Home > View image

Ability to get in contact with moderators when your picture gets deleted. You can send a protest if you don't agree with it.

Added on Sep 21 23:55

vote

It seems that the mods don't check if the reported pics really break any rules. They just delete every reported pic. Therefore the deletion of a picture should never be a decision of only one mod.

As a matter of fact, we do check every reported image and every time we decide to delete a reported image, it's always various reasons for it. We are not bumbling baboons that just press buttons for fun.

I wouldn't have such a feeling, if there weren't pics deleted, that don't brake any rules. Last time a (female) mod deleted a reported pic for "nudity/sexual" though there was no nudity (no breasts, no butt, no sexual posing, only wet hair and partly wet clothes - but without a transparent effect). It was absolutly conform with the rules. Examples like this show me that the mods not always really check a reported pic or they decide very subjectively. There must be a possibility to disagree with a mod's decision (with an explanation why), so that another mod can recheck it. I also think that it's better when male mods decide about "nudity/sexual" conformity of a picture. Women tend to judge too hard in such cases.

After a quick look at your deleted pictures, I can say that most of them have been deleted for having tags that lead to adult sites. Which is why the image you mentioned got reported.

I did not add these tags. Why not simply deleting those tags? Do you delete pics of porn stars simply because they are porn stars? Even if there is no nudity in a picture (e.g. the last pic of Ava Blue)? And by the way I even don't know or see a possibility to add tags to pictures.