Login
I've seen a hell of a lot worse than this so I don't see what some people are complaining about. What do they expect anyway with a title like this? I will say though that even for a movie with a $2,000,000 budget the CGI does seem cheaper than it should. I'm sure how much it costs to do CGI but I would think it would be a little bit better with a budget like that. As far as the movie goes I found the acting to be good, the music was ok, and there wasn't that many boring parts. The overall flow was good enough to keep my attention for 90 minutes. I almost gave this a 3/5 but I couldn't because of the CGI. They even use CGI to make the gun fire shots, come on man! Can't cost that much for real blanks! I'm a huge Roger Corman fan so when I saw he was doing a bunch of these giant monster movies I had to see them. This is my first one to see but if this is the worst of the bunch then I can't wait to see the others.
Total Dinoshark Kills: 26 (18 men, 8 women)
First Kill: 4:07
Last Kill: 1:23:53
Victims Eaten: 15
Swears: 3
Scene's with Blood: 15
Blood Splats on Camera Lens: 2
Explosions: 3
Objects Destroyed: 4
Tits: 0
Close Ups of Girls in Bikinis: 9
