A bad movie

Honestly, I didn’t like ‘Garfield’ at all. I mean, even if the cat was rather well made from a technical point of view, the plot was terribly lame and had nothing to do with the strip-book whatsoever (a rather awesome strip-book as a matter of fact). Anyway, if I didn’t like this sequel, why should I bother watch the sequel? Well, I guess, since it was on TV and I just love wasting my time watching some major garbage, I just ended up watching this flick. Another thing that bothered me is that, in 'Zombieland', Bill Murray complained that the only movie that really embarrassed him was 'Garfield'. I'm pretty sure that they didn't made this up in the movie but maybe they did. The question is why would he bother even making this sequel?!? Ok, there is, as always, the money factor, I guess, but still. Anyway, I watched it with my step-son (I know, it is a very lame excuse...) but I thought the whole thing was just plain boring. I mean, at this point, there was almost nothing left from the original comic-book in here and the whole thing was pretty much worthless. To conclude, it is pretty bad and not worth a look, except maybe if you are under 13 years old.

4/10