Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Blue Velvet review

Posted : 2 years, 1 month ago on 19 March 2022 12:59

David Lynch is a very love-him-hate-him director, with people fascinated by his style and imagery and others who find his films not easy to follow and too weird for their tastes. As somebody who loves Lynch and a lot of his films(the only one I've disliked is Dune), Blue Velvet is up there at the top. The Elephant Man(never has there been a film that moved me more) may be my personal favourite but Blue Velvet is quite possibly Lynch's masterpiece. Loved Mulholland Drive as well, but it is not as accessible as Elephant Man or Blue Velvet- films that even those who aren't fans of Lynch are likely to love- and is his most polarising most likely.

Blue Velvet is an incredible-looking film. All of Lynch's films are beautifully shot and that is true of Blue Velvet as well, and the imagery is both hauntingly surreal and beautiful, all the different colours really popping out at you. The music is hypnotic with a very haunting undercurrent and really adds to the story's strangeness and mystery elements. The script is thoughtful and cohesive with a dose of weird but subtle humour as well as some deliberately not so subtle parts(especially with villain Frank Booth). The atmosphere created is the very meaning of scintillating and suspense levels are to the maximum. The story- one of the most coherent and accessible of any Lynch film- is always interesting and entertaining, the detective story elements are genuinely suspenseful and at times scary, Lynch has never directed a tenser scene than the climax here.

Lynch's direction is superb; along with Mulholland Drive it contains some of his best. The characters all serve a point to the story and they are very interestingly written, in the case of Frank Booth, one of the most evil and fascinating villains on films, iconic. The acting is superb as well, especially with Dennis Hopper who's terrifyingly sadistic and sometimes hilarious, he is very over the top but in a gleefully enjoyable way. Kyle MacLachlan has never been in a better film or given a better performance than here, he's certainly not had a character as interesting either, Laura Dern is great and sensual Isabella Rossellini has a challenging role that she plays to truly devastating effect. Look out for an oddball but memorable appearance from Dean Stockwell as well. Overall, a strange but utterly mesmerising masterpiece. 10/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Blue Velvet review

Posted : 11 years ago on 15 April 2013 10:41

I personally don't like this movie. I think it's terribly overrated. My concept of a terrifying character is really different from the Frank Booth played by Hopper. Frank Booth is the stereotypical villain : disturbed, gives evil laughters, likes to mock at people. A cliché. Kyle MacLachlan doesn't convince me either with his Jeffrey Beaumont. It could have been a much better movie, but it ended up as one of those poor thrillers we see in HBO. Sorry , I won't pretend I like it only because it's by David Lynch.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Blue Velvet review

Posted : 11 years, 8 months ago on 5 August 2012 04:47

"VITTU MIKÄ LEFFA! En yhtään ihmettelisi jos menisi top-5 joukkoon niistä leffoista joita olen ikinä katsonut. Kaikki pelaa mestarillisesti. Musiikki, kuvaus ja näyttely sulautuvat sujuvasti yhteen, lisänä vielä aivan saatanan ahdistava tunnelma ja likainen olo katsomisen jälkeen. Rewatch jossain vaiheessa lähes pakollinen."


0 comments, Reply to this entry

"What a disappointment."

Posted : 12 years ago on 4 April 2012 03:22


I expected so much from this film only to realize how much it falls flat to my expectations. I was expecting more mind fuck, more puzzles, more surprises and more than above average quality but all that I found was something much more or less mediocre. The story was already cliché and so was the characterization. I got the idea he was going into this dark and spiteful decadent kitschy feel but all in all it just wasn’t enough to birth into that dark and spiteful decadent kitschy feel it aspired to be. It was just not that convincing enough for me. I have only seen a few of his films so far and that perhaps have contributed to my lack of understanding and perspective. Perhaps one day, I’ll learn to appreciate the understated “brilliance” this film claims to be but for now, I just don’t and that’s all I can say.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years ago on 4 April 2012 07:19

Since I saw this classic about 20 years ago, I guess it was time for a re-watch. First of all, I have to admit that I have a somewhat difficult relationship with David Lynch. I mean, by now, I have seen all his movies and even though I admire his work and consider him a genuine artist, I usually have a hard time to enjoy most of his features and this movie was a perfect example. Indeed, as usual with Lynch, the beginning was a spellbinding and thrilling film noir which would have made Hitchcock proud. But then, again as usual with this director, he obviously didn't care about the plot, he seamelessly threw it out the window and what remained was a succession of weird and unsettling scenes. In my opinion, it is a pattern used too often by David Lynch and I always find it eventually more frustrating than rewarding. Still, the directing was really neat and there was a fine cast involved (Isabella Rossellini, Kyle MacLachlan, Dennis Hopper, Laura Dern, Dean Stockwell, Brad Dourif, Jack Nance) above all Dennis Hopper was really impressive and probably gave here his best performance ever. Anyway, to conclude, it is an acquired taste but there are still plenty things to love here and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in David Lynch's work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Indisputable masterpiece

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 20 December 2010 12:17

"See that clock on the wall? In five minutes you are not going to believe what I've told you."


For David Lynch, 1986's Blue Velvet was the motion picture which cemented his moviemaking credentials in a way that his prior efforts were unable to achieve. Such is the reputation of Lynch in the 21st Century that it's easy to forget that back in 1986 he was only predominantly recognised for his directorial efforts on The Elephant Man. Aside from the low-budget '80s cult favourite Eraserhead, Lynch had not yet found an outlet in which he could exercise his unique talent for darkly comic drama and visual poetry. Blue Velvet changed this, and consequently Lynch was never again a gun for hire on a movie which was not written or conceived by him. When cinema pundits refer to something as "Lynchian", they are typically referencing the stylistic approach and themes which are on full display in Blue Velvet. A thematically rich, disturbing, enthralling tour de force, the film peels back the curtains of picturesque American suburbia to shed light on the seedy underside which is rarely seen. In this way, it's the cinematic cousin of Sam Mendes' American Beauty.



In the sleepy, picturesque town of Lumberton, USA, young Jeffrey Beaumont (MacLachlan) is utterly bored with his life. After Jeffrey's father is hospitalised upon suffering a heart attack, Jeffrey has no choice but to help with the family business. While wandering through the fields near his home one afternoon, Jeffrey unexpectedly discovers a severed human ear. He takes it to the local police station where Detective Williams (Dickerson) opens an investigation. When he's bluntly told by Williams to forget his discovery, Jeffrey's curiosity is piqued and he becomes determined to solve the mystery himself with some assistance from Williams' daughter Sandy (Dern). Before long, a dark, seedy and evil side of town begins to surface, as Jeffrey encounters washed-up lounge singer Dorothy Vallens (Rossellini) and the out-of-control Frank Booth (Hopper), as well as a cavalcade of characters who are far removed from small-town sweetness.


Among the many pleasures of Blue Velvet is watching the multi-layered, intricate mystery unravel and develop. Consequently, it would be criminal to spoil anything else. The narrative is completely unpredictable, and the fusion of plot-based thriller, erotic drama, noir and surrealism makes this a truly enthralling experience. Blue Velvet is undoubtedly at the more conventional end of the Lynch spectrum, as the story moves in an uncomplicated, linear direction. Interestingly, the first act plays out like an edgy, '40s film noir pastiche. During this section, it does not take long to become drawn into the quirky but warm world and become intrigued by the mystery at the centre of the film. From here, however, Lynch steers the film in another direction - slowly and inexorably, the tension levels are ratcheted up as Jeffrey's investigation intensifies and crosses the line into voyeurism. Once Frank Booth enters the picture, though, everything goes to hell in a handbasket. Blue Velvet is also a masterpiece of style and atmosphere. Lynch generated an effective noir feel, but the movie is additionally permeated with a small-town essence, and these two feelings mix together to generate a unique look and feel.



Blue Velvet's opening sequence is a tour de force. Images are shown which are exported from the American Dream, with perfect houses complemented by white picket fences and immaculately manicured yards. Suddenly, the happiness vanishes as a man collapses to the ground. The camera follows him before burrowing into the ground; parting the blades of grass to reveal a colony of swarming bugs. This image conveys that perfection often hides deeply-rooted rot; that dreams can easily turn into nightmares; and that corruption is everywhere. Essentially, this opening scene holds the whole of Blue Velvet in microcosm; the contention that a malevolent rash of violence and moral decay festers underneath the surface of the American Dream. In this sense, Blue Velvet is a very downbeat picture. As a matter of fact, the only hint of optimism comes at the end: the sun emerges, the sky is blue, a jolly robin appears, and everything seems right in the world. Again, a veneer of perfection is presented. But then the robin is seen holding a beetle in its beak. The movie has thus come full circle brilliantly. It emphasises that the American Dream may be alive and well, but the rot and corruption nonetheless remains beneath the surface...ready to emerge at any time.


As Jeffrey Beaumont, Kyle MacLachlan is the perfect clean-cut boy. MacLachlan afforded a sense of innocence to the part which serves him well, and it's due to this quality that we can identity with the character as he begins his downward spiral into Dorothy and Frank's hellish world. In the role of Sandy, a young Laura Dern is the essential embodiment of the prim and proper good girl. Alongside this pair, Isabella Rossellini's performance is outstanding. Rossellini was able to capture the full breadth of Dorothy's complex personality - her vulnerability, degeneracy, desperation and longing, as well as her hatred for Frank and need for him. In all of her scenes, it's clear that Dorothy is mentally unstable and borderline psychotic, and Rossellini conveyed this with aplomb.



Also in the cast is Dennis Hopper. In his lifetime, Hopper played a number of vicious creatures, but never before or since did Hopper essay a role as sinister and purely evil as Frank; one of the most horrific, spine-chilling villains to grace the silver screen. Another masterstroke was to use Roy Orbison's song In Dreams during a number of Hopper's scenes. The tune contributes to the haunting disposition of these sequences, and, consequently, you will never hear the song the same way ever again. In Frank, Hopper and Lynch created such a spellbinding character that they inadvertently introduced the film's sole downfall - whenever Hopper is not around, the film is never as enthralling as it is whenever Hopper is on-screen. In fact, the lack of Hopper causes sluggish patches from time to time.


There is no doubt that Blue Velvet is full of disturbing moments, most of which involve sadomasochistic behaviour, degradation, sex, and elements of an even darker nature. But it is due to the inclusion of these moments that Blue Velvet succeeds in becoming a true masterpiece in all senses of the world, as none of these elements feel gratuitous or exploitative. Instead, the confrontational material is an intrinsic part of the story and mood, as these terrible things are part of everyday life in this quiet, peaceful little town. It drives the point home that no town is perfect, because something dark is always lurking beneath the surface called human nature. Thus, Blue Velvet is not an easy watch by any stretch, nor is it for people who like to watch pleasant, huggable movies. Those who can stomach this content, however, will find Lynch's movie to be the indisputable masterpiece that it is. And the more you re-watch the movie, you more you will appreciate it.

9.5/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very bizarre thriller!

Posted : 14 years, 1 month ago on 10 March 2010 02:50

Blue Velvet is a story that is very bizarre indeed but a story that I think everybody would really like because of how dark the story is. It is a very disturbing film because an ear is found in a field. The ear is a very deep effect on not just the murder investigation but also the characters. It deeply affects their lives as well. The classic scene is definitely the scene where Jeffrey was going to a woman called Dorothy's flat and he found her there. She makes him strip naked and performs an act of fellatio on him while sticking a knife at him. That is a very crude scene but a very realistic scene. The way this film was made was very well done because it is a really dark, mind-blowing thriller that is probably one of Lynch's darkest films so far. It was a very hard film to understand at first but once I got into the film after about 30 minutes I started to really enjoy it. The way the opening credits rolled was the same way the ending credits rolled with blue velvet curtains. That was an introduction to what the two words mean put together. It shows actual blue velvets to start with but when curtains opened the Blue Velvet film began and it did the same with the end. The curtains closed and it finished. Isabella Rossellini was really good as Dorothy Vallens because she was obviously a very mixed up woman with a few problems. Isabella made her quite weird looking even though that is part of the character anyway. Her performance as Dorothy was really weird as well as powerful.


Kyle MacLaughan's performance as Jeffery Beaumont was awesome as well because he was like an innocent victim until he spotted the ear in the field and he is suddenly part of the case. He takes the ear to the police which leads to his scenes with Dorothy. He is like a rookie and a trainee in the case of the murdered person. Dennis Hopper's performance as Frank Booth was the best out of all of them because he was really good at playing that cold, foul-mouthed, violent and sociopath to his personality. He is a very fearful villain. He is also sexually screwed up because he had different types of sex with Dorothy whenever he wanted to. The acts are all very crude which is very dark of course. He even has orgasms with rage and pleasure at the same time which is very weird. I haven't seen Dennis Hopper in any film at all yet but he was really good as Frank though.


David Lynch directed this film like it was very important for the audience as well as himself because his previous film Dune which turned out to be a critical failure. He wanted it to be a more personal story which a somewhat type of characters to his 1977 film Eraserhead which was his first film. This is a very typical Lynch film for quite a few different reasons and they are because it is dark, rather bizarre and a story with a powerful development of characters. Those three facts are the main reasons why I turned out to love this one and can I be blamed? No! The script was really awesome. Lynch had two different drafts of the script before filming but he finally concluded to write an absolutely amazing script that didn't have one single flaw. This is probably the most creative script he has ever written.


David Lynch has created another modern piece of art. Unfortunately Blue Velvet isn't my favourite Lynch film but it is one of his best and is certainly one of the best crime thrillers ever. I prefer The Elephant Man and Mulholland Drive of the ones I have seen from Lynch thus far. Blue Velvet is definitely one of the best films of the 1980s. Also, Blue Velvet has one of the greatest scripts I have ever listened to as well.


0 comments, Reply to this entry