About errata wiki group

Some books have errata web pages, but some not. I have a idea that we can build a wiki for errata pages. One wiki page for one book. If that book already have a offical errata web page, just give a redirect link. If not, we make our own. Since it's based on wiki, everyone can edit. You can share mistakes you found and make use of errata posted by others.

If you are interested, please join this group. I am planing to build this errata wiki on wikia.com (provided by the same company who host wikipedia). In fact, I have sent an application to wikia.com. By joining this group, you can help this application get approved.

Application page on wikia: [Link removed - login to see]

If you have any questions or suggests, please post a new thread or just reply to this thread. Thanks in advance.

@ike Just a "M" and a "w".

news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

"In the end, the journal found just eight serious errors, such as general misunderstandings of vital concepts, in the articles. Of those, four came from each site. They did, however, discover a series of factual errors, omissions or misleading statements. All told, Wikipedia had 162 such problems, while Britannica had 123.

That averages out to 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica and 3.86 for Wikipedia."

I hate when people bag on Wikipedia.

No reply from wikia. So I changed to wikispaces.

Already set up: [Link removed - login to see]