Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Assault on Precinct 13 review

Posted : 6 months, 2 weeks ago on 15 October 2023 01:58

(BluRay) 'A fucking western in modern LA where the fucking injuns are a mysteriou mixed gang'. That could be a good conservative resume of this little, non starred, pure dramatic concentratated, with a litle hawksian group (the girl is more active than Angie Dickinsonin Rio Bravo)...


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Assault on Precinct 13 review

Posted : 9 years, 6 months ago on 26 October 2014 07:44

An assault on anyone's intelligence, if they are over the age of 13. The producers have replaced reality with fiction and once-decent actors with caricatures.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 years, 3 months ago on 3 January 2013 10:52

John Carpenter’s movies have always been appreciated by the remakers and, so far, already 4 of his classics have been remade (‘The Thing’, ‘The Fog’, ‘Halloween’ and of course ‘Assault on Precinct 13’) . However, this time, if I’m not mistaken, Carpenter picked up the director himself and chose Jean-Francois Richet, a rather unknown French director at least abroad who made some solid flicks in France so I was really curious to see the end-result. Unfortunately, it is quite common for European or Foreign directors to make their debut in America with a remake and, usually, the outcome is pretty disappointing. And indeed, unfortunately for Richet, his American debut was far from being impressive, I’m afraid. I have to confess, I first saw this remake and then many years later, the original version made by Carpenter but after seeing the real thing, the issue with this remake was even more obvious. In my opinion, the first version was pretty good but nothing really amazing but, above all, most of the choice made concerning this flick were made because there was basically not enough money and to remake this with a budget ten times bigger didn’t make much sense. The fact that it looked cheap made it in fact more appealing and it was definitely part of its charm. Furthermore, this time, they modified the plot and basically removed the darker tone, the political/sociological message and instead, they gave us some rather standard action fare with some really annoying multiple twists. I’ll give you that, there was a pretty neat cast (Ethan Hawke, Laurence Fishburne, Gabriel Byrne, Maria Bello, Drea de Matteo, John Leguizamo) but, a part from that, there was not much to enjoy with this remake. To conclude, I thought it was a rather disappointing action flick and it is not really worth a look in my opinion.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A Backward Glance

Posted : 11 years, 8 months ago on 24 August 2012 06:48

I write a lot of my reviews from memory-- for me, it's a lot like journaling.

I saw this movie a long time ago, because Laurence Fishburne, (Morpheus), was in it.

Actors only ever really play one part-- themselves. And whether Morpheus is playing a cop-killer, here, or "Othello"--which I actually didn't see, but I can see him in it-- or a young white boy's unofficial chess tutor, or the grand tutor of the One.... There's just something about him.... He's just that guy, you know, he's just that sort of guy that I used to know.

Funny how we change. Yes, in a different world, we were friends.... In that lost world-- the past....

But anyway, yeah, the movie was entertaining, although not great.... And I suppose that that's more or less what I *always* thought about it....

It's hard to explain.

And, I don't know if I can recall anything very quotable that he said in this one-- I mean, I remember that he said at least a few cool things, but not well enough to quote them-- but sometimes he just had that way of being that friend I wanted.... And of course he was that black friend, but what he really was was that friend that a guy has, you know.... And sometimes, he would just say something, and it would just be that way that you have of talking between yourselves, and it almost didn't matter whether he was being the coach or the conspirator in that moment.... Like, in "Bobby Fischer", he says, "Are you okay?", and in the "Matrix", he says-- "I know *exactly* what you mean."

But, I don't know, all of that is awhile ago now, for me. It was a nice 'pasatiempo' at the time, and now, it's a memory.

(7/10)


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Forgettable action romp

Posted : 15 years, 9 months ago on 6 July 2008 11:31

Rosen: "Your eyes are red. You been smokin' crack?"
Beck: "Your eyes are glazed. You been eatin' donuts?"


Assault on Precinct 13 is the contemporary remake of John Carpenter's 1976 action thriller of the same name. However, this is an uncommon instance of a remake that circumvents the customary cliché of being an identical duplicate of the original. This is austerely a remake by name and raw concept only; merely inhibiting an insignificant number of scenes perceptibly influenced by Carpenter's 1976 film. This remake is solid in terms of the attractive production values, the impressive visual style adapted by French director Jean-Francois Richet, the booming sound effects, the noisy score and the exciting action. Below the remarkably good-looking film, the script leaves much to be desired. Assault on Precinct 13 expands upon the original film in terms of plot points and character development; ultimately providing an extra added layer of disbelief at every turn. Instead of the adept, engaging character presented in the original we are shown a cluster of dumb characters implementing stupendous acts and delivering contrived dialogue.

The lone aspect of the film's plot that mirrors the original is the concept of a siege on a police precinct that is due to close its doors very soon. Aside from that, the plot is dissimilar. On a snowy New Years Eve, a skeleton crew are manning police precinct 13. Guilt-ridden former undercover narc Jake Roenick (Hawke) is undertaking a boring desk job at the precinct until the official closing. Due to a howling snow storm unfolding outside, a prison bus transporting a number of criminals is forced to divert to the station for the night. Among them is renowned recently arrested crime kingpin Marion Bishop (Fishburne). Isolated by the relentless blizzard, and cut off from communication with the outside world, the precinct is rapidly bordered by well-armed hostile forces. Roenick, burned-out and still filled with remorse, digs deep for his long-lost heroism and pride to hold the fort until dawn.

The creative team behind Assault on Precinct 13 had the right idea of altering aspects originally present in Carpenter's original. As a result, this is a re-imagining with potential. With such potential, the filmmakers could have created a superior movie. However the law of Hollywood remakes is that script flaws befall the rest of the production. In this case, almost every move made by the characters is stupid, illogical and unrealistic. In a claustrophobic situation such as this, no characters are ever granted half a brain. Despite the intense action and a few interesting moments, the script flaws can't be overlooked. Characters execute the most predictable acts in the book. Of course the cons aren't going to follow orders...that would be too unconventional for an action movie! Sticking to the original in that aspect would have been a benefit. There are also the glaring errors in logic. For example, people dismissing gunshots as fireworks...when fireworks can't even be set off in the blizzard?! There are several more instances, but I'd be spoiling a few mildly interesting scenes. It's also interesting to note that the original showed brutality to every character without a hint of sentimentality. In this remake, more characters survive and hence the film is less brutal.

French director Richet is unable to recapture the sense of claustrophobia and confinement. He's competent in filming solid action scenes but there isn't any sense of being cut off from the world as much as the feeling instilled by Carpenter. One of the film's redeeming features is the cast. Ethan Hawke is credible in the title role. Laurence Fishburne has always possessed the skill to be commanding and authoritative whenever appearing on the screen. He again flexes his great skill here. Gabriel Byrne is a sinister villain who's unfortunately underused and underdeveloped. Other characters include blatant racial stereotypes in the black characters, and a few despicably shown people for the cons.

Overall, Assault on Precinct 13 is a wasted opportunity. Instead of intelligence in its script, the filmmakers seemingly aimed to create solid and intense action scenes infused with incredible sound effects that will give your speakers a workout. Impressive considering the $20 million budget the filmmakers had to stretch. But this action is futile if there isn't anything behind it...in this case there are endless clichés, predictable events and contrived dialogue...not to mention flaws in geography and logic. It's violent, riveting, sometimes exciting and competently made, but ultimately very stupid!

5.2/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry