LoginIrritating things on this site
Sveta
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 22 14:51 - What irritates me on this site is people who rate low on people just because they don't look beautiful, I thought you were suppose to rate them on talent..well it appears not.
ฦdita
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 22 15:53 - Well now for me it's those damn spammers and of course those bloody Disney Princess lists, which in my opinion is spam.
This message has been deleted.
Mackenzi
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 22 23:19 - When there's a combo tv/movie list but it only lists the movies under how many you've seen on the side.
Deleted user
Deleted
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 23 0:49 - Yeah, seriously, screw those Disney Princesses lists. It's as if this whole site is bein overrun with prepubescent girls.
Deleted user
Deleted
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 23 0:49 - Also, you can't type greater than or less than signs
This message has been deleted.
Deleted user
Deleted
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 23 16:27 - The Disney Princess lists.
Deleted user
Deleted
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 23 16:56 - chuck norris has a low rating. :(
shini
11 years, 4 months ago at Dec 24 14:01 - People who rate before they watch/listen/read. The fact that listal allows rating movies that don't even have a trailer yet.
Can't add mobile games.
Can't add mobile games.
Moderator
The O.P.
11 years, 3 months ago at Jan 10 12:25 - Shouldn't this thread belong with the Listal Feedback board? :)
Beefheart
11 years, 3 months ago at Jan 17 7:13 - the huge amount of material that exists for pornographic actresses and the low or none to real actors that have really contributed for cinema history
Deleted user
Deleted
11 years, 3 months ago at Jan 20 15:53 - Rating people is always difficult, but yuo should go on the talent of the person and not looks or other attributes they may or may not have
shini
11 years, 3 months ago at Jan 20 20:16 - I like the fact that this ^ post came after the previous one. It reads like "pornographic actresses shouldn't be rated according to their attributes". It'd be an epic statement.
I agree that the focus on porn, models, chicks from erotic/fetish sites and some such is kinda weird. I'm especially baffled by profiles that list absolutely nothing under TV and movies (chicks from sites, I presume). I don't really see the point of adding someone like that on the site. The only way to reach these profiles seems to be searching for the name, and then why not just google it?
I agree that the focus on porn, models, chicks from erotic/fetish sites and some such is kinda weird. I'm especially baffled by profiles that list absolutely nothing under TV and movies (chicks from sites, I presume). I don't really see the point of adding someone like that on the site. The only way to reach these profiles seems to be searching for the name, and then why not just google it?