List width (RESOLVED)

Why has the width been increased? Surely to safeguard old lists it should have been left the same, is there any reason why it has been increased from 500 pixels?

Example of the problem:
www.listal.com/list/footsteps-of-jacqueline-bisset

We took the time to offer a nicer presentation for lists. Since the code used relies on left and right alignments, it would take an age to fix the damage caused by the update.

I will try and fix this for old lists.

That'd be great, the work involved in fixing so many lists doesn't need thinking about, they took long enough the first time.

Perhaps you could simply add an option for 'classic', I don't mind going through everything selecting an option for all if one is made available.

Great job on the site by the way, teething troubles are to be expected :)

Since there are so many other issues for you to deal with, and that this is probably an issue that only bothers us... I'll try a little bit of trickery to knock our lists back into shape. It will take a while but not as long as completely recoding all of our lists, so it's kind of a compromise :)

Edit:
Tada... www.listal.com/list/footsteps-of-leelee-sobieski... one fixed... just had to add a blank buffer image to force it all in by the 38 pixels that you've added. I'm sure I'll have to think of other ways for some of the lists that were coded differently, but it saves you having to change something just for two people.