Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
285 Views
2
vote

A PG-13 Die Hard catastrophe!

"All you gotta do is go pick up a kid down in New Jersey, and drive him down to D.C. How hard can that be, huh?"

Live Free or Die Hard was released twelve years after the last outing of John McClane in 1995's Die Hard With a Vengeance, and the hero is a changed man. Trapped in a digitally manipulated cinematic world controlled by a studio motivated by profit rather than integrity, seeing McClane on the big screen again is just not the same. Live Free or Die Hard is Die Hard in name only - the film stars Bruce Willis and has plenty of action, but it is not Die Hard. Rather than visceral thrills, a true sense of danger and pulse-pounding excitement, Live Free is an appallingly generic creation manufactured by a roomful of studio executives whose only concern is to reach the widest demographic, quality be damned. Armed with a goddamn PG-13 rating, it's a crushingly bland, forgettable and inexcusably moronic action film that resembles Michael Bay more than John McTiernan. Then again, at least Bay makes R-rated action films like Bad Boys and The Rock.


A computer mastermind, Thomas Gabriel (Timothy Olyphant) looks to bring America to its knees by taking control of all computer systems and systematically disabling the country's infrastructure. Now divorced and estranged from his children, John McClane (Bruce Willis) is assigned to travel to Washington, D.C. to pick up computer hacker Matt Farrell (Justin Long), who's wanted by the FBI for questioning in relation to Gabriel's scheme. As it turns out, Farrell inadvertently helped Gabriel achieve his goals and has been targeted for assassination. With armed henchmen looking to kill Farrell, and with all hell breaking loose across the country, McClane pairs up with the frightened young hacker as he sets out to stop Gabriel. However, the mission soon becomes personal when Gabriel kidnaps McClane's daughter, Lucy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead).

Willis went into damage control a few months before Live Free polluted cinemas, trawling Ain't It Cool News to assure people that the film will still satisfy despite its PG-13 rating. How wrong he was. It's a far more significant issue than Willis or Fox would like you to believe, as it robs the picture of the immediacy and badass violence that has grown to define the franchise. McClane still shoots the bad guys, but they expire out of frame and refuse to bleed, which actually harms coherence. In an early apartment shootout, for instance, McClane shoots a henchman, but it's unclear exactly where. Hence, when the wounded henchman continues walking and shooting after reacting to being shot, one must wonder where on earth he was hit. Profanity was eliminated from the script, as well, with McClane forbidden from uttering curse words to convey his frustration or spice up his wisecracks. McClane never feels out of his element in Live Free, thus there's no sense of peril. Director Len Wiseman may be able to stage big set pieces, but he cannot create danger or desperation for the life in him. Everything feels so calculated and emotionless, with writer Mark Bomback throwing in an action scene every ten minutes willy-nilly to please the teenagers.


Die Hard was a cinematic godsend in 1988, as it was a grounded action film in a sea of over-the-top action fiestas. On the other hand, Live Free replaces gritty action with the exact type of logic-bending spectacle that the original Die Hard provided sweet relief from. When Gabriel blacks out a tunnel in one scene, the drivers, for some reason, accelerate into the darkness instead of switching on their headlights or, you know, braking. Later, McClane taunts and provokes Gabriel when he's threatening to shoot his daughter in the head. It's empty-headed, gung-ho scripting intended to raise cheers from the teen crowd, but mature Die Hard consumers will realise how dumb it is. And I know henchmen cannot shoot straight, but to this extent is ludicrous, with McClane shooting a fire extinguisher in front of armed guards for 5-10 seconds...but said guards do not even raise their guns. And then there is the infamous jet scene, which is high atop the list of "Stupidest Action Scenes In Film History." Yes, McClane brawled on a plane wing in Die Hard 2 and surfed a truck in Vengeance, but that stuff is at least somewhat believable. This, on the other hand, is moronic in too many conceivable ways. It goes on and on, but suffice it to say, none of the over-the-top action beats, no matter how much money was thrown at them, come close to matching the intensity of the final standoff at the end of the first Die Hard.

To Wiseman's credit, it's admirable to see action scenes lensed with steady photography, free of the shaky cam that plagues modern action films. However, the editing is often shoddy. ADR is painfully obvious at times, close-ups occasionally don't match long shots, and continuity looks messy from time to time. Furthermore, while the surface sheen is enticing for teens, Wiseman is tone-deaf for atmosphere, place and general grittiness. John is thrown through a glass window at one stage but only walks away with a tiny cut when it should have resulted in a gushing wound. Plus, compare the ambience of the police precinct of Vengeance to the glossy, clean-feeling FBI computer centre here. The FBI HQ generally feels like a set created by a production designer beset with "cool" things, while the precinct in Vengeance is simple and believable. Added to this, there's the corny and trite "passing of the torch" material in the script, another PG-13-friendly addition to try and reach the teens. See, McClane shows Matt how to be "that guy." It's sickening and out-of-place in a Die Hard movie. Speaking of the dialogue, it's horrible. Rather than exuberant chatter, everyone talks in clichรฉd action movie speak, and there are only one or two McClane wisecracks that are worthwhile, none of which are fit to hold a candle to the best quotes from the original Die Hard.


Perhaps Live Free's biggest sin is the way it desecrates the character of John McClane. In Die Hard, he's a potty-mouthed, cigarette-smoking, vulnerable and fully-rounded action hero who worries about his chances of survival and delivers a tearful message for his wife. Here, McClane is an unstoppable terminator who marches onwards, killing effortlessly and tactfully abusing Gabriel even though his daughter is a hostage. And it's a goddamn insult to hear McClane's trademark "Yippi-ki-yay motherfucker" line being cut off by a fucking gunshot. Additionally, Willis looks incredibly bored throughout, as if he had a terrible time on set. Kevin Smith (who has a cameo) famously spoke out about Willis's constant clashes with Fox executives, and it shows in his performance; he looks depressed to be taking part in this PG-13 travesty.

The supporting cast is woeful. The Die Hard trilogy is beset with colourful supporting characters, all of whom have distinguishable personalities and deliver worthwhile dialogue. Live Free comes up short in this respect. Most awful is Timothy Olyphant, a great actor who drops the ball in this crucial role. He needed to be a badass villain able to intimidate and threaten, but he's a complete fail - he looks like a Walmart manager at the end of a long day shift. McClane deserves a far more dangerous and charismatic villain. At one stage, Gabriel even exclaims that it would be preferable for him to mastermind the attack rather than a foreign terrorist who'll do worse things. Even the script is aware that Gabriel is a fucking pussy? Justin Long, meanwhile, is purely insufferable, a whiny sidekick with none of the charm of Samuel L. Jackson or Reginald VelJohnson. Long's chemistry with McClane fizzles when it should soar. The only worthwhile actors here are Cyril Raffaelli and Mary Elizabeth Winstead; the former is a capable acrobat who pulls off some impressive stunts, while Winstead is good eye candy and makes the most of her role.


For 13-year-old boys who enjoy Transformers and other such summer blockbusters, Live Free or Die Hard is for you. Literally, Fox designed the movie specifically for you. Enjoy it. Or maybe you won't, and you'll see this awful movie for the superficial trash that it is and realise that you deserve a lot better. And do not even get me started on the unrated edition, which adds obvious, phoney CGI blood puffs and a few lines of profanity that were clearly dubbed after the fact. Live Free is simply atrocious, an absolute embarrassment to the Die Hard moniker. While watching it, you'll just keep wanting to turn it off and watch the original trilogy instead. Die Hard 2 may get flack, but it's head over heels better than this tosh. With twelve years to make another Die Hard, is this really the best they could come up with?

3.2/10

Avatar
Added by PvtCaboose91
11 years ago on 7 February 2013 13:59

Votes for this - View all
VixHappy Vader