film's best moments involve Aja relying more on tension than gore - the murky underwater shots afford the material a genuinely creepy atmosphere. However, the shock value of hot young bathers being reduced to fish food at times overshadows the campy sensibility of the enterprise, especially because veteran Howard Berger's make-up effects are all too convincing. It would appear that Berger and the digital effects artists were not in sync, as the CGI is constantly shoddy, cheesy and cartoonish. The results are baffling, as several of the piranha attack sequences are disturbing rather than light-hearted and satisfying.


Of course, it would not be Piranha 3D without the 3-D aspect, but it would be more enjoyable and easier on the wallet. Once again, a 2010 release has been visually damaged by a shoddy 3-D conversation (though the film was always intended to be a 3-D release). As a result of the conversion, the opening credits are virtually unreadable, and there are scenes that are blurry and indistinct. At least it's not as bad as Clash of the Titans, mind you.



A primary strength of Piranha 3D is Christopher Lloyd's scene-stealing role as the excitable fish expert who's called upon to explain the prehistoric piranha infestation. Lloyd threw himself into the role of a crazed professor with glee; chewing up his lines with every bit as vigour as the on-screen nasties. Echoes of Doc Brown from Back to the Future are evident as well. It's also worth noting that the film contains a scene in which Ving Rhames kills a tonne of piranhas using a boat propeller and a shotgun. It's pretty badass. All things considered, Piranha 3D is a generally fun, ridiculous gore-fest. It's far from perfect and could have been tweaked in a few areas, yet it's still a great ride.

6.2/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry