Spell Check
Deleted user

Would it be possible to install a spell check on reviews/posts/comments etc? Browsers come equipped with them i know, eg mine tells me when i am spelling things wrong (although of course even spell checkers are not always reliable) but it must be a relatively easy thing to work with?
That or can i suggest that more people download Firefox??
That or can i suggest that more people download Firefox??

I dont know why people out there don't use the fox. Besides the built-in spell checking, there's so many other handy add-ons that I personally couldn't live without.

Because people
- prefer another browser
- don't have the knowledge to download/install it
- aren't aware of alternatives to Safari or Internet Explorer
and probably most importantly
- often don't have a choice. Many work/school computers are locked down and enforce a particular browser (in our case at work, IE6).
- prefer another browser
- don't have the knowledge to download/install it
- aren't aware of alternatives to Safari or Internet Explorer
and probably most importantly
- often don't have a choice. Many work/school computers are locked down and enforce a particular browser (in our case at work, IE6).
Deleted user

But if you cant/wont use fire fox, AT LEAST HAVE THE IQ TO TYPE THOROUGHLY AND ACCURATELY!
Deleted user

I often makes mistakes typing because I go too fast or miss them when I reread. It has nothing to do with IQ.
Deleted user

But a spell checker would do that for you, i am not saying i am Mr spell perfectly, im not at all! Its not even anyone in particulars reviews, its just sometimes i go on a review and i wind up correcting all the spelling mistakes instead of focusing on the review, thats what made me post this. If you are typing fast, then a browser with a spell check would be beneficial to you right?
Deleted user

might be?
Should be very useful to some people.
Should be very useful to some people.
Deleted user

If you are typing fast, then a browser with a spell check would be beneficial to you right?
Not when the word is spelled correctly itself but is in fact the incorrect word... (like in cases of homophones: there, their, they're)
Deleted user

But wouldn't you have learnt which should be used in each situation?
Their is possesive,there is directional and they're is well reffering to people.
Their is possesive,there is directional and they're is well reffering to people.
Deleted user

That's not the point. You can know the meaning of the words and still slip when writing/typing too quickly. Same as people often using "your" instead of "you're"
And "they're" is not "reffering to people"... It's a contraction of "they are"
And "they're" is not "reffering to people"... It's a contraction of "they are"
Deleted user

True hence the "'" in "They're"
But that aside yes I have slipped up a few times while writing too fast I usually go back over it but I don't check it closely.
But I agree with rb6k it would make my life a little easier but I don't like the fox too much seeing as it keeps correcting me when I'm writing in french or welsh which doesn't help.
But that aside yes I have slipped up a few times while writing too fast I usually go back over it but I don't check it closely.
But I agree with rb6k it would make my life a little easier but I don't like the fox too much seeing as it keeps correcting me when I'm writing in french or welsh which doesn't help.

Personally, I don't use Firefox, I probably never will. Yes, it has a lot of great features that IE doesn't have, but I prefer the familiarity and simplicity of explorer, especially version 6, since version 7 spent a lot of effort to look more like firefox. However, regardless of browser preference, a spell checker is a handy tool. I like to think my spelling and grammar is pretty good, but from time to time I'm going to miss something that the spell checker will catch. If you don't have firefox, there are a few add-on options out there which work pretty well. I use ieSpell. It's not phenomenal, but it does work in a pinch, and it has multiple language settings, including Canadian standard English, which means I can spell colour with a 'u' and not have it changed back on me.

Rank: 209, Thanks for the ieSpell info. I am dyslexic and regardless of the IQ I transpose and my brain reads it correctly. I just downloaded ieSpell and it is so easy. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I shy away from things that do not have spell check because of how challenging it is to catch spelling errors. This Rocks!
Deleted user

Nice work Vanious

Why the histrionics over spelling, hm? So long as the meaning's clear, and it isn't a chore to read, who gives a ****? And if you think someone has a low IQ because of a few spelling mistakes, how about someone who doesn't always know when to capitalise, or seems to have not heard of apostrophes? You sound pompous and dimwitted.
Deleted user

The meaning is not clear in a lot of the reviews posted by younger users, and it usually is a chore to read. Hence this thread!
*Edited due to slight over reaction on my part which was un-called for*
*Edited due to slight over reaction on my part which was un-called for*

Right, I see. To be honest, if the kids' reviews are difficult to read, the best thing you can do is to simply not read the ones by users you know you won't easily decipher. I know that user reviews are a popular feature here, and I have despaired at the state of some myself, but what can you do? Besides, something to remember is that reviews won't always be written with a wider audience in mind, but could be targeted at the user's own peer group. I suggest this is, perhaps, often the case with the kids (especially the younger ones), whether they consciously realise it or not. Whilst it may be a drag for you or I to read, I don't doubt that most kids can probably understand each others' writings with little bother, for the most part. Frustrating, if they've reviewed something of interest, I know, but there you go.
Deleted user

A fair reply, but it would still be beneficial to the site to have a spell check facility. If somebody repeatedly misspells the same word it can teach them the correct spelling. Whilst that isn't what Listal is for of course, it can't be difficult to implement.
My comments above about IQ were quite poor, but proof reading a review for spelling errors doesn't take long. I am not claiming to be anywhere near perfect but when i created this thread two weeks ago it was after reading several low quality reviews (again, i am not saying mine are "high quality") some were by younger members of course, but some weren't. It wasn't mistakes like their instead of there, or loose instead of lose, it was becos instead of because and other disgraceful errors.
My comments above about IQ were quite poor, but proof reading a review for spelling errors doesn't take long. I am not claiming to be anywhere near perfect but when i created this thread two weeks ago it was after reading several low quality reviews (again, i am not saying mine are "high quality") some were by younger members of course, but some weren't. It wasn't mistakes like their instead of there, or loose instead of lose, it was becos instead of because and other disgraceful errors.

I'm still not convinced of any great need for one, and suspect it would simply be ignored by many of the people you probably think would benefit from it, if there was one. Don't get me wrong, I think it would be useful, and I'm not opposed to the idea - I just feel rather ambivalent about it.

well, the statement about IQ is really not appropriate, as you shouldn't forget that correct spelling isn't about IQ in general, and especially not if you consider that many of Listal's users native language is not english.
beside that i'd appreciate an integrated spell check, even more so if there was a possibility of a thesaurus (which might be difficult to implement, i'm aware of that).
beside that i'd appreciate an integrated spell check, even more so if there was a possibility of a thesaurus (which might be difficult to implement, i'm aware of that).
Deleted user

nd suspect it would simply be ignored by many of the people you probably think would benefit from it
I think that's really the crux of the matter: just because it's there, doesn't mean people will use it.
So, I'm neither for or against the idea of implementing it... but I do feel that for the majority of cases it will make no difference at all. I am one of those people who often makes the type of errors mentioned above and I never waste my time using a spellchecker. People don't generally have any trouble understanding me.
Deleted user

Threads like this are definitely not aimed at users like you though Voxy, you wouldn't be a Mod if you were incapable of writing coherently. Its likely just me, but if im typing and i see a red line under one of my words i have to rectify it straight away or it bothers me.
Most of the people talking in here, saying it will make little difference, or wont work, can already spell.
Most of the people talking in here, saying it will make little difference, or wont work, can already spell.