Why moderators are so rude?

Hi!
Today I got the warning message:
"This is your last warning; if you keep reporting Victoria's Secret or other photoshoot pictures you'll be banned from using the whole site, not just from posting images. Catalog/photoshoot/editorials pictures are ALL allowed even if you can't see the model's face. As long as it's 100% who the model is, the picture can be posted."

In the message which I got 5 months ago after some of the pictures I posted had been deleted there was as well "Finally, do not post candid pictures that do not show the person's face."

So, I just reported some pictures which didn't show person's face and the moderator is threatening me with the ban.

Depends on the picture that was deleted 5 months ago was it a picture of a model that you posted or was it of just a celebrity/actor that you posted

..."Finally, do not post candid pictures that do not show the person's face."

So, I just reported some pictures which didn't show person's face...

I see a difference, though.

Candid pictures with no face = not posed, possibly anonymous subject

Victoria's Secret pictures = usually posed, identifiable model.

^ That's right.


You have also received this warning message in which a moderator explained to you what candid pictures mean:

"Candid pictures are pictures from events such as movie premieres or fundraisers, or paparazzi pictures. Stop reporting photoshoot pictures or catalog pictures as candids."

And you have been threatened with a (temporary) site ban because you kept reporting lots of pictures for non-valid reasons (catalog pictures as candids/no face, scanned editorials and their digital versions as duplicates - all allowed) despite receiving two warnings about it.