Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse review

Posted : 2 years, 2 months ago on 2 March 2022 02:20

I don't hate the Twilight movies as much as others do, but I don't care for them either. The first was average, the second was pretty poor and the worst so far and while Eclipse is the best yet that isn't saying much. I haven't read the books the movies are based on, apart from a couple of pages of one which didn't spark my interest in reading the rest, but my sister has and likes the books and movies, though she says she likes the books more.

Eclipse does look good. I think the scenery in general is splendid and the cinematography and editing is much better too. The special effects are also an improvement, they don't feel as rushed here. The score is also very nice, courtesy of Howard Shore it is probably the best score in any of the Twilight movies. David Slade also does an above serviceable job directing, Eclipse is by far the best directed movie of the Twilight saga as of now.

However, Eclipse still has the same major problems as the first two did, but not quite as bad. The dialogue is still very clunky, Pattinson and his family have some pretty good lines but Stewart and Lautner's dialogue are quite awkward and in general the delivery is too. The story is more involving than in New Moon, which was not only sluggish but almost a non-event in terms of story, but there is the odd disjointed part particularly in the middle act and in the more "romantic" bits. Stewart and Pattinson have a decent chemistry, but Stewart still looks awkward with Lautner, while the action scenes felt rushed and the pace is still incredibly sluggish especially in the middle.

The acting is very mixed. Pattinson and his family I was fine with this time around, and Bryce Dallas Howard is a welcome addition to the cast as Victoria. Billy Burke while somewhat underused is decent as Charlie as well. Conversely, there are some weak links too. Taylor Lautner does little more than take his shirt off and say some clunky lines, while Kristen Stewart while better than she was in New Moon with a marginally more expressive face gives a rather lacklustre performance as Bella as she does have a whiny delivery here and there are still the awkward pauses between each line.

So overall, it has its strengths but also its weaknesses, but it is watchable and while it could have been a lot better with better scripting and pacing Eclipse is the best so far of the saga. 5/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse review

Posted : 8 years, 1 month ago on 23 March 2016 08:05

I might offend some people, but I will be honest. This movie is pathetic. I feel sorry for folks, saying this is their favorite story or movie. Brainless teen love triangle. I guess this is a winner recipe in these times...


1 comments, Reply to this entry

There's still no reason to care about this series

Posted : 13 years, 1 month ago on 25 March 2011 11:42

"This wasn't a choice between you and Jacob. It was a choice between who I am and who I should be."


In Eclipse, an antagonistic vampire with a grudge against another vampire amasses an army of psychotic vampires to attack the good guys. Meanwhile, a bunch of werewolves team up with the good vampires to fight the evil ones, leading to a total all-out monster-on-monster war. So, why does Eclipse suck? Well, because it's a Twilight movie - the vampires are whiny, angsty, emo-ish brats, the werewolves are bland, buff pretty boys, the romantic leads share no chemistry, and by law it is forbidden for anything interesting to happen. After all, if the stories contained anything interesting, it would stand in the way of what the Twilight franchise is truly about: convincing young girls that true happiness can only be attained through co-dependent submission to emotionally domineering douchebags in the context of traditional marriage. If one eliminates all of the hokey mythology surrounding the vampires and werewolves of author Stephenie Meyer's world, all that's left is an ongoing, angst-ridden hormonal explosion.



With her senior year at high school drawing to an end, Bella Swan (Stewart) is standing on the precipice of all that is to become in the next phase of her life. While still longing to become a vampire in order to be with boyfriend Edward Cullen (Pattinson) for eternity, Bella is nonetheless torn by the dissenting opinions of others. Not to mention, werewolf Jacob Black (Lautner) still clings to the hope that Bella will dump Edward for him. You see, Bella may think she knows what she wants, but the boyfolk assure her that she doesn't really. The lads know exactly what's best for her, and will decide her future for her! Meanwhile, revenge-seeking vampire Victoria (Howard) begins creating an army of powerful newborn vampires. With Bella in imminent danger, the Cullen family and Jacob's (shirtless) wolf-pack put aside their feuds in order to protect Bella (despite her manipulative, whorish tendencies).


There is enough compelling dramatic material in the Twilight concept for only one or maybe two feature-length movies, but no more. Yet, by the time the credits roll on the second Breaking Dawn film in 2012, Bella Swan's existential crisis will have exceeded the 10-hour cinematic mark. I mean what the fuck? Not even Indiana Jones or Toy Story could be sustained for that long, and Twilight is definitely no Indiana Jones or Toy Story. Three films into the Twilight series, and the appeal of this agonising saga remains baffling. The stories are uninteresting, the characters are flat and dull, the mythology is dreary, and the romantic themes are centuries outdated. And this just applies to the books - the films are even worse due to the fact that, while it took only Meyer to write a bad book, Eclipse is the product of hundreds of hours of hard labour on the part of actors, writers, directors, producers, editors, etc. However, at the very least, there are a few self-referential jokes that provoke chortles, including a scene in which Edward asks if Jacob owns a shirt. 99% of the laughs remain unintentional, though.



Weird as it may sound, the Twilight films are progressively getting worse. The more money spent on them, the shittier they are. 2008's Twilight was bad, but at least had some charm. 2009's New Moon, on the other hand, was a turgid disaster which sputtered out with a tragic non-climax. The decline in quality continues here with Eclipse; a tedious slog that's only fit for the most devoted Twilight fanatics. Dreary, stupid, tragically drawn-out and loaded with tedious dialogue, Eclipse utterly squanders the potentially badass premise of a vampire army fighting werewolves and other vampires. Instead of a film with fertile conflict and legitimate swoon, Eclipse books the bullet train to Dullsville. Once again, the adapted screenplay by Melissa Rosenberg is faithful to the source material to a fault. If Rosenberg were a good writer, she would have reworked the endless scenes of shallow idiots talking into scenes of semi-developed idiots with something worthwhile to say.


Aside from the warring battle, Eclipse is mostly concerned with rehashing the events of New Moon - i.e. the love triangle between Bella, Jacob and Edward. At the end of New Moon, Bella chose Edward, so the story should be over. But Twilight is a woman's fantasy, and Meyer felt that a lot more could be milked from the dreamy notion of a girl being fought over by two young studs. The problem is that Twilight is an undernourished romantic fantasy with little realistic behaviour that spotlights a bunch of completely shallow characters. For crying out loud, Jacob continually tries to forcefully convince Bella that she loves him. Later, Jacob learns that Bella is marrying Edward and refuses to help in the forthcoming battle, meaning he only initially agreed to take part in said battle in a sleazy attempt to impress Bella and win her over. After his tantrum, Bella the evil whore tells Jacob to kiss her. Are you fucking serious?! Edward, meanwhile, is the type of overprotective, jealous boyfriend that girls hate (consider that he sabotaged Bella's truck to prevent her from seeing Jacob). Yet girls still love this douchebag? Thus, the Twilight series is all about a girl's choice between an overprotective, unreasonable, angsty brat, and a clingy, forceful asshole who can't take no for an answer. Bella would be better off marrying her father, for fuck's sake. By the hour mark of Eclipse, one's eyelids become infinitely more interesting.



Honestly, it's still beyond this reviewer's mental parameters as to why Jacob and Edward make a huge fuss over such a dead-eyed, dithering bore of a girl. The film provides no compelling reason as to why these lads put so much on the line for a female who can barely wait to get out of her boyfriend's line of sight so she can cuddle with another guy! Bella may be attractive, but, let's face it, that's all she has going for her. Shouldn't love be based on something deeper? I mean, given the chance I'd probably sleep with Bella a few times, but I prefer not to have relationships with flat wooden tables.


David Slade was the director who took the helm of Eclipse. Slade previously directed the amazing Hard Candy and the visually stylish 30 Days of Night. A genuinely skilled horror director, it made sense for him to tackle a Twilight film. Slade, however, failed to do anything worthwhile with Meyer's insufferable abstinence lecture. What should have been an enthralling, heroic film of affection and protection has instead been reduced to a dialogue-heavy slog which retraces several plot points of its predecessors whilst making barely any headway of its own. Slade had his trusty stylish urges and the most action-intensive Twilight script at his disposal, but the creative effort is indistinguishable - the director was clearly in studio employee mode here; making no effort to shake the actors from their melodramatic comas or to prevent the action from being nothing but a crunching blur of suspect special effects. There are a few entertaining moments here and there, but not enough to salvage this malarkey. The vampires turn to marble or something when they're killed and the film is rated PG-13, denying Slade the chance to orchestrate some gory mayhem.



Do the Twilight producers actually advertise for bad actors? Inexplicably, the returning cast members are actually getting worse with each new movie. Kristen Stewart's interpretation of Bella continues to be mopey and completely uninteresting - it seems as if she took a sleeping pill before filming and was perpetually fighting to stay awake. Robert Pattinson, meanwhile, submitted an all-time worst performance here as Edward. Reprising his role of Jacob is Taylor Lautner, who's embarrassing for the most part. Lautner was somewhat decent in New Moon, but he's full-on awful here. The young star merely acted the shit out of every scene, filling every line reading with pulsating, hammy, unearned intensity that's more amusing than effective. Naturally, Lautner preferred to spend most of his time sans shirt to proudly show off his physique.


Despite the filmmaking talent behind Twilight Eclipse (Twishite Ecrapse?), the movie is a dull mess. Instead of finding an artful tone, director Slade merely filled the movie with a plethora of random pop tunes to provide atmosphere while working through a tedious story routine of swoon and quarrel. Plus, is anyone else disturbed by the messages that Twilight preaches to its target audience? It just tells young girls that virginity is important, and that you should marry as early as possible. Fucking hell, it is a blueprint for creating an entire generation of shy, demurring, deferential domestic abuse victims waiting to happen. Fans of Twilight will doubtlessly enjoy Eclipse, but this third go-round will not make Twihard converts of the rest of us. Three movies and more than six hours in, and there's still no reason to care about this godforsaken franchise.

1.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 24 November 2010 08:31

To be honest, even though it might sound surprising, I thought that ‘Twilight’ was actually not bad at all. I mean, sure, obviously, it was no masterpiece, but I thought that the concept had some potential and it was in fact a decent watch, especially because I had such low expectations. However, eventually, the first sequel ‘New Moon’ turned out to be a huge disappointment and this following sequel gave me basically the same feeling. The main issue is that, instead of developing the relationship between this vampire and this average girl, the whole thing simply goes nowhere and I was just bored during the whole duration. To give Taylor Lautner’s character here a more important role was also a huge mistake and, as a result, Bella would be stuck this whole franchise in this tedious ‘threesome’. Seriously, during the whole thing, you have them arguing about what guy she should be with which was just so boring. Concerning David Slade, a once really promising director following the interesting ‘Hard Candy’ and ‘30 Days of Night’, this movie would a huge step-back in his career  as he hasn’t directed another full length feature ever since which is jut rather sad. Anyway, to conclude, I cannot possibly recommend this movie, expect if you are die hard 'Twilight' fan.

By the way, you should check Roger Ebert review on this movie. It's hilarious !
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100628/REVIEWS/100629977



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Mindless, Cheesy, Predictable, Worst one yet.

Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 16 September 2010 04:37

After a series of random killings plague Seattle, the Cullen fears that they will venture into Forks and disturb the peace. Once they realize however that is the work of Victoria they scramble to help protect Bella, but they must align with the wolves in order to take on her army of new born blood thirsty vampires. With the battle rapidly approaching Bella is confronted with the choice between Edward and Jacob, and who she loves more.

Twilight as a series of books have swept over most of the teenage girl population 15 and under. They believe Edward and Jacob are the hottest of the hot, the epitome of all things literary characters. Twilight is not a great series of books. It is overdramtic, why to focused on one character and the same old story over and over. How long does it take Bella to realize who she is in love with? Does her heart not belong to sparkly frizzy haired vampire Edward Cullen? Why does the love story still play an issue in the third novel? The idea of love in the Twi-universe is a nonsense notion. Bella who apparently has devoted her heart and soul to being a vampire is willing to ask Jacob to make out with her before he enters the biggest battle of his life. Only then does she try to explain to her boyfriend Edward that she didn’t know what became of her and she does love Jacob but just not as much as she loves her precious Edward. Wow is that even love? It seems way more like lust to me. Bella loves Edward because he is different, not because of who he is. He is a 108 year old vampire who still hasn’t been able to adapt to society over the years. He continues to go to highschool, and this brings up another point, did they not graduate in the first movie? Did Bella and Edward not attend prom together because they were both seniors? I thought so anyway, correct me if I am wrong.

Stephanie Meyer is not a good writer in any way. Her characters are bland, say really cheesy dumb things to each other and fight over the one girl that is probably not worth fighting for. Twilight is widely known to be a fantasy where Bella represents Meyer herself and two buff guys fight for her. Bella is in many ways the character version of herself. There is a description comparison that can easily be found on the web and there features are strikingly similar in many ways.

There is also one more thing I need to mention, and no disrespect to any of her fans but Bryce Dallas Howard lost a lot of my respect. She was offered the role of Victoria before filming of Twilight even began, she turned it down because she did not feel strongly about the series as a whole. The role was eventually given to Rachelle Lefevre and she did a decent job with the part. As the series took off and Victoria played an bigger part Dallas Howard took notice and wanted the part back. The respectable thing to do at this point from any film exec would be to respectfully decline her no found interest and stick with your original actress. Dallas Howard was awarded the part she originally turned down and in my opinion she failed miserable as Victoria. She added nothing to the overall outcome because in the end remember nothing matters except what Bella wants or need. No other character even remotely matters except for Edward, Jake and Bella.The Cullens even are a waste of time trying to make them interesting, because lets face teenage girls don’t care about Jasper or Emmitt they want Edward and Jacob to run around shirtless. The Cullen flashbacks were easily the best and most rewarding scenes in the movie, yet they were lost amongst Lautners lack of shirt wearing and Edwards complete devotion to Bella.

There is a lot to dislike about this movie and little to like. They make these films as stereotypically as possible it seems. They add the cheesy dialogue and the shirtless Jacob for teenage girls to like and fall dreamily in love with. Twilight offers nothing to the mature film goer, and nothing to anyone who likes interesting and well thought out plots. Twilight is just an over zealous teenage angst film, with action scenes that are predictable and always favour the Cullen clan and the wolves. Word to the wise Smeyer people get more attached to action scenes that have a good balance of good and bad sides winning. The good do not always win without any hesitation especially after you take the time to explain how dangerous your group of bad guys are.

All though one shout-out before I end this, and that is to Jackson Rathbone who plays Jasper. They finally gave him something interesting to say, and I watched this guy in something else and he proved to me he can really seriously act. So Mr. Rathbone, I am waiting to see your post twi-light decisions because you are the one actor attached to this franchise that could have a bright future.

Eclipse just furthers what the first two already showed me, that Twilight does not care about its mature audience, they care about the shirtless guys they can show the teenage girls, and Bella is just one whiny undecided confused individual. Make up your mind already, because I am already dreading the idea of a two-part possibly 4 hour adaptation of Breaking Dawn which will most likely be a watered down oversexed version of the book which features graphic scenes. Good luck with that adaptation and ruining the book just so the 13 year old female audience is able to buy a ticket.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse

Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 11 September 2010 03:08

The fact that all these rumors about the third film in the TWILIGHT franchise being the best yet in the series are actually true may surprise several people, but it doesn't surprise me a huge deal, mainly because of the fact that David Slade came on board to direct this one. Slade was responsible for the searingly incredible HARD CANDY and for the surprisingly good, also vampire-themed 30 DAYS OF NIGHT. Hokey as the first two movies may have been, I had all the expectations in the world that Slade would do something good with ECLIPSE, and indeed, he does. This film improves upon the first two outings by upping the level of excitement from the action sequences and by doing a better job at depicting the things that are at stake emotionally with the story's three main characters. To make it even better (and this is really the factor that makes this film clearly distinguishable from the first two), the film knows when to make fun of itself. The first two films provided their share of unintended guffaws during some ridiculous, over-serious moments. Slade recognizes that there's a considerable amount of silliness to this whole thing and allows that to be exploited for humor that actually IS intentional (the best example of this is Edward's already famous line in regard to Jacob not wearing a shirt).

The love triangle takes center stage in the plot of ECLIPSE. There are many who disagree with what I'm about to say, but well, I said it in my review of NEW MOON, and I'll say it here again because it continues being true: this love triangle is handled better than love triangles we see in most films. Why? Because it's grounded in an emotional reality that was relatively evident in NEW MOON, and is even clearer in ECLIPSE: as much as we may call it a "love triangle," Bella's choice is TOTALLY obvious. A more contrived, hokey plot would have Bella (Kristen Stewart) wander indecisively from one guy to the other, and it would have Edward (Robert Pattinson) and Jacob (Taylor Lautner) constantly growling at each other, and threatening/insulting each other. The movie doesn't choose to focus on the cheap question of "Who will she choose?" It TELLS us that she is in love with Edward, but that she's conflicted about certain warm feelings that she also has for Jacob. That makes a lot more sense, and is a lot more relatable to a real-life emotional conflict (well, you know, minus the vampire/werewolf aspect). If this doesn't become obvious to the audience during the first hour of ECLIPSE, it'll become clear once the lines "I love you more" and "I know" are spoken.

The other reason why there's a sense of unconventionality when it comes to the so-called love triangle here is that Edward and Jacob are able to come together for purposes of protecting Bella, and there's a particularly well-executed scene in a tent in which they converse while Bella is sleeping. It is in this scene that we know for sure that Edward and Jacob aren't mere wooden pawns for Bella to pick one and discard the other. Each of them understands and accepts how important the other guy is to her.

One of the other great strengths that I mentioned the movie has is its much better handle on humor than the first two films. Billy Burke gets some great one-liners in as Bella's father (particularly during the uncomfortable conversation in which Bella has to reveal to him that she's still a virgin). Bella and Jacob's first kiss is followed by an unpredictable and frankly hilarious, um, "punchline." But if I have to pick the one moment in which it's most obvious that this franchise has finally learned to make fun of itself (rather than succumb to unintentional ridiculousness), it's when the line "You know I'm hotter than you" is uttered... just wait till you see the context in which it is said.

The other surprise to be found here is the fact that the embarrassing special effects don't quite plague this film as much as they did the first two. The battle sequences are more exciting, and the final showdown between Edward and the evil Victoria is very satisfying. Sadly, though, I do take issue with the switch from Rachel Lefevre to Bryce Dallas Howard to play the villain; the former actress was a lot more menacing-looking. One of the aspects that has been constantly weak in these films and that continues to be weak here is that the villains aren't developed well. The film is too interested in the romantic plot, which is fine, but it hardly leaves any room to get us to hate the evildoers. Thus, in ECLIPSE, we just have to accept that there's a new "army" of evil vampires who are coming to kill Bella, even if we hardly get any well-developed scenes that set this up.

Another flaw to be found in ECLIPSE emerges during its last few minutes. The denouement of the first TWILIGHT movie (mediocre as that film was) did a good job at setting up Bella's dilemma of whether to change herself into a vampire or stay human. Similarly, the final moments of NEW MOON created a great hook that left everyone waiting for the next installment. Unfortunately, if it weren't for the fact that it's practically common knowledge that there's a fourth chapter in the franchise, some may assume that ECLIPSE was the last film. This film's last scene could easily appear to be definitively conclusive. There isn't much to tell us what stakes are going to be on the line in the next chapter.

Performance-wise, Kristen Stewart continues to be the strongest link. Those who are scoffing as they read this are probably among those who give Stewart a truly unnecessarily hard time by bashing her on message boards. I understand where the bashing comes from: most of the TWILIGHT fans are teenaged girls who wish they could be Bella so that they could make out with the two male characters, so they're jealous that Stewart actually DOES get to be Bella. Boohoo. But the truth is that Stewart has been a consistently great young actress, and I continue to think that she'll have great projects coming her way once life after TWILIGHT begins. I'm glad to say that Slade gets a SLIGHTLY better performance out of Robert Pattinson than the first two directors did... but I'd like to stress the word "slightly" and if you read my reviews of the first two films, you'll see how little that really means (read: he's still kinda bad). Taylor Lautner has a better handle on line delivery and comedic timing, and if it were up to me, Bella would choose Jacob, just so that she can be with the character who is played more genuinely, but I know there's a slew of people who disagree.

The first TWILIGHT film was utterly mediocre. Contrary to how most people felt, I actually liked NEW MOON more because I found it more entertaining at the time, but after some reflection, I think I've realized that it may simply have to do with the fact that Pattinson wasn't in that film as much. However, there's no doubt about the fact that David Slade has given us a marked improvement in this third installment. The story is more cohesive and interesting, and none of its humor is misplaced. Since I'm not a fan of the ending, though, I'm not sure where to place my expectations for BREAKING DAWN, which will be split into two movies. While I have faith in Bill Condon, I have to admit that I'll lower my expectations considerably if (as I fear) the movies aren't rated R. If we have another case (a la THE LOVELY BONES) of sanitizing things to achieve a PG-13 rating, there's probably little hope for the final two movies to be anything more than so-so, but we'll see.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Basically, New Moon: Part II

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 July 2010 03:48

Now, where do I start in this scathing review? First of all, I only wanted to watch this film to see if it was going to be equally as shit as New Moon even though I was expecting it to be. I didn't even watch the whole film (watched 85 minutes of it) and it was pretty much the same as New Moon! I mean, come on! The whole series has gone out of tone and lost what its trying to create but instead, the target audience get turned on by the actors in the film.


Kristen Stewart is an actress who starred in good films before the Twilight films and now she is an actress who is best known for such pathetic and corny films! I began to strongly dislike Bella in this one because she was like a slut who wanted both Jacob and Edward! I mean, Bella showed us again that nobody cares how she feels about the love triangle and the situation she's in let along what Jacob and Edward feel about it! Robert Pattinson as Edward was once again absolutely DREADFUL! I mean, I began to laugh at his awful acting in the opening scene of the film! The scene where Jacob and Edward confront each other while Bella is there is like the most idiotic, wasteful and cheesy confrontations and arguments I think I have ever seen. Despite, Robert Pattinson DID get a Razzie nomination for New Moon, I bloody hope he wins it this time because it would just be AMAZING if he did as well the film winning Worst Picture! Now, Taylor Lautner is as bad as Robert Pattinson and Edward! For one thing: he absolutely blinds the women who watch the films with his so-called 'six-pack' and his 'hot body' and they get turned on by the actor rather than the character. I mean, since when does a character or even an actor EVER turn on its target audience unless in a sex scene?! All these women screaming in films: 'Phwoar! He's fit!' or 'Mmmmm... I would' which I have heard before and it's a pain in the fucking arse! Not so much Stewart but Pattinson and Taylor, you just need to end your acting career like right now because it's not going to get any better!


To be honest, I did find the director selection quite good seeing as Slade has directed films of pure horror, terror and violence! Due to this, I wanted him to make it a more terrifying film rather than a stupidly soppy film like the previous ones but unfortunately, that didn't work. And now another annoying thing: they're being copycats towards Harry Potter by one book being split into two films so now I just can't wait for them to end! I mean, the series could've been really awesome but unfortunately its the actors and their fake bodies that have made the series a so-called 'success'.


Overall, all though Eclipse wasn't as painful as New Moon, it is still a very corny, laughably bad, stupid, pathetic, needlessly and unnecessarily overhyped film that will turn on more women! Go back and graduate at acting school, Rob and Taylor because you clearly didn't before these films!


0 comments, Reply to this entry