Login
I honestly don't know why I bother watching the sequels to Jarhead. They are simply cashing in on the name. They don't even carry along the same general point the first one was making. They are just action films. Now don't get me wrong I liked the second one. It's a good action movie, but it's not Jarhead. This one may not be so lucky. It's a direct to DVD, TV movie, streaming sequel with absolutely no correlation to it's predecessors. The only redeeming qualities are Dennis Haysbert and Scott Adkins. Now I will go ahead and see what this film has to offer in terms of it's own idea. Okay for the most part the action is awesome. Most of the acting was decent except maybe Dante Basco. It does for the most part give a sense of the whole thing with the original Jarhead about not being used to combat and sort of just sitting and waiting. Then it changes and for the last half of the movie there is just non stop action. Would have been cool if they just went and called it The Siege. Other than that it's a decent flick despite the way it's put out there.
