LoginYet another "Pics Deleted" confusion issue
Deleted user
Deleted
12 years ago at Apr 27 6:07 - I have seen this issue in the forums before but never paid attention to them. I have had a bunch of pics deleted, some of them for "Nudity/Sexual" - they were image of models such as Rianne Ten Haken etc, but I could understand why as the Nips were directly showing in those even though they were posed for ads.
But today there were 2 pics deleted for "Nudity/Sexual" which made no sense at all, specifically of Suki Waterhouse
www.listal.com/viewimage/5026522
www.listal.com/viewimage/5025173
In the first one she is clearly wearing a top (with nothing underneath). So you see the contour, but there are a lot of V.S. images on the site which are even more clear than this.
The 2nd one, she's clearly wearing a bikini for heaven sake and no contours can even be seen. How does this qualify for Nudity/Sexual deletion???
And another image was deleted for "Other"
www.listal.com/viewimage/5025092
It's a news shot from the Elle mag awards ceremony, so it's clearly public domain, unless I'm truly missing something here.
I like this site a lot, and I do understand that the moderators are doing a service, but inexplicable decisions like these with no attached explanations only end up seeming arbitrary. I really would like to know why these 3 images were deleted.
But today there were 2 pics deleted for "Nudity/Sexual" which made no sense at all, specifically of Suki Waterhouse
www.listal.com/viewimage/5026522
www.listal.com/viewimage/5025173
In the first one she is clearly wearing a top (with nothing underneath). So you see the contour, but there are a lot of V.S. images on the site which are even more clear than this.
The 2nd one, she's clearly wearing a bikini for heaven sake and no contours can even be seen. How does this qualify for Nudity/Sexual deletion???
And another image was deleted for "Other"
www.listal.com/viewimage/5025092
It's a news shot from the Elle mag awards ceremony, so it's clearly public domain, unless I'm truly missing something here.
I like this site a lot, and I do understand that the moderators are doing a service, but inexplicable decisions like these with no attached explanations only end up seeming arbitrary. I really would like to know why these 3 images were deleted.
Moderator
brazilfashion
12 years ago at Apr 27 6:16 - Collages are also not okay, as stated in the rules.
Likewise, nudity including see through is NOT allowed. I was also concerned it might have been taken when she was underage.
If nudity is not allowed, it means no pictures with nipples showing whatsoever. Even if it is tasteful. Private parts showing is NEVER okay. It is stated in the rules. I don't see how that is in anyway unclear.
I suggest you read this detailed list about the image rules, it should explain the stuff: www.listal.com/list/image-rules-rough-draft
Please read the rules (and perhaps current forum threads) before making a new thread. Thank you.
Likewise, nudity including see through is NOT allowed. I was also concerned it might have been taken when she was underage.
If nudity is not allowed, it means no pictures with nipples showing whatsoever. Even if it is tasteful. Private parts showing is NEVER okay. It is stated in the rules. I don't see how that is in anyway unclear.
I suggest you read this detailed list about the image rules, it should explain the stuff: www.listal.com/list/image-rules-rough-draft
Please read the rules (and perhaps current forum threads) before making a new thread. Thank you.
This thread has been locked by a moderator so you cannot reply to this thread.