is the xbox 360 a good system?

im thinking of geting an xbox 360 tell me if this is a good game system if u think it sucks tell me or tell the things that u dont like about it because im getting it in the summer and i want to be ready for the bad stuff but i think it is going to be super cool!

If you're going for no frills, its slightly cheaper than PS3. Its had about a years headstart so there are still more games for it, though that could be changing soon. Xbox live is probably the best online gaming experience on a console.
As for the negative: Red ring of death. Unless it flashes three times its not covered by the warranty. Newer 360's have a much smaller occurrence of this but it still happens.
As for the negative: Red ring of death. Unless it flashes three times its not covered by the warranty. Newer 360's have a much smaller occurrence of this but it still happens.

all old xbox360s... 30% failure rate
all new & improved models - so far about 12% (but since they're new, I think the figure will go higher) - so silent killer, it may be smaller occurance, but still over 10 times the failure rates of the competitors (PS3 and Wii are 1% failure rates) and would keep me from investing into games if the console itself is a bloody lemon that won't last a year.
But I can see by your name that you think Halo is the best thing under the sun, so what's the point in 'selling' you pros and cons.
all new & improved models - so far about 12% (but since they're new, I think the figure will go higher) - so silent killer, it may be smaller occurance, but still over 10 times the failure rates of the competitors (PS3 and Wii are 1% failure rates) and would keep me from investing into games if the console itself is a bloody lemon that won't last a year.
But I can see by your name that you think Halo is the best thing under the sun, so what's the point in 'selling' you pros and cons.
Deleted user

Well you shouldn't listen to other people and get it based on your own thoughts. I think you should get it then if you don't like it return it. Don't waste your time thinking if you should get it or not, Just get it and find out if you like it.

Instead of saving up for a 360 I bought a DS. I don't play enough games anymore to warrant spending about $400 on a console. Although if one was offered to me, no strings attached I would not hesitate. I want to play DOA 4.

if 3 out of 10 people who buy and Xbox360 get a red ring of death, then it would be wise to listen to what other people say. Do you not understand the situation at all? Its a hardware problem, related to using lead-free solder that doesn't hold up to the heat of the graphics card. 30% is absolutely unnacceptable (in Europe, class action lawsuits are starting against the 360). 1% is the norm for electronics. That means an Xbox360 is 30 times more likely to fail prematurely than all other consoles, and yes, that should make you think about if you really want to spend $400 on that.
as mentioned before, they 'improved' it to around 12% failure, which is much better than 30%, but its still twelve times worse than other electronic equipment, so its not like they fixed the problem. Go look into forums, some are on their fifth or sixth Xbox360.
as mentioned before, they 'improved' it to around 12% failure, which is much better than 30%, but its still twelve times worse than other electronic equipment, so its not like they fixed the problem. Go look into forums, some are on their fifth or sixth Xbox360.

im still saving for mine.

Wow. Good to know you listen to reason. *rolls eyes*
Honestly, if I were buying a system now, I probably wouldn't buy any of them, because to be honest, all of them suck.
Never, I repeat, NEVER buy a system for just one game.
Honestly, if I were buying a system now, I probably wouldn't buy any of them, because to be honest, all of them suck.
Never, I repeat, NEVER buy a system for just one game.

well thats your opinion, and you're allowed to have it. but my opinion is all three systems are awesome in their own way, so just get system best suited for you. just giving you pros and cons for X360 as the thread starter asked:
biggest pro: great game library
biggest con: flaky hardware (if you do buy one, make sure to keep it nice and cool, maybe add extra fans around the system)
biggest pro: great game library
biggest con: flaky hardware (if you do buy one, make sure to keep it nice and cool, maybe add extra fans around the system)

pro: custom faceplate. If you're into that kind of thing.

Well, all I'm saying is that I would wait and see which platform pulls ahead. Right now they are all kinda dead even....except the 360 does have some of the best games.
Basically, the 360 has the best games out currently, and I believe it has the best controller, but it does have faulty hardware. Get the warranty. You have to pay for X-box live, but after seeing Nintendo's attempt at internet on the Wii, you'll be grateful for at least a fair online experience.
If I would choose one that is probably the best bargain, I would pick the 360.
Basically, the 360 has the best games out currently, and I believe it has the best controller, but it does have faulty hardware. Get the warranty. You have to pay for X-box live, but after seeing Nintendo's attempt at internet on the Wii, you'll be grateful for at least a fair online experience.
If I would choose one that is probably the best bargain, I would pick the 360.

Right now they are all kinda dead even
really? where do you get your source? the Wii is outselling the 2nd place console (xbox360 for long time, but overtaken by PS3 now) by a margin of 2:1, each month, every month.
This message has been deleted. Reason: off topic

it seems kinda kool to me.

i only like the 360 for Rock Band and Gears of War, other than that, i don't care for it.

well it has a lot of stuff built right in it.

really? where do you get your source? the Wii is outselling the 2nd place console (xbox360 for long time, but overtaken by PS3 now) by a margin of 2:1, each month, every month.
I mean in features, not in sales. Windows sells more than macs, but that doesn't mean that Windows is better. Quite the opposite.

oh what a load of croc, DoK. You said 'right now, they're all dead even'. Of course you meant sales, because if you meant 'dead even' in features, that wouldn't make any sense at all. Then again, that's sort of expected from you.
I read the papers too. I always come across an article or two that says the 'Wii is a fad', 'they are collecting dust', 'nobody is buying new games for their Wii', and so on. a big *ROLL EYES* to all those articles, because it's now 17 months since release, and all my local stores are STILL sold out of Wii (while X360 and PS3 boxes, there is a plenty on the shelves), and sales charts just came in for Canada for month of March - SSBB #1 selling game (200,000 copies in Canada alone), #2 is X360's Vegas 2, and #3 is Wii Play. Two of top three games sold past month are for the Wii, but once again, you have all these 'gaming experts' telling us all the Wii sales are just a virus-marketing gimmick, and nobody is buying or keeping on playing their Wii.
I think the Wii has proven its no longer about the uber graphics with a pathetic 5 hrs gameplay. People want fun titles, party titles, casual titles. And all the idiotic game developers that are stubbornly sticking with only X360 and PS3 because they think the Wii is a fad will feel it in their pocketbooks over the next few years.
I read the papers too. I always come across an article or two that says the 'Wii is a fad', 'they are collecting dust', 'nobody is buying new games for their Wii', and so on. a big *ROLL EYES* to all those articles, because it's now 17 months since release, and all my local stores are STILL sold out of Wii (while X360 and PS3 boxes, there is a plenty on the shelves), and sales charts just came in for Canada for month of March - SSBB #1 selling game (200,000 copies in Canada alone), #2 is X360's Vegas 2, and #3 is Wii Play. Two of top three games sold past month are for the Wii, but once again, you have all these 'gaming experts' telling us all the Wii sales are just a virus-marketing gimmick, and nobody is buying or keeping on playing their Wii.
I think the Wii has proven its no longer about the uber graphics with a pathetic 5 hrs gameplay. People want fun titles, party titles, casual titles. And all the idiotic game developers that are stubbornly sticking with only X360 and PS3 because they think the Wii is a fad will feel it in their pocketbooks over the next few years.
Deleted user

all my local stores are STILL sold out of Wii
I'm not sure that really means anything these days. Supply and demand can easily be fixed; the manufacturer just releases enough to cause this demand and ta-da! It looks like they're selling like hotcakes! This in itself generates a buzz and more interest... which creates more of a demand.
But getting back to the topic of whether the xbox is worth a purchase... I think the only thing this thread proves is that it's all an individual matter. It depends on what you're looking for and what you want out of a game system. What someone likes about the product might turn out to be something that you hate about it and vice versa.

Voxy, it's not strictly supply/demand buzz-generating issue. I talked to the store and they told me they selling more Wii systems than PS3 and X360 systems put together. Its just each time they get a shipment, its sold out in hours. And national sales figure in Canada and US support this 2:1 sales pattern. But what is Nintendo to do? open up twice as many factories? They're already outselling competition two to one, so why bump up capacity? The sold-out buzz it generates is an added bonus, not a planned marketing ploy.
Deleted user

I just find it incredibly hard to believe that over a year and a half after it has been released, they've still had trouble increasing production (since they did apparently increase their workforce to meet the demands.) It just smells entirely too fishy as very few other products ever have this problem.
At any rate... off topic.
At any rate... off topic.

Whats that Gamemaster System it has on it? I remember reading about it when I was going for an interview for a magazine. I had to read an sheet of facts on the X-Box 360 and then create an article for it.
It was a unique edition where it gives your Console Points depending on what games you complete and how much of them you have completed. Any light?
It was a unique edition where it gives your Console Points depending on what games you complete and how much of them you have completed. Any light?

dude x-box 360 is the best thing thats ever happened in man kind and thats a fact

really? a planned-to-be-obsolete-in-5-years game system is the best thing to ever happen to mankind? well, as long you say its a fact, I guess I can't argue with that logic.

Good one GB!! I hear sliced bread has gone on strike now, after your little announcement.
Lets hope they dont have any union ties, God forbid if 'electricity', 'penicillin' and 'The Wheel' got in on it!!
Lets hope they dont have any union ties, God forbid if 'electricity', 'penicillin' and 'The Wheel' got in on it!!
Deleted user

The Wii is called a fad console because it cannot compete with the Xbox or PS3 in terms of raw computing power. Without the wiimote, it wouldn't have sold nearly as many units. Also take into account the fact that it is much cheaper and aimed at the less serious gamer and you can imagine that it becomes quite an appealing impulse buy that then has to rely on making the most out of the interactive controller element - or else!
We had a Wii in our university house and it was great for ritualistic humiliation of our friends and each other in regards to unhealthy we were, but we were soon reaching for the Halo multiplayer option once the novelty had worn thin. I have nothing against the Wii, but sales don't refute the claims that it is a gimmicky console. It has the back catalogue of previous generation gaming consoles - emulator style - for example. Neat feature, but one that probably enhances the sales figures even more, as well as its drastically cheaper price. In fact, I think that now that Xbox has slashed prices, it is catching up in terms of sales figures.
We had a Wii in our university house and it was great for ritualistic humiliation of our friends and each other in regards to unhealthy we were, but we were soon reaching for the Halo multiplayer option once the novelty had worn thin. I have nothing against the Wii, but sales don't refute the claims that it is a gimmicky console. It has the back catalogue of previous generation gaming consoles - emulator style - for example. Neat feature, but one that probably enhances the sales figures even more, as well as its drastically cheaper price. In fact, I think that now that Xbox has slashed prices, it is catching up in terms of sales figures.

I dont know how it is on your side of the pond, but Xbox360 is no catching up anything in sales over here. Wii is 2:1 over second place (has been like that every month since its launch), and just recently PS3 is outselling the Xbox360, but just by a slight margin. If any console will catch up to the Wii, I'd bet its the PS3. But not until mid 2009 or so.
Deleted user

I was talking about global sales figures, which should encompass your side of the pond too!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Console_war#Worldwide_sales_figures_6
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Console_war#Worldwide_sales_figures_6

I own all 3 systems and like them all for different reasons. I can see why some would value one system over another, but that doesn't inherently make one "better" than the other. They all have their own quirks/faults. It just comes down to what type of gaming experience an individual player values best.
I would like to dispute some of the notions put forward in this thread:
The Wii is called a fad console because it cannot compete with the Xbox or PS3 in terms of raw computing power.
Processor speed has nothing to do with game quality. If you were arguing for graphic/rendering superiority you may have a point, but the gaming landscape is littered with "pretty" games that play like shit.
Also take into account the fact that it is much cheaper and aimed at the less serious gamer and you can imagine that it becomes quite an appealing impulse buy that then has to rely on making the most out of the interactive controller element - or else!
I'm not that old but it wasn't too long ago that an expensive system was considered $150.00, so $250.00 is nothing to sneer at. And I'd hardly call those of us who've religiously played all of the core Mario/Zelda/Metroid/Castlevania (hey Thillian) franchises up through their various current iterations "casual gamers".
It has the back catalogue of previous generation gaming consoles - emulator style - for example. Neat feature, but one that probably enhances the sales figures even more, as well as its drastically cheaper price.
Yes, the Wii has VC/Mii/WiiWare. And the PS3 has PSOne games/DLC/etc. And the 360 has XBOX originals/XBLA/episodic content. Do you really see a difference between the offerings? You can buy friggin' Pacman on XBLA fer chrissakes! This kind of willful omission really stymies any discussion about consoles. Lets put it all out on the table people.
I would like to dispute some of the notions put forward in this thread:
The Wii is called a fad console because it cannot compete with the Xbox or PS3 in terms of raw computing power.
Processor speed has nothing to do with game quality. If you were arguing for graphic/rendering superiority you may have a point, but the gaming landscape is littered with "pretty" games that play like shit.
Also take into account the fact that it is much cheaper and aimed at the less serious gamer and you can imagine that it becomes quite an appealing impulse buy that then has to rely on making the most out of the interactive controller element - or else!
I'm not that old but it wasn't too long ago that an expensive system was considered $150.00, so $250.00 is nothing to sneer at. And I'd hardly call those of us who've religiously played all of the core Mario/Zelda/Metroid/Castlevania (hey Thillian) franchises up through their various current iterations "casual gamers".
It has the back catalogue of previous generation gaming consoles - emulator style - for example. Neat feature, but one that probably enhances the sales figures even more, as well as its drastically cheaper price.
Yes, the Wii has VC/Mii/WiiWare. And the PS3 has PSOne games/DLC/etc. And the 360 has XBOX originals/XBLA/episodic content. Do you really see a difference between the offerings? You can buy friggin' Pacman on XBLA fer chrissakes! This kind of willful omission really stymies any discussion about consoles. Lets put it all out on the table people.

there new... creative crap sucks...
Xbox360 has the failure rate
Wii has the shitty controls
PS3 came out way too late
Xbox360 has the failure rate
Wii has the shitty controls
PS3 came out way too late

GA, you're not conveniently forgetting the Xbox360 had 1 year head start on this race, right? For the Wii to have pulled ahead of the 360 by 2 million units worldwide, with 12 less months of selling, sorry bro, that's not a 'fad'.
Deleted user

(hey Thillian)
Hey. Any chance Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft'll sign a treaty, you think?
Deleted user

I'm confident that the wii will not sell as many units over the next few years as the other two consoles. The fact that it is so cheap, selling so well because of the wiimote and marketed as just a bit of fun kind of actually does make it a fad.

The PS3 may possibly outsell the Wii in 2 years, but not the X360. Microsoft 'box of red ring death' only did good the first year, when it had no competition. Unless they drop its price to $150 and bundle it with a bunch of games.
And I dont know why anyone calls ANY of these systems 'cheap'. Even the Wii, at $280 (in Canada), add in a 2nd Wiimote and 2 titles, you're pushing $500 with taxes. Quit making it sound like its a $10 Hoola-Hoop, GA.
And I dont know why anyone calls ANY of these systems 'cheap'. Even the Wii, at $280 (in Canada), add in a 2nd Wiimote and 2 titles, you're pushing $500 with taxes. Quit making it sound like its a $10 Hoola-Hoop, GA.
Deleted user

Well it is pretty cheap. I paid more for my Mp3 player, which I think says volumes about the 7th Gen console wars.

Yes because Mp3 players are germane to a discussion about game consoles. What exactly does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Deleted user

Sorry, I didn't read your last post.
My point about the processing power of each machine is that the Wii is starting from a position where it already offers inferior graphics compared to its main competitors. As a casual gamer I think that this is going to mean that it has a shorter shelf-life than the other two consoles. I've played all three and when playing the Xbox and PS3 I was left impressed, but after playing Wii sports and Zelda I was just thinking 'is this it'? It was hilariously entertaining in a group, but on my own I wouldn't be all that interested. I'm going to assume that programmers are going to be able to do more with the respective processing power of the PS3 and Xbox in the future, whereas the Wii will find the chopping air formula wears a little thin.
Just because you're a hardcore gamer, doesn't mean the wii isn't aimed at the casual gamers as a priority. Look at the family orientated adverts, I don't even know if there has been a Wii advert aired in the UK without a father and son bonding over the console or a family coming together over their shiny new gadget. The marketing in shopping centres was almost exclusively aimed at the very young also. You could accusing them, therefore, or offering a console to people who don't know any better?
The argument about prices is irrelevant. The Wii on launch was much cheaper than the Xbox360 and the PS3. Which makes it an appealing impulse buy. I am not even against the wii as a console, I think it's great fun, but there's no reason to take it more seriously than what it is.
I just remember a time when a computer console was the most expensive piece of electronics I would ever own. I'm pretty frugal with my spending, but I wouldn't ever have anticipated paying more for a generic music-playing implement than a games console.
My point about the processing power of each machine is that the Wii is starting from a position where it already offers inferior graphics compared to its main competitors. As a casual gamer I think that this is going to mean that it has a shorter shelf-life than the other two consoles. I've played all three and when playing the Xbox and PS3 I was left impressed, but after playing Wii sports and Zelda I was just thinking 'is this it'? It was hilariously entertaining in a group, but on my own I wouldn't be all that interested. I'm going to assume that programmers are going to be able to do more with the respective processing power of the PS3 and Xbox in the future, whereas the Wii will find the chopping air formula wears a little thin.
Just because you're a hardcore gamer, doesn't mean the wii isn't aimed at the casual gamers as a priority. Look at the family orientated adverts, I don't even know if there has been a Wii advert aired in the UK without a father and son bonding over the console or a family coming together over their shiny new gadget. The marketing in shopping centres was almost exclusively aimed at the very young also. You could accusing them, therefore, or offering a console to people who don't know any better?
The argument about prices is irrelevant. The Wii on launch was much cheaper than the Xbox360 and the PS3. Which makes it an appealing impulse buy. I am not even against the wii as a console, I think it's great fun, but there's no reason to take it more seriously than what it is.
I just remember a time when a computer console was the most expensive piece of electronics I would ever own. I'm pretty frugal with my spending, but I wouldn't ever have anticipated paying more for a generic music-playing implement than a games console.

I'm not sure I understand you're argument. You say that the Wii is "a fad" yet make a case for how it has the broadest appeal of the 3 consoles. You decry the longevity of the console, and then cite its marketing to and popularity among casual gamers (ironically, a group you identify yourself with). You say that prices are irrelevant yet you compare the price of the console with the price of an mp3 player as some sort of ham-handed means of quality measurement.
Let me be up front, I like the Wii. I own the Wii. I DO NOT, by any means, believe the Wii to be "THE GREATEST CONSOLE EVAR". It has its flaws. As do all the other consoles. It is elitist to believe otherwise.
Let me be up front, I like the Wii. I own the Wii. I DO NOT, by any means, believe the Wii to be "THE GREATEST CONSOLE EVAR". It has its flaws. As do all the other consoles. It is elitist to believe otherwise.

GA falls into the 'hardcore gamer' category. Making him believe in the Wii is futile. I talk to all my friends, most of them parents in their 30s, and all they talk about is the Wii. You know, people that don't have time to play a game for hours just to learn it. But just because someone is a casual gamer doesnt mean it will collect dust and they'll only buy Wii Sports and Wii Play - which is what all hardcore gamers are assuming is happening, hence their false assumption the Wii is a 'fad'.
Deleted user

On the one hand, I'm thinking of reasons why the Wii has shipped so many units off of the shelves, which was a prior POINT (Not argument) that I was making with Prelude. The reasons would be it's marketing strategy, cheap cost and gimmicky control pad. He's clearly big on the Wii and thinks it's great because it has shipped so many units SO TAKE THAT HATERZZZ
Marketing and popularity have nothing to do with longevity surely? At the moment it's cool to hate on Sony, but the PS3 is going to be around for a long time. Yeah, the Wii has sold the most units, but will the people who picked up the wii still be interested in a year or two when it comes to buying games that are probably sequels of a tried and tested formula? I DON'T believe the wii is futile, I said I enjoyed playing it, I just think it's a console to have a bit of fun with now and again - but please continue to condescend me, prelude.
I'm sorry if you hate 'hardcore gamers' which I apparently am. I can tell you it took me a lot longer to try and play FIFA 08 on the Wii than it did on the PS3. My ASSUMPTION is that the shelf life of the console will not be as long as the PS3 and Xbox360 because game developers will not push any boundaries with their new releases. Look at the Playstation 2, even after the launch of the PS3, it came out with games such as Shadow of the Colossus and Okami - both brilliant games that were released six or seven years after the console was, I don't think Wii is going to be able to do the same.
Marketing and popularity have nothing to do with longevity surely? At the moment it's cool to hate on Sony, but the PS3 is going to be around for a long time. Yeah, the Wii has sold the most units, but will the people who picked up the wii still be interested in a year or two when it comes to buying games that are probably sequels of a tried and tested formula? I DON'T believe the wii is futile, I said I enjoyed playing it, I just think it's a console to have a bit of fun with now and again - but please continue to condescend me, prelude.
I'm sorry if you hate 'hardcore gamers' which I apparently am. I can tell you it took me a lot longer to try and play FIFA 08 on the Wii than it did on the PS3. My ASSUMPTION is that the shelf life of the console will not be as long as the PS3 and Xbox360 because game developers will not push any boundaries with their new releases. Look at the Playstation 2, even after the launch of the PS3, it came out with games such as Shadow of the Colossus and Okami - both brilliant games that were released six or seven years after the console was, I don't think Wii is going to be able to do the same.

I wanted the Wii before it came out. You know, back when everyone was saying Nintendo was dead and will be a non-player in the console war.
so take that. :)
so take that. :)
Deleted user

Why did you want it though?

Argument: A fact or statement put forth as proof or evidence; a reason.
Marketing and popularity have nothing to do with longevity surely?
They factor into sales, which (while they are not good indicators of quality) factors into a consoles shelf life. If a console doesn't sell, whats the point in manufacturing it? Sales. It is a business after all. I seem to remember the Gamecube lasting for quite a while.
Yeah, the Wii has sold the most units, but will the people who picked up the wii still be interested in a year or two when it comes to buying games that are probably sequels of a tried and tested formula?
Well, seeing as how has been the most sought after X-Mas gift the past 2 seasons running. I don't see why not. As for sequels. Well we all know that the PS3/XBox 360 would never cash in on sequels. Pardon me while I ask for a show of hands for those who will be buying the MGS4 PS3 Bundle, vs. the GTA4 PS3 bundle?
My ASSUMPTION is that the shelf life of the console will not be as long as the PS3 and Xbox360 because game developers will not push any boundaries with their new releases. Um, with the Wii's control setup and its (comparatively) less powerful processor, wouldn't developers have to push boundaries to make a good product on the Wii?
...games such as Shadow of the Colossus and Okami - both brilliant games that were released six or seven years after the console was, I don't think Wii is going to be able to do the same.
Minor quibble, but SOTC and Okami we're developed and released before the PS3 launched. I loved them both. And I'm sure I'll love Okami on the Wii just as much, if not more since it will be in widescreen, and will allow one to ACTUALLY draw the symbols, rather than roll around an analog stick. Nope. Not innovative, or immersive at all. :p
Marketing and popularity have nothing to do with longevity surely?
They factor into sales, which (while they are not good indicators of quality) factors into a consoles shelf life. If a console doesn't sell, whats the point in manufacturing it? Sales. It is a business after all. I seem to remember the Gamecube lasting for quite a while.
Yeah, the Wii has sold the most units, but will the people who picked up the wii still be interested in a year or two when it comes to buying games that are probably sequels of a tried and tested formula?
Well, seeing as how has been the most sought after X-Mas gift the past 2 seasons running. I don't see why not. As for sequels. Well we all know that the PS3/XBox 360 would never cash in on sequels. Pardon me while I ask for a show of hands for those who will be buying the MGS4 PS3 Bundle, vs. the GTA4 PS3 bundle?
My ASSUMPTION is that the shelf life of the console will not be as long as the PS3 and Xbox360 because game developers will not push any boundaries with their new releases. Um, with the Wii's control setup and its (comparatively) less powerful processor, wouldn't developers have to push boundaries to make a good product on the Wii?
...games such as Shadow of the Colossus and Okami - both brilliant games that were released six or seven years after the console was, I don't think Wii is going to be able to do the same.
Minor quibble, but SOTC and Okami we're developed and released before the PS3 launched. I loved them both. And I'm sure I'll love Okami on the Wii just as much, if not more since it will be in widescreen, and will allow one to ACTUALLY draw the symbols, rather than roll around an analog stick. Nope. Not innovative, or immersive at all. :p
Deleted user

The PSP is still kicking around despite abysmal sales figures against its competitors. The advertising campaigns for the PSP were pretty controversial as well if I recall. A product will last as long as the company wishes to push it. Nobody takes it seriously as a handheld though, I think that the Wii will move in a similar direction in the next few years.
I think the Wii sells so much at christmas because it's the cheapest console, it's marketed at a younger generation and it is actually available on the shelves! (And round and round and round...) I also think there is a difference between a series that has been developed over a number of console generations compared to a sequel that is just a few more sports games thrown into a game that is shipped with a new console.
No, I don't think so. If there are inherent restrictions on how you can make a game, you're always going to finish off with a product that didn't quite reach its potential. It's more a case of moulding the game around the interactive element than the wiimote around the game.
Okami will do well on the Wii, when I first played it that is exactly what I thought, but it isn't innovative if it has already been released on a console 2 years ago!
I think the Wii sells so much at christmas because it's the cheapest console, it's marketed at a younger generation and it is actually available on the shelves! (And round and round and round...) I also think there is a difference between a series that has been developed over a number of console generations compared to a sequel that is just a few more sports games thrown into a game that is shipped with a new console.
No, I don't think so. If there are inherent restrictions on how you can make a game, you're always going to finish off with a product that didn't quite reach its potential. It's more a case of moulding the game around the interactive element than the wiimote around the game.
Okami will do well on the Wii, when I first played it that is exactly what I thought, but it isn't innovative if it has already been released on a console 2 years ago!
Deleted user

In relation to Okami, how many people are likely to buy it AGAIN for a new console just because you can the same things a different way? Sounds a bit odd to me.

well it has a lot of things but i find xbox live intresting.
This message has been deleted. Reason: duplicate

In relation to Okami, how many people are likely to buy it AGAIN for a new console just because you can the same things a different way? Sounds a bit odd to me.
Ask EA.
Ask EA.

About Okami: well, point is awefully little people have played the game to begin with. I won't be buying it again (unless as a bargain in a few years) but I can def. see potential for Capcom to sell this thing.
And you can't argue a console that has both Twilight Princess AND Okami. I mean, those two games complement each other so well ;)
And you can't argue a console that has both Twilight Princess AND Okami. I mean, those two games complement each other so well ;)
This message has been deleted. Reason: spam