Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

A good movie

Posted : 9 years, 2 months ago on 10 March 2015 11:07

It had been a while since I wanted to watch this movie but, to be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect. Indeed, the buzz was definitely mixed on this one as I kept hearing a lot of positive things about this flick but there was also a lot of people who really didnโ€™t like it and it was pretty much a flop when it was released. Anyway, I thought it was actually pretty good. I mean, I have never been a huge fan of Adam Sandler, thatโ€™s for sure, but his character was really interesting, probably the best one he got so far and he definitely delivered a solid performance. In my opinion, he really carried the movie. Next to him, you had also a pretty good Seth Rogen but the guy was pretty much playing his usual witty looser. Eventually, the main problem was probably the running time. I mean, did this story really need to be 150 minutes long? I doubt it and it was above all obvious during the very long bit when they get stuck in Leslie Mann's house for like a hole weekend and the whole sequence lasted about 30 minutes for no good reasons. To conclude, yes, it was flawed but I still think it was quite enjoyable and it is definitely worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Funny People review

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 16 September 2010 05:25

I went to this with Kate while Tyler was in MA. It was a slow moving movie, not an ordinary Adam Sandler...But it still had it's very funny parts.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Funny People

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 7 September 2010 02:35

Let's get something out of the way before I get into discussing anything else: it's not exactly fair to compare FUNNY PEOPLE to either THE 40-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN or KNOCKED UP. While all three films were helmed by the same director, and while they feature a lot of the same actors, you'd really have to be blind not to notice that Judd Apatow is trying a different approach with FUNNY PEOPLE. While the comedy is still very much present, this is more of a dramatic piece, whereas Apatow's two former films were more comedic, with the dramatic elements staying more in the background. I'm issuing this as a warning to those who are expecting FUNNY PEOPLE to make them constantly laugh their asses off with Apatow's signature mixture of sweet and raunchy humor: you'll be rewarded, for the MOST part, but prepare for something a little deeper as well. FUNNY PEOPLE is more my kind of movie than Apatow's prior two cinematic efforts, because it is a character study, and a very good one at that, despite the fact that it stumbles a little bit during its last act. Apatow is aiming for greatness, which he doesn't necessarily achieve here, but in my mind, I think it's best to think of this film as transitional - now that he's done this, there's no doubt that he'll continue refining his craft and moving into deeper thematic waters in future films, and that's very much something to look forward to.

The trailer would lead you to believe that FUNNY PEOPLE is about a comedian who is diagnosed with a terminal disease, eventually discovers he's not dying, and then as a result of this, he starts relishing life a lot more and becomes a better person. Thankfully, that's not what happens here, and thank God that Apatow can resist succumbing to conventionality (as opposed to so many other filmmakers). FUNNY PEOPLE is more grounded in reality than the trailer would have you believe, because actually, even after George Simmons (Adam Sandler) discovers that he's not really sick, he continues making a lot of the same mistakes he made earlier in his life. The best evidence of this is the fact that, during the trailer, there's a point at which we hear George saying "I feel like I'm finally in the moment"... yet those words are never actually said by him during the film. Sure, it's evident that George learns from the whole experience, but he's still the same person, which makes FAR more sense. If George went through a 180-degree transformation during the film, FUNNY PEOPLE would be every bit as blah and unrealistic as the majority of comedies that get tossed in multiplexes nowadays, but it's far from that.

What I've been saying about the film's largely serious undertones may turn off those who are looking to laugh, but rest assured that there are some hilarious moments to be found in FUNNY PEOPLE that make the title epithet feel like an understatement. The average comedy shows you all of its funny moments in the trailer (usually because those are the only funny moments it has), but the opposite happens here, particularly with the scenes involving George's interactions with the "creepy accent" doctor - we see PARTS of this in the trailer, but most of the truly uproarious parts of it are reserved for the actual film. There's an incredibly funny set of scenes involving George's visit with his assistant Ira (Seth Rogen) to a sort of convention of MySpace employees, in which many a truth is spoken in jest about people's obsession with their number of "online friends," and there's a particularly great line involving a comparison between MySpace and Craigslist. However, the film's most solid success in the comedic department comes with the sudden spurt of cameos that we get during a scene in which George goes to a bar after discovering he's no longer sick. I'll try to keep myself from spoiling as much as possible, but it's hard to give props to this particular scene without doing so: there's an uproariously funny moment that intercuts between a conversation between George and rapper Eminem and a conversation between Ira and Ray Romano. Eminem's dead-pan line delivery is brilliant, and when the scene ends with Ira saying "I thought everybody loved you!" I nearly fell off my chair. This intercutting between the two conversations, combined with the way the two are melded to make for an awesome punchline, is perfect further evidence of the already-known fact that Apatow is a master of comedic timing.

As I explained, though, the drama takes precedence in FUNNY PEOPLE, which may or may not disappoint fans of the director's earlier work. The most admirable aspect here is the fact that Apatow generally avoids conventionality in the dramatic elements just as much as he does in the comedic elements. George's "girl who got away" Laura (Leslie Mann) starts sort of re-connecting with him as soon as she finds out he's sick, and once George gets the news that he's not dying, he's apprehensive about saying this to her, as he fears that she'll just go back to being mad at him. Therefore, he asks his assistant Ira to give her the news, and at this point, I was watching with trepidation, fearing that the movie would succumb to the cliche and have the news literally change Laura's mindset completely. Fortunately, Apatow's cinematic world is too grounded in authenticity to let that happen. The event of George thinking he was going to die was simply a way to ease her back to him, so that they could reminisce about their past in some truly wonderful scenes that are strewn with a deep feeling of nostalgia. Unfortunately for George, Laura is married with two kids, so getting back to her won't necessarily be that easy, and that struggle is what essentially comprises the film's final act.

This flaw is more minor than some critics are making it out to be, but yes, FUNNY PEOPLE is a little too long, and the tone is just a wee-bit awkward during the final scenes. There are two moments in particular that feel forced. The first involves the viewing of a video of one of Laura's daughters performing a song from the musical CATS - this scene (in particular, George's demeanor during it) is used in order to have Laura supposedly have a realization, but it simply doesn't feel as genuine as most of the other dramatic moments in the film. The other scene that was handled poorly involves a character arriving at a precise area of an airport at an all-too-specific point in time, and while this is the only contrivance in the film, it still sticks out, and I can't help but feel like Apatow could've found a better way to handle this thread of the plot. I don't have a problem with films being too long as long as they need to be, but FUNNY PEOPLE didn't really need to be as long as it is - the great ideas that it gets across could've been transmitted just as effectively if it had been half an hour shorter. However, these are minor nitpicks that still don't stop everything else from making this a very good film.

Adam Sandler and Leslie Mann are absolutely terrific in FUNNY PEOPLE, and if the Academy were kinder to comedies, these two would at least be in contention. I thought this would be impossible, but I totally FORGOT about the generally stupid and silly characters he's played in so many of the duds he's been in. The ONLY time I was reminded of it was when a particularly amusing line was spoken by a character, and it's a line that establishes a nice parallel between Sandler's character George and the actual actor: "He's really funny. I don't know why his movies aren't." Sandler's work is amazing because he manages to be believable as the uber famous comedian he plays (which one expects wasn't hard to do), but he also manages to be great during George's moments of vulnerability. Not since PUNCH-DRUNK LOVE has he given such an effective performance. One of my (minor) complaints about KNOCKED UP was that Leslie Mann was so good in it that I kind of wished we got even more from her in that movie, and thank God that she has such a meaty role in FUNNY PEOPLE because, like Sandler, she's predictably good in the funny sequences, but she's also terrific in the dramatic moments. She has some tough serious scenes to deal with, and she never hits a false note (one scene in particular during which she cries is absolutely heart-breaking).

The supporting department is solid as well. Many have complained that somehow Seth Rogen's significant weight loss has made him less funny, which I don't really agree with, though (of course) Apatow milks this perception in the film, with two instances of people telling him he's less funny now that he's skinny (when Jonah Hill says "Go lose some more weight, you look weird," I laughed incredibly hard). Jonah Hill is well-cast because, as we know, he's most effective at being funny whenever he plays characters who get easily flustered and start yelling and complaining all over the place. One of the biggest surprises, though, was Jason Schwartzman, whom I've never been too impressed with (he's given largely bland performances in the past), and here, he does a fantastic job as an actor who stars in a crappy sitcom, yet is totally self-indulgent in flaunting his fame - the most brilliant aspect of his performance is the fact that he doesn't become cookie-cutter annoying or a villain of the film per se, and instead, we sense that there are a probably a lot of insecurities under all the boasting.

I said at the start of this review that it wasn't fair to compare this to Apatow's prior efforts, but if it's necessary to do it, then I'll say that KNOCKED UP has been the best he's directed so far because aside from being his most effective combination of sweet and raunchy humor, it also had a lot of deep, intelligent insight on relationships. But FUNNY PEOPLE is still wonderful, and I feel that it's really great that Apatow is moving towards more profound fare, and even though he's doing that, I don't believe he'll ever lose his expert handle on comedy. While the film drags unnecessarily during its final reels, what comes before that is more than enough to make up for it, as it is a delightfully well-crafted blend of gut-bustingly funny and emotionally affecting scenes.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Funny People review

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 2 September 2010 11:39

funny people - where......who........this was crap - sorry sandler fans - but honestly I could have written a better movie myself.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Funny People review

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2010 05:16

Let's take out the "Funny" in the title and just call it "People". Because, honestly, I didn't find it all that funny. First problem with the movie: The Length. Did they have to take two and a half hours to tell us the story of this comedian with relationship problems? Second problem: Waiting half the movie to find out something we already knew. About halfway through the movie we find out that he is not going to die. Even though, anyone who watched the trailer would already know that. Third problem: Leslie Mann. She just really pissed me off in this movie. So overall I thought this movie was too long and the funniest scenes were the parts when the actors were doing stand-up.My suggestion: If you want to spend two and a half hours on a movie, watch "The Departed". 4.7


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Funny People review

Posted : 14 years ago on 3 May 2010 04:45

This film doesn't feel long but it isn't absorbing either. Apatow reunites a good cast, a good staff, a honest story and is obvious that this movie is special for him but something just doesn't work, the world of this movie seems real but no alive.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

letdownnn

Posted : 14 years, 5 months ago on 26 November 2009 02:45

Funny people.. had funny people.. but wasn't funny..


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Unfunny Movie

Posted : 14 years, 7 months ago on 8 October 2009 01:33

"You're not funny. You look funny, but you're not funny." [I could say the same thing to the movie]


The drama-comedy Funny People is Judd Apatow's third outing as a writer-director, and it stars both Seth Rogen and Adam Sandler. This should be a funny movie, right? Of course, the problem with expectations is they occasionally lead to disappointment - and Funny People is disappointing on numerous levels. It has been suggested that this flick is the final entry in Judd Apatow's comic trilogy about sex (2005's The 40-Year-Old Virgin), birth (2007's Knocked Up) and now death (or at least the threat of death). In this regard, the movie is a blatant attempt on Apatow's part to display maturity as a filmmaker, and the product is more of a drama (an uncomfortable one at that) than a comedy. There's one crucial hindrance with Funny People: it's neither funny nor touching - it's grim. Even Apatow and Sandler devotees will find their attention spans challenged, as the film wears out its welcome long before the excessive 150-minute runtime has elapsed.


Central to the story is a comedian named George Simmons (Sandler). After spending his career making asinine comedy movies for the masses, George has become self-absorbed and emotionally stunted. Towards the beginning of the movie, he's diagnosed with a rare blood disease. Upon learning about his impending doom, George basically just continues to indulge in his usual self-centred activities (except with a much darker attitude) rather than embarking on some form of spiritual journey or attempting to right his past wrongs. George eventually stumbles upon a makeshift comedic soul mate in the form of struggling stand-up Ira Wright (Rogen); taking the inexperienced funny man into his life for jokes and companionship.


This is, however, just one half of the narrative. George pursuing his estranged early love Laura (Mann) constitutes the other half. The notion seems to be that Funny People is a two-hander between George and Ira, but George's story eventually overwhelms Ira's. By combining what should have remained two separate stories into one movie of extreme length, a lot of potential is wasted. The relationship between Ira and George was a self-contained narrative in itself, and the first half which explores this is quite entertaining. But instead of concentrating on this narrative thread, the film pursues something more hackneyed, with George trying to reconnect with Laura while Ida is held in reserve. Exploring the deep rituals of the comedy circuit would've also made the film far more compelling.


Judd Apatow's movies (even those he produces) are frequently crippled by their needlessly long runtimes and general self-indulgence. Funny People is no different - it meanders around a number of plotlines before seemingly ending at random; aware it has exhausted its audiences' tolerance for Apatow's trademark excess. Believe it or not, the running time of Funny People exceeds the extended editions of both The 40-Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up by around 10 minutes, and there's more that could have been added. Some connective tissue appears absent (like the explanation of why Laura, who is irritated and dismissive during earlier conversations with George, agrees to see him upon learning he's dying - and it's a mystery as to how she even finds out about his condition since there's no public announcement). Much like the films of Quentin Tarantino, Funny People is a movie in desperate need of discipline.


Disappointment is imminent on the comedy front. The stand-up sequences, with their poor lighting and an air of flop-sweat, admittedly possess an air of authenticity (the actors themselves even wrote their own material, and it was all filmed in front of a live crowd). But the on-stage routines aren't funny or in the least bit memorable. In fact, some of them are excruciatingly unfunny. Pretty much the only funny parts of the entire movie were shown in the trailers (maybe 5 or 6 lines in a 2ยฝ-hour movie), none of which are genuinely hysterical. Unfortunately, too, the dialogue never crackles with any wit. Funny People is an audacious movie that provides a few entertaining moments, but as a whole it's tragically flat.


Adam Sandler as George Simmons is a stroke of genius. The actor is in top form with this low-key performance, and this is perhaps the most lived-in work of his career. Sandler has already proved he's a capable dramatic actor (Punch-Drunk Love, Reign Over Me), and he flexes these chops capably here. Suitably, the character of George Simmons is a famous comedian who has long sacrificed his edge for awful movies made purely for money. With Sandler having starred in a number of awful movies made purely for the box office returns over recent years, it's clear he's having a little fun at the expense of his own career.


As with every Apatow movie, the cast gives the film a class-reunion sensibility, which makes the film a lot more fun for them than it is for an audience. As Ira Wright, a slimmed down Seth Rogen is in familiar territory; playing a poorly-masked version of his usual self. Leslie Mann (Apatow's wife) is also in familiar territory playing Laura, though she's still endearing. As Clarke, Laura's Australian husband, Eric Bana steals the show. Meanwhile the two offspring of Mann and Apatow play the children of Laura and Clarke, and Jason Schwartzman and the agonisingly unfunny Jonah Hill play Ira's wisecracking friends/roommates (a staple ingredient in Apatow films). A bunch of real celebrities (playing themselves) are given small cameos too, and they're fun to watch (Ray Romano's cameo is one of the film's most amusing moments).


In the case of Funny People, there's simply too much here for one movie. The plotting is unruly and flabby, as what seems to be a straightforward tale of morality and redemption becomes bogged down by unnecessary characters, formula and outright schmaltz. This isn't an inherently uninteresting or gruelling film (in fact the first hour is great), but the indefensible length turns a bold experiment into something that too often feels like an endurance contest.

4.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Instant Classic

Posted : 14 years, 9 months ago on 3 August 2009 09:27

Pure genius in this film. I've always been a huge fan of Sandler (you can see from my shirt in my profile) and this could possibly be his best work yet. He is very well supported by this very funny cast and many cameos. With Apatow directing, I guess I shouldn't be surprised by its wonderfulness. I never knew if I wanted to cry or laugh through the entire thing, which is good. The only complaints I heard was from its length, but I feel it truly needed to be that length and it wasn't a minute too long, I wanted more still!

Go see it!


0 comments, Reply to this entry