Login
Well at least Patrick Lussier and Joel Soisson stuck with their series. I still can't believe Wes Craven presented these. I wasn't even aware that these were another of those back to back filmed horror sequels. I guess it's something these guys like to do. Tom Kane is the only actor who has been in all three films albeit different characters each time. The previous film had good enough moments that at times I appreciated it even though it was clearly not all that good. Hopefully this one will be similar in that aspect. At least Roy Scheider returns and Rutger Hauer joins the party. So this starts off exactly where the previous ended. Why show the weird screaming in the grass shot again? It looks like they are showing a lot of recap from the previous film for some reason. Well I know where this is going. Oh she is kind of hot. Wow that guy needs to not speak for his parts lol. Yeah Uffizi don't play. I don't think it was said in the last film, but it's obvious here that the Cardinal is blind. That seems a bit random though. Oh damn dude. That guy looks familiar. Yes indeed he is from one of the other awful back to back sequels Return of the Living Dead: Rave to the Grave. He may not be a good actor, but he is amusing. Oh shit did the dog do that or what? 800lb doors doesn't seem likely. Wow that caught me off guard. So what's behind curtain number 2? WTF a vampire on stilts?! Well it's original that's for sure. Holy shit he just cut it in half wow! I swear these movies are off the wall. Okay I swear this is just too hilarious sometimes. I don't think that was fooling anyone except for her. Damn he got messed up. That's different. Does this guy ever listen? The body count here is probably the highest of the trilogy by far. I guess that explains what is going on with that whole screaming business. Going back to his Vlad the Impaler roots then. That really is an unnecessary amount of satellites. See that is how most situations would really go. Is the too fast and blurry to see the action necessary? Okay so what happened to Dracula II? Are they going to explain that or just let us make assumptions. I can't believe we get less new Dracula footage than the other parts of the trilogy. I mean we don't even see him until less than the last half hour! See they really screwed up now. Oh no! Well that is quite a turn of events for sure. That's really gotta be a downer. Did they seriously just do a they are saying the same lines crap? So the shot at the end was kind of cool. So overall this was still not the worse these guys have done, but it wasn't nearly as enjoyable as part two unfortunately.
