double standards here ?

I'm new here.

Yesterday I had 6 pictures deleted for 'nudity or sexual'.

None of them was nude. As for sexual, every lingerie picture is some how sexual, but I could show in Listal hundreds of pictures more 'sexual'. So what ?

Not just odd : unfair. Very disappointing.

Can anybody hear the tiny violin? Probably somebody having a fiddle over their uploads.

First off, just because you see worse stuff around does not mean it's allowed; it means the moderators haven't gotten to it yet. Secondly, adult and glamor models will always be deleted if they're in sexually suggestive poses as most of yours were.

However, that Agent Provocateur picture:
www.listal.com/viewimage/5271926
Would have been left if it wasn't for having see through lingerie. Catalog and commercial models just modeling a product are allowed if all the naughty bits are covered, because the nature of them is less pornograohic and provocative.

www.listal.com/viewimage/5271953
And this Nelly picture... actually should have been left alone. You can repost this one if you like. The mod who deleted it probably just didn't realize where the picture was from and thought it was of a glamor model or something. But as I said, catalog pictures are generally allowed since they're less explicit.

So I apologize for that last one, but the rest were mostly deleted for suggestive poses. Clothes or not, we'll take anything that looks too sexual or that has a tag on it leading to an adult site (that last bit was just for future reference since it wasn't your problem in this case).

*edit* never mind.... Maggie is to fast for me ;)

I do not share you view, but thank you for your quick and long answer.

About the first image for example, it is so lovely it's just impossible to understand you describe it as 'worse stuff'.

I deduce with regret that this site is not for me.

So, who's fake account are you?

Nice Try