Moulin Rouge! Reviews
Beautiful Parisian Extravaganza!
Posted : 2 years, 1 month ago on 28 March 2022 02:100 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 3 August 2015 09:05I already saw this movie but since it was such a long time ago, I thought I might as well check it out again. I remember it very well when it was released, it was at the time a big critical success, by far Baz Luhrmannâs biggest success so far, but, to be honest, I actually had a hard time to connect with the damned thing. I mean, sure, visually, it was really impressive and, like most of the movies directed by Luhrmann, it was quite an explosion of colors and kinetic shots. Furthermore, Nicole Kidman was pretty much at the top of her game at the time and she was just perfectly cast. Still, the first 20 minutes was just an endless chaos, some kind of Bollywood musical on acid, and, as far as I was concerned, it was barely watchable. Fortunately, it did slow down a bit afterwards and they finally could focus more on Satine and Christian but, still, I canât say I was really blown away by the whole thing. I mean, there are only a handful of musicals which actually managed to really touch me and the reason why is that most of them, instead of focusing on the plot or the characters involved, would just keep throwing some rather random songs. This movie is not an exception and I thought that the whole thing was rather shallow. Anyway, to conclude, even if Iâm not a huge fan, it is still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
an experience you won't forget
Posted : 10 years, 10 months ago on 18 June 2013 08:58What I did like were the visuals and the costumes! I think Moulin Rouge would have been better if I saw it in theatre. A small screen is not advantageous for this movie. I also liked the performances. Ewan McGregor, Nicole Kidman and John Lequizamo (He sounds exactly like he does in Ice Age) were great, but I think Jim Broadbent had the best performance. Why didn't he receive an Oscar nomination for Moulin Rouge? Well, apparently he did receive a nomination for another movie that same year and won.
So to conclude, I thought this was a visually stunning movie with wonderful performances, but a great story and quite scenes were absent.
Singing in the Rain remains my favorite musical movie.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
Moulin Rouge!
Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 20 November 2010 02:31Ewan McGregor is a penniless writer who gets swept up in the bohemian mini-revolution that painter Toulouse-Lautrec (John Leguizamo) introduces him to. You see, McGregor has moved into an apartment directly below Toulouse and his oddball set. One day an narcoleptic Argentian comes crashing through his roof, and so begins the proper story of how McGregor becomes Rodolfo to Nicole Kidmanâs Mimi. She is a performer in a nightclub who also whores herself out when it is most opportune to the dreams and aspirations of her character and her surrogate fatherâs, Zidler (Jim Broadbent). Meet cutes, mistaken identities, characters who wear their names and descriptions on their sleeves, and a villain who is completely dislikable. The Duke, played to over-the-top lunacy by Richard Roxburgh, exists solely to stand in the way our of two main heroes/lovers, and to provide the money thatâll make Kidmanâs showgirl-cum-actress dreams come true. Each characterization is paper thin, but deeply complicated characters with rich nuance and subtleties never seem to be an aim within a lavish movie musical. Nor should they be. Musicals rely on simplicity in storytelling to ground the feverish, dreamlike qualities involved in characters spontaneously bursting into song mid-conversation.
Anachronistic and slightly anarchic in spirit, Moulin Rouge! technically takes place in an imagined Paris of 1899, but comes armed with contemporary songs, MTV generation-style quick editing and the spectacle of an old MGM musical. We are introduced to the titular club through a medley of Nirvanaâs âSmells Like Teen Spirit,â the remake of âLady Marmalade,â Fatboy Slimâs âBecause We Can-Can,â David Bowieâs âDiamond Dogsâ and snippets of numerous others. Visually, it is spliced and diced and seems to skip around on every syllable. Itâs pure visually anarchy, but it has been arranged and directed in such a way that it drops us into the kinetic world and lets us know exactly what kind of experience we are in for. Normally this kind of editing bothers me to no end, but it works and feels right for this film. It could be because we are being dropped into an operatic pastiche, a film which wears its motto as the only overriding theme and makes an argument for music being the universal language of love and the soul. This version of the Moulin Rouge is an underground sex club, Studio 54 chic and the wildest rave ever envisioned. It makes the anything-goes politically, sexually and intellectually cabaret of Cabaret look faintly tame by comparison.
I have spent a great deal of space and time describing the visual and auditory palette that the film plays with so wildly. Yes, the film is like glitter and bedazzles exploding during the first half before going into darker territory. But the greatness of the film would be nothing without a group of actors that commit themselves fully to embodying their archetypes. Who is the penniless but brilliant writer Christian but the channel through which the Bohemian ideals are to be viewed and processed? He is not a character in a normal sense; he is a conduit for the filmâs themes. McGregor easily nails the charm, jealousy, naivetĂ© and sophistication of the character. He can look boyish and youthful in his penniless duds, but also very well-groomed and classy in his tuxedos. It doesnât hurt that he can actually sing and dance. Heâs not Gene Kelly or Fred Astaire-level, but who is, really?
And who is Satine but the leggy red-head who is equal parts Rita Hayworth, Marilyn Monroe and Madonna? Sheâs a beautiful singer-dancer in the Moulin Rouge who also dabbles in the occasional whoring with dreams of becoming a real actress who dies of consumption at the very end. Itâs a hell of a part involving the character to go from high comedy to tear-stained melodrama within a two hour movie. Along the way are complicated and busy production numbers and a lot of singing. Nicole Kidman gives a titanic performance. She doesnât just nail it, but invests everything sheâs got into it. Her performance here almost makes her eventual Oscar win for The Hours look like an apology for losing out to Halle Berry. That line of reasoning isnât hampered by the fact that Kidman was nominated for this one year and then won the next. And theyâre given great support by Roxburgh as the Duke. He performs the role like a silent film (over) actor. The kind of which would glower and tie girls up the train tracks in-between title cards and twirling his mustache. It works for this film, but in another it would be a disaster. Itâs that fine balance and finding the correct tone. John Leguizamo and Jim Broadbent also swing pretty wide, with Leguizamo providing his own singing and Broadbent being dubbed. Both are incredibly diverse and highly talented actors.
I have talked a lot about how big and broad this movie is, how practically devoid of subtly it is, and those who know me know that things like this typically annoy me greatly. But I saw Moulin Rouge! at a tender age when it first hit theaters, and something within the post-modern glitter bomb reached into my soul and stayed there. It still holds an intoxicating and wondrous spell over me. Each time I watch it my heart soars with their love affair, Iâm always amazed breathless at the âElephant Love Medleyâ and stunned by âEl Tango de Roxanne,â and I never fail to tear up by the end. I know the beats by heart. I could practically recite the entire film from start to finish for you, but I always get swept up in the journey. Itâs a love-or-hate kind of film. I have loved it since the summer of 2001; I will love it until I die. I will defend it as the best movie of that year, and I will always claim it as a perfect film. Some movies just speak to us, and Moulin Rouge! speaks in a language that I understand. Itâs old fashioned Hollywood in many ways, so beautifully ornate, so frantic and kinetic, so modern. Itâs a contradiction.
This was the film that made me think of movies as something other than entertainments. This was the start of my exploration into film-as-art-form. It might seem funny to you, but it makes sense to me.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
Moulin Rouge! review
Posted : 13 years, 6 months ago on 11 November 2010 10:380 comments, Reply to this entry
Broke my heart this did!!
Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 24 January 2010 09:15Nicole Kidman's performance as Satine was phenomenal. She was the perfect choice for Satine because Nicole turned out to be a fantastic singer and is absolutely beautiful playing such a powerful, emotional character with a big heart. Nicole Kidman's performance is one of the best leading female performances ever in my opinion. I am starting to become interesting in Baz Luhrmann's collaboration with Nicole Kidman. I did like Australia but isn't as good as this one obviously. Ewan McGregor's performance is absolutely fantastic as well as Christian. Christian is a young writer who falls in love with Satine at first sight. Ewan is becoming one of my favourite actors now because I really love his performances in Trainspotting, Moulin Rouge!, Shallow Grave, Big Fish and the prequel Star Wars trilogy. I was surprised by how good McGregor turned out to be at singing. I did think he would do like a Pierce Brosnan in Mamma Mia! but he didn't at all. He would be good in more musicals but not an epic one like this one. McGregor has proven himself to be an actor who is able to pull off any kind of character. Supporting actors Jim Broadbent and John Leguizamo deliver really awesome performances was really awesome as well.
Baz Luhrmann is a really good director at creating epics especially romantic epics. He also did Australia starring Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman and Romeo And Juliet starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes which are other really good romantic epics. Australia flawed a little bit but Moulin Rouge! didn't in any way whatsoever. If Baz Luhrmann does another musical, I will be really annoyed with him. Baz Luhrmann's adaptation might seem like a remake to some people but it isn't really a remake. It just has the same title name. It is set around the same time but has different characters and story and most importantly the 2001 adaptation is a musical.
Moulin Rouge! is one of my very few films that have made me cry. It is a film that is stuffed with beauty and tragedy. I think Nicole Kidman's best and most famous films are Moulin Rouge! and Eyes Wide Shut. Ewan McGregor's performance was absolutely fantastic but Trainspotting is still his best film. It is Baz Luhrmann's best work and I think it always will be for me. Moulin Rouge! is the second best film of 2001 after The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring. Moulin Rouge! is a masterpiece that I was left speechless at and felt heartbroken by it. It inspired me a lot as well. It is a timeless classic for me and always will be.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
Not As Bad As It Should Be
Posted : 16 years ago on 26 April 2008 04:360 comments, Reply to this entry
Moulin Rouge! review
Posted : 16 years ago on 25 April 2008 09:14Courtisan Satine, of the Moulin Rouge falls in love with a poor writer Christian and a whirl-wind romance insues; which must be kept secret from 'The Duke' a client of Satine's and bank roller of the musical which will finally make her an actress.
I absolutely love the soundtrack to this album; the songs have replaced the 'power ballad' for my drunken outbursts. Most notably, what I love about this film is its ability to unify all of woman-kind. Furthermore Ewan Mcgregor and Nicole Kidman have remarkably good voices.
Moulin Rouge, chews up and spits out every other romance/rom-com ever made. Its the pinnacle of its genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
Very Fond of this Movie
Posted : 16 years, 9 months ago on 11 August 2007 04:050 comments, Reply to this entry