Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
362 Views
4
vote

28 Days Later Much Better.

I was honestly expecting much much more out of this film, and thought there was no way it could be bad, due to it being a sequel to one of the best horror movies ever made, "28 Days Later", which was a very successful motion picture back in 2002. "28 Weeks Later" lacked the qualities that made the original so great. Here are a few aspects missing: Story, Acting, Character Development. Those are a few main things keeping this from topping the original. I did leave out another thing however. Usually movies carry over to their sequels, for example the "Ocean's Films". The same characters were in all three, and the story continued as well. "28 Weeks Later" had absolutely nothing similar from the first. The characters were different, and the story was brand new and started out fresh. That bugged me because I was hooked on "Days", and they just basically screwed it up for me.

I will admit, this film was not all bad. The pros of it are the intense action scenes. There were several sniper shots that looked rather cool, and there were plenty others to entertain me. Another positive aspect was the way the zombies looked. They did a good job there.

Although this film may be filled with non-stop action and suspense, It just wasn't developed enough to make a good sequel.

6/10
Avatar
Added by The Cineast
15 years ago on 15 November 2008 06:08

Votes for this - View all
The O.P.VixLexi