Login
This was really lame and pathetic! How is it considered a sequel? None of the actors are the same. It takes place in Romania. Evil Ed is still alive. Peter Vincent has no accent! Jaime Murray doesn't show any skin! There is graphic nudity that is pretty much unnecessary if they aren't going to show Jaime Murray (who is ridiculously hot in this) as well. The Charley guy looked like someone you would find at Hot Topic and really doesn't look like Fright Night Charley anymore. The acting was not very good. The plot was rehashed from several vampire stories and was almost the same exact thing as the previous film except Jaime Murray's character has a few differences than Colin Farrells' character. It shouldn't even be called Fright Night let alone say part 2. It is definitely a non-canon and nonsensical sequel just to throw some nudity into a direct to DVD sequel that not many people will even see. It isn't the worst thing if you see it without knowing the first one, but it is definitely not very good. I would say more than likely you will hate this film.
