Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 24 May 2019 09:00

To be honest, since this movie doesn’t really have a stellar reputation, I didn’t have some really high expectations but I have to admit that I still wanted to check it out though. Well, even if it didn’t reach the level of the awesome ‘Steve Jobs’, I still think it was a decent watch though. Of course, I’m still not convinced that Ashton Kutcher was the best choice to play one of the most influential figures of the 20th century, even if he did look like Steve Jobs a little bit. However, the fact that I saw Danny Boyle’s version before actually made me appreciate more this movie somehow. Indeed, I really enjoyed a lot Boyle’s movie but it made me really curious to learn more about Jobs and that’s exactly what this movie provided. Sure, the whole thing was a really straightforward biopic but, at least, it was quite informative. Still, you might wonder if a TV mini-series or even a TV-show wouldn’t work better because there was so much ground to cover and it did create some pacing issues. For example, at some point, Jobs was kicked out of Apple but, then, maybe 5 minutes later, he was back there again. Even more problematic were the scenes during which Jobs was displayed as a major douchebag. Indeed, pretty much out of nowhere, they would show his darker side but, then, it would never last long enough to make a real impression. To make things worse, they would show right away some other bit arguing that the guy was such an amazing genius. Anyway, to conclude, even it it was nothing really amazing, it was still a fairly interesting movie and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Steve Jobs. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Jobs review

Posted : 10 years, 2 months ago on 3 March 2014 11:13

At first I was a little skeptical about Ashton Kutcher playing Steve Jobs because they don't really looking anything alike. Then I watched it anyways. I thought he actually pulled the part off really well and even looked fine as older Steve Jobs. The acting is pretty good from a pretty interesting cast that includes Dermot Mulroney, Josh Gad, Lukas Haas, Matthew Modine, J.K. Simmons, Kevin Dunn, James Woods, Amanda Crew, Samm Levine, and a few other familiar faces. I though this was a little like The Social Network though to be honest. This was pretty good don't get me wrong, but it had too much of a feel like Mark Zuckerberg's movie. Steve and Mark are both major assholes in these and they both have to do with computer things. So I believe it's hard not to make a comparison. Anyways I did enjoy this, but it was missing something or maybe had something it didn't need. Anyways this movie could be a hit or miss. See for yourself.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Rise & fall & rise back to rule what he'd created

Posted : 10 years, 5 months ago on 1 December 2013 07:17

Steve Jobs, the man behind the revolution of computer technology. It is hard to consider this movie as an inspiration movie because to me it looked more like a revenge story. It is a nice biopic of a mans rise and fall and rise back to the chair govern his creation.

It was a wonderful life journey of Steve Jobs with all the bad and good in the path of glory. It begins in 2001 where he introduces his new innovative product, a music player, an apple iPod and then takes us to the 70s to tell his earlier story. As a college dropout, he was uncomfortable to work under someone. So he forms a team and manufactures his own products under the name of apple. And the rest of the story tells his rise and fall and revenge.

The movie was not that appreciable but admirable for the character inspired by real life. I felt the movie went to the wrong filmmaker, expected better delivery from the director of 'Swing Vote'. The performances were just okay, especially the imitating walking style of Steve Jobs by Ashton Kutcher looked like a fake. It is unfair to say Ashton Kutcher is the responsible for all the mess. He was awesome in many important scenes of the movie. In the end it is all left up to you. If you see a portrayal of the real life person's tale on screen then you will be stupefy for the great personality. Or if you see it as another movie you will get notice plenty of flaws in the movie and feel something was not right. But in my opinion it a movie one should never miss although it is rated bad. Now I am more eager for the next adaptation 'Steve Jobs, the Poet'.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Jobs review

Posted : 10 years, 5 months ago on 22 November 2013 06:20

The anticipation and curiosity for this film from fans of Apple was equal only to that felt just moments before the presentation of a new product. Talking about the character that has made the history of computing in recent decades is always difficult, because you are likely to forget something or someone upset , that's why first of all you have to admire the courage of the director Joshua Michael Stern struggling with his first real film , however this does not justify having transformed a film from the tremendous potential in a simple for-TV movie .

The scene opens with a young Steve Jobs, masterfully played by Ashton Kutcher , struggling with a university system too far below his expectations within which fails to express his creative genius . This continues his desire for knowledge led him also to make use of hallucinogenic substances together with the partners of the moment and to his friend as a way to find that "something more " . The only course that can stimulate his imagination is that of calligraphy , a discipline that will help him develop a passion for beauty combined usefulness and fine attention to detail graphic and beyond. The University was standing too close and decided to leave because they believed that the springboard for his life . And he was right .

The film delves once in his career information at a glance telling his past initial Atari , where he managed to develop a video game using his friendship with Steve Wozniak , and manages to be hunting for this difference of opinion with the then president. This brief experience led him to stay in close contact with Wozniak and in this period he was fascinated by his friend who is developing , in his spare time , a graphics card capable of communicating with the TV screen .

Thus begins the true story of Apple , where the young Steve Jobs, thanks to its charm and its entrepreneurial skills , is able to transform a small startup founded in a garage in a multinational publicly traded with revenues mind-boggling. At this stage we are witnessing the transformation of the character as a young dreamer to entrepreneur with no time for friends, almost immediately relegated to minor roles and arrogance for the family.

At this stage of the film you feel the lack of precision of the director, relegating to the background the figure of Steve Wozniak, when in fact it has been for years the link between the demands imaginative and creative Jobs and practicality of selling a car perfectly working from the technical point of view . Other aspects that should be explored are definitely better : the trip to India , from which Steve came back changed , the non- paternity against his daughter Lisa , the controversy with Microsoft's Bill Gates in the film relegated to a single phone call and finally the period when, out of the Apple family , he founded NeXT and bought Pixar . Not certain episodes of little consequence. The time film are important, but we felt it was the least strange little attention in the telling of these episodes.

The film ends with a Jobs more mature , thoughtful and capable of distinguishing the real priorities of life, reconnecting with his family and with his beloved creature Apple. Very little was enough to make this film memorable , the premises were there , a perfect replica of Steve Jobs (Ashton Kutcher ) and a good story to tell, unfortunately, the expectations have been disregarded making it just a simple movie , ghost of what could become ...


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A missed opportunity

Posted : 10 years, 8 months ago on 10 September 2013 10:04

"We will never stop innovating..."

By most accounts, Apple founder Steve Jobs was a cruel person; a narcissist who acted callously towards his family, friends and subordinates. However, according to Joshua Michael Stern's Jobs, all of the innovator's undeniable shortcomings are forgivable because he was a saint who simply used severe means in his quest for perfection. Even though this movie was not endorsed by Apple, it plays out like a safe commercial for the tech giant, with the screenplay by Matt Whiteley demonstrating no interest in exploring the psychological or behavioural complexity of its titular character. Jobs feels like a surface-level made-for-television movie, never transforming into anything substantive. It's a serviceable experience, but it lacks the ingenuity, execution, thematic heft and lasting impact of David Fincher's The Social Network, the film that Jobs clearly wants to emulate.


Dropping out of college due to boredom, Steve Jobs (Ashton Kutcher) begins sitting in on design classes on-campus, studying calligraphy which stimulates his imagination. Jobs eventually lands a job at Atari, where he recruits his tech-savvy pal Steve Wozniak (Josh Gad) to assist in developing hardware. Finding that Wozniak has developed a device that could revolutionise home computing, Jobs pairs up with his friend, going into business together and founding Apple Computers, hoping to sell their technology to anyone brave enough to buy it. Getting his big break thanks to investor Mike Markkula (Dermot Mulroney), Jobs develops Apple into an industry force to be reckoned with, developing innovative products to remain ahead of their competition. However, power plays and financial demands force Jobs out of his own company, though he eventually returns years later with a vision to re-energise the fading Apple brand.

Jobs follows the standard biopic template, providing a "greatest hits" compilation of major events in Steve Jobs' life and Apple's tumultuous development. Since Stern and Whiteley strive to cover as much ground as possible, they fail to give any one subplot the dramatic development that it deserves, leading to story threads that lead absolutely nowhere. For instance, Jobs has a very heated phone call with Bill Gates regarding Microsoft and threatens to sue, but nothing more stems from this. Likewise, Jobs throws out his girlfriend due to an unwanted pregnancy, and refuses to accept that the child is his. In the third act, suddenly, the disowned daughter is in Steve's custody without any explanation as to why he finally embraced his little girl. At the very least, however, the film is fairly successful in its early stages, providing an absorbing glimpse at the early development of Apple in the 1970s. A two-hour film could have been produced which zeroed in on the early days alone, but the film wants to chronicle a lot more, resulting in a disjointed mishmash of dramatic skits without a proper through-line. Jobs is ambitious, but it fails to sufficiently delve into who Steve Jobs is and what makes him tick.


One of the fatal flaws of Jobs is that it decides for us that being a technological innovator is a good excuse for being a repellent human. It's the adulation that Stern and Whiteley display towards Jobs that renders the movie infinitely less interesting than it had the potential to be. Whereas The Social Network had the intelligence to present an honest, insightful, morally ambiguous portrayal of its subject matter and let us draw our own conclusions, Jobs is much less sophisticated. Worse, the ending is a total dud; it closes on an empty, underwhelming note, destined to induce murmurs of "Is that it?" Rather than a meaningful conclusion that effectively wraps everything up, the flick just seems to cut itself off right after Jobs gets back the reigns to his company which ultimately leads them to where they are today. A detailed segment about Apple's rise to prominence in the 21st Century would have been interesting, or the film could have even closed with a short, poignant montage depicting Jobs' more recent innovations leading up to his death. If such material was tagged onto the end, movie-goers would leave the cinema with interesting material to ponder. In its current form, you'll just shrug.

If nothing else, Jobs can be admired for its technical credits. Putting the tiny $12 million budget to good use, Stern convincingly recreates the '70s, '80s and '90s, with period-specific costumes and make-up, supplemented with a pleasant soundtrack of recognisable songs. With that said, though, Stern is not much of a visual stylist. Fincher's The Social Network was much more involving, and its pace was brisker, but Jobs is extremely middle-of-the-road all the way through, only rarely gaining much traction. Luckily, the acting all-round is strong for the most part. Kutcher is a fine, if not exactly memorable, Steve Jobs. He even emulates his distinctive walk, a fact that Stern is all too happy to exploit - maybe 10% of the film consists of shots of Kutcher just walking.


Ultimately, the story of Jobs and Apple is wasted in this distilled two-hour motion picture; there is easily enough fodder for a television miniseries that could provide the definitive overview of this subject and incisively explore more than just the surface of this complex man. Watching Jobs is akin to reading a Wikipedia entry due to its lack of depth and detail. For those curious about the life of Steve Jobs or the growth of Apple, the movie may be serviceable enough. By no means is this a terrible movie; it's just a missed opportunity, playing out like a Lifetime Original production as opposed to an audacious theatrical feature.

5.2/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry