Roman Empire
Deleted user

((this thread is for Roman Empire Discussion only. there will be no spamming. Discuss ONLY the Roman Empire.))
the Romans conquered, ruled for a while, then were defeated. for cool information on the Roman Empire, and a cool quiz where you can find out which emporer you are, go to
www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire
to get to the quiz, scroll to the bottom and click on emperors. then look to the right side pannel bar thing, and it will say
Emperor quiz.
any questions about this just ask me.
the Romans conquered, ruled for a while, then were defeated. for cool information on the Roman Empire, and a cool quiz where you can find out which emporer you are, go to
www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire
to get to the quiz, scroll to the bottom and click on emperors. then look to the right side pannel bar thing, and it will say
Emperor quiz.
any questions about this just ask me.
Deleted user

sorry ashley but I have no questions about the romans
Deleted user

i meant any questions about the site.
Deleted user

nope
Deleted user

then stop posting, unless you have something you want to discuss.

This is a pointless thread. So we are not even allowed to talk about the Roman Empire, instead we have to talk about some crummy quiz?
Heresy!
Heresy!

the roman empires legion were th ebest
Deleted user

no this is so we can discuss the roman empire. -_- dont make me feel like it was a mistake to make a thread.

hehe but also kinda to do with the roman empire is the spartans now they were the best warriors of all time
Deleted user

the Spartans...didnt they conquer the Romans...?

no the anglo saxons and others conquered the romans
Deleted user

oh ok =^^=''

yeh
Deleted user

Romans suck the english men the scotsman and us welsh forced them back across the sea to their shitty hidey hole ^^ lol jk about the shitty hidey hole but then they did conquer us but they had the perfect law pattern

Kids I can tell you anything you want to know about the Roman Empire: I am particularly obsessed.
www.listal.com/list/ancient-texts
May I draw your attention to my background research on the area...are you writing something for history?
Favourite Emperor: Gaias Caligula
Favourite Historian: Suetonius
Favourite Battles: Julius Caeser's defeat of King Mithradetes of the Greeks. Claudius' defeat of the Britons.
This all sounds pretentious so I'm going to end with a generic smiley face to soften your young heart :)
www.listal.com/list/ancient-texts
May I draw your attention to my background research on the area...are you writing something for history?
Favourite Emperor: Gaias Caligula
Favourite Historian: Suetonius
Favourite Battles: Julius Caeser's defeat of King Mithradetes of the Greeks. Claudius' defeat of the Britons.
This all sounds pretentious so I'm going to end with a generic smiley face to soften your young heart :)
Deleted user

i wrote a report on Claudius for school...it needs edited a little..so bear with me.
Claudius
(10B.C. to 54A.D)
reigned (41A.D. to 54A.D.)
Claudius, disfigured by a serious illness, was clumsy and akward as a child. He was a very unlikely emperor, the only surviving heir of Agustus, and the brother of the war hero Germanicus. He became Emperor after Caligula's murder in 41A.D. He worked hard, and was fairly successful. He had one flaw: his poor taste in women.
Claudius improved Rome's judicial system in many ways. He passed laws protecting sick slaves, extended citizenship, and increased women's rights. He also treated his people with respect.
After his first promiscuis wife, Messalina, was proclaimed dead, he married his cousin Aggripina. She persuaded Claudius to disinherit his own son, Britannicus, and make her son, Nero, the heir. Now only Claudius stood in the way. She had a servant feed him poisoned mushrooms, but to her surprise, he began to recover.
She then hired his doctor to her own needs, and when he was pretending to help Claudius vomit his food, he stuck a poisoned feather down his throat.
Thus ended the reign of whom I think was one of Rome's greatest emperors. Nero's reign had begun. Who knows what will happen.
Claudius
(10B.C. to 54A.D)
reigned (41A.D. to 54A.D.)
Claudius, disfigured by a serious illness, was clumsy and akward as a child. He was a very unlikely emperor, the only surviving heir of Agustus, and the brother of the war hero Germanicus. He became Emperor after Caligula's murder in 41A.D. He worked hard, and was fairly successful. He had one flaw: his poor taste in women.
Claudius improved Rome's judicial system in many ways. He passed laws protecting sick slaves, extended citizenship, and increased women's rights. He also treated his people with respect.
After his first promiscuis wife, Messalina, was proclaimed dead, he married his cousin Aggripina. She persuaded Claudius to disinherit his own son, Britannicus, and make her son, Nero, the heir. Now only Claudius stood in the way. She had a servant feed him poisoned mushrooms, but to her surprise, he began to recover.
She then hired his doctor to her own needs, and when he was pretending to help Claudius vomit his food, he stuck a poisoned feather down his throat.
Thus ended the reign of whom I think was one of Rome's greatest emperors. Nero's reign had begun. Who knows what will happen.

Thats very very good; but bare in mind that Robert Graves who wrote 'I,Claudius' borrowed mostly from Suetonius' diary of Claudius and '12 Caesers'. Many have criticised both for being too bias/nice about him. Some other historians and definately the senate at the time thought of him as a tyrant. (although I prefer Suetonius' version of events').
His real name was Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus or Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero Germanicus (before he became Emperor)...and Nero was an abominable Emporer.
His real name was Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus or Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero Germanicus (before he became Emperor)...and Nero was an abominable Emporer.

Oh and the disease he had, has been pretty much narrowed down as either 'Polio and Infantile Paralysis' or 'Cerabal Palsey'.
And Claudius disinherited his son because he wanted to restore the republic and knew Britannicus would be too good an emperor. He believed a fortune told to Livia; that the next person to rule after him would bring Rome to its knees and restore a republican government;at which point Britannicus could return home (from hiding with the Britons) and become consul.
And Claudius disinherited his son because he wanted to restore the republic and knew Britannicus would be too good an emperor. He believed a fortune told to Livia; that the next person to rule after him would bring Rome to its knees and restore a republican government;at which point Britannicus could return home (from hiding with the Britons) and become consul.
Deleted user

yea i told you it needed edited lol =^^=''

Oh thats all just buff; if I could write like that at your age I would have been over the moon. I still write and re-write my essays 2 or 3 times before I give them in! Just thought I'd give you some extra stuff to bung in if you wanted to.
Deleted user

im a very good author actually =^^= i write fanfics and im working on my own book series
Deleted user

Robert Graves who wrote 'I,Claudius'...
I really dug the TV series, especially John Hurt as Caligula. Watched the whole thing in two sittings. So how does the book compare with the series? Any good?

The book is phenomenal, it doesn deviate too much from the series (which I also loved), but obviously goes into more detail. The series is actually an adpatation of 2 of Grave's books. 'I, Claudius' (everything up to his succession) and 'Claudius the God' (everything after, Messalina, Apgripina and his death).
www.listal.com/viewentry/94204
This is my review of the first book. You're a smart man so I'd definately recommend it.
John Hurt's Caligula is probably one of my all time favourite character/actor portrayals. Such a prima donna.
www.listal.com/viewentry/94204
This is my review of the first book. You're a smart man so I'd definately recommend it.
John Hurt's Caligula is probably one of my all time favourite character/actor portrayals. Such a prima donna.
Deleted user

Kinda off-topic, not really since it's techinally still the "Roman Empire," but lately I've been engrossed in Byzantine history largely due to this amasing podcast
www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/
Sure the Roman empire is epic but Byzantine history but hey, even when Rome itself fell the empire continued.
Speaking of Caligula, I've been meaning to watch the film of the same name but since you guys are mentioning a tv show I've been wondering if I should just watch that instead of seeing the supposedly epicly sucky movie?
www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/
Sure the Roman empire is epic but Byzantine history but hey, even when Rome itself fell the empire continued.
Speaking of Caligula, I've been meaning to watch the film of the same name but since you guys are mentioning a tv show I've been wondering if I should just watch that instead of seeing the supposedly epicly sucky movie?
Deleted user

What I don't like about the Romans is how obsessed they were with colonization. Can anyone confirm the ratio of Greek to Roman tutors in Roman society? For people that thought they knew enough to govern themselves, they certainly recruited a lot of Greek educators.
Deleted user

What I don't like about the Romans is how obsessed they were with colonization.That's just a recurring theme throughout history and not just restricted to the Romans.
Eh, apparently the Romans realised it'd be better to outsource...
Deleted user

That's just a recurring theme throughout history and not just restricted to the Romans.
Eh, apparently the Romans realised it'd be better to outsource...
My blame extends to all colonization. Far and wide, over the hills and valleys and through the trunks of trees, after which they fall down and, uh... Become the British empire.
This is a pointless thread. So we are not even allowed to talk about the Roman Empire, instead we have to talk about some crummy quiz?
Heresy!
You need to include a disclaimer in your posts. I'm thinking "Statements in post are friendlier than they appear" will work, or maybe "Do not blockquote if beyond sensibility trait".
Deleted user

Speaking of Caligula, I've been meaning to watch the film of the same name but since you guys are mentioning a tv show I've been wondering if I should just watch that instead of seeing the supposedly epicly sucky movie?
I highly recommend it. One thing you gotta know, it doesn't have a big glossy epic production, it doesn't look like Rome or Gladiator or anything. Pretty low key BBC TV production. But the thing just totally sucks you in. I watched the whole 11 hour series + documentary in just two days. It might look a bit stuffy, but I promise it isn't. Great acting, great drama and lots of soap-operatic plot twists. Anyway I see Gem has uploaded some clips and pictures so check it out:
www.listal.com/tv/i-claudius-1976
*edit* off-topic Windows Vista comment removed to avoid derailing topic

Unfortunately all these TV adaptations are inherently - adaptation, that is - distorted compared to original scripts. My advice is simple: take Latin classes, in a year or so you should be able to read easier texts and another year and you should be able to grasp the most complex structures as well. :) Besides being able to read ancient scripts it (Latin) also helped and continues to help me to learn other languages (I'm currently battling Spanish).

watching TV shows about Roman Empire vs learning a dead language. hmmm.. tough call.
Deleted user

The 'learning a dead language' option is proving to be a pretty satisfying choice for me. My goal is to one day read the left side of a set of pages in a Loeb Classical Library volume. This shouldn't be the slightest bit difficult if I can grasp the fact that there are over two dozen ways of writing each word depending on its placement.
Deleted user

Sorry I'm an ignorant American, I can't be bothered to learn ded languages.... or any other languages for that matter. If I wanted to read all my favorite novels as they were written I'd fear I'd become insane.
The other night I went to watch some Gregorian chanting and it was then that I resolved that I would not learn ded languages any time in the near future. But I probably will find myself learning it sometime soon just to feed my elitist nature.
The other night I went to watch some Gregorian chanting and it was then that I resolved that I would not learn ded languages any time in the near future. But I probably will find myself learning it sometime soon just to feed my elitist nature.
Deleted user

No one has to learn Latin if they don't want to, but if you're interested don't be turned off by its label as a "dead language" (quote-unquote).
Deleted user

I refuse to believe Latin is dead! :( I figure you have to have some kind of working knowledge of it... it's often referenced in movies and everyday life.

o plz don't go into the whole "It is technacly used in everyday conversation becasue it was the base of all languages." plz don't to that
Deleted user

o plz don't go into the whole "It is technacly used in everyday conversation becasue it was the base of all languages." plz don't to that
It's not the base of every language, but it's a definite root.