Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

An average movie

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 10 November 2021 01:47

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was starring Natalie Portman, I was really eager to check it out. To be honest, I think it was pretty obvious that it was only the 2nd directorial effort of Brady Corbet. Indeed, even though there were plenty of good ideas, half of it still didn’t work, I’m afraid. Still, I can’t remember the last time that Portman delivered such an intense performance. Seriously, it felt as if her character from Black Swan’ actually didn’t die and became some kind of unhinged pissed-off popstar. Eventually, she was so good that you almost wish they skipped the first part and only focused on her. It’s not that the first part was bad though. Indeed, it was really dark and intriguing but, in my opinion, these 2 parts, one focusing on when Celeste was a teenager and the other focusing on her when she was grown-up, didn’t really work well together. First of all, I have nothing against Raffey Cassidy, she was not bad at all but, to be honest, she didn’t look at all like a young Natalie Portman. The fact that she also played Celestes daughter didn’t help either to make her casting less bewildering. On the other hand, I have to admit that I was really floored by Stacy Martin. Indeed, in contrary to Celeste who ended up being played by 2 actresses who didnt look like each other at all, Martin had to play the same character as a teenager AND as a grown-up and it was rather amazing how convincing she was in both cases. Its too bad they didnt give her much to do after all. Another issue was that the pacing in the 2 parts didn’t match at all. Indeed, the first part was taking place over roughly 18 months while the second part was taking place during a single day. Of course, you could argue that it was a creative choice but, in my opinion, it made the whole thing terribly unbalanced. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Natalie Portman's work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Vox Lux review

Posted : 4 years ago on 10 April 2020 01:34

"Vox Lux" is a very interesting experience more than an interesting film. Not to insinuate I'm trashing it out the gate. On the contrary, I much admire its dedication to a style so divergent from the Hollywood standard that it beckoned me to continue watching even when you feel like I'd lost grasp of the film's intentions. Naturally, this approach is enough to alienate a large portion of any potential audience if they are not inclined to consume a structure that almost seems purposely pretentious at times and genuinely, intensely philosophical at others. The film truly manages to walk a tightrope that gives it both scale and scope and the feeling of an art house film. I wish I could say that it's a brilliant piece of work on either end but, though it keep me fascinated in its own special way, it remains more of a curious piece than an outright masterpiece.

The story follows the rise of a teenager named Celeste (played by Raffey Cassidy for the first half) who, in the wake of a school shooting, is cast into a spotlight and soon finds herself in a whirlwind of celebrity as she is groomed to become a pop star. Divided into several acts which give us a peek into different portions of her life (Celeste is played by Natalie Portman in the film's latter half), we begin to see the disastrous effect of celebrity on her innocence. As she was affected by tragedy, tragedy and the surrounding world begin to affect her life and art and, as the film progresses, they affect the world around her.

"Vox Lux" is a visually alluring picture. If you're a fan of cinema, the filmmaker's approach to this movie will grab you and not let go. From its lighting, to its aspect ratio, to its eclectic structure, to its use of a narrator the vague nature the film inherently hooks you in, dangerously skirting the precipice of feeling like an overt effort to stand out. Narratively, the film is something of an obtuse beast, at times seemingly dead set on defying expectations and at others leaning so hard into a concept that you begin to question its intentions.

In line with this, our main character is not a particularly likable one. This is yet another angle that can potentially drive away an audience. I've always been intrigued by stories that dare to challenge the viewer with a detestable protagonist and, admittedly, this was part of the fascination I had with the picture. Too boot, she lives in a world that is as ugly as she is. Given the idea that she is catalyzed by events and in turn affects others, this fits in perfectly with the tone but does not necessarily make for a comfortable viewing experience.

In short, "Vox Lux" is not for everyone. It is a very brazenly unfriendly film but for that reason it is a very fascinating film. What made it work for me, beyond the morbid interest in its defiant approach and its unique presentation, WAS how it unflinchingly it holds a mirror up to the flaws in its characters and the world they populate. The film finds its beauty in presentation but definitely not in its narrative building blocks and, shockingly, that feels very intentional. This makes for a dissonant but intriguing watch, if you're not immediately turned off by it.

"Vox Lux" is a somewhat enigmatic piece but it does eventually come together as a harsh character piece. Its cryptic finale suggests a far colder ambition in Celeste that makes you reevaluate all the moments in her life in a new light. Par the course of the film, this only makes her even more unlikable than you previously thought. Almost as if the movie's rebelliousness is punctuated by a character arc opposite that of the status quo.

Indeed, "Vox Lux" defies expectations constantly. Sometimes to its benefit and sometimes to the bafflement of the audience but it never lost my rapt attention. It is not a perfect film and it is most definitely not a film that many will take to. That being said, it is a film that can most definitely be called unique. If your interested in something that is completely against the grain, then it might be for you. Upon first viewing I give it a 7/10 but I have a feeling that will improve upon repeated viewings as it is most definitely a film that begs to be revisited.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Vox Lux review

Posted : 4 years, 9 months ago on 30 June 2019 04:04

More pretentious than it seems. Well, the documentary narration in off by Dafoe is heavy, but then everything is natural and softly disturbing, posing the big question on why Veleste attracts evil , answered in many ways...


0 comments, Reply to this entry