Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Year One review

Posted : 9 years, 10 months ago on 29 June 2014 02:24

Harold Ramis used to be king of the comedy, this movie certainly does not show it. There is some great improv with Black and Cera, but the one note comedy gets old half way through.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Year One review

Posted : 10 years, 8 months ago on 27 August 2013 03:51

Watched it, rejected it but still watched it. Year One is one of those unfunny comedies, which is common, when writers and actors are trying too hard to be hilarious. If your looking for a movie where no attention or emotional attachment is needed. You can read a book and listen to the sweet background actions of Zed and Oh, being superficial, stereotypical and polar opposites yet best friends(never been done before).


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 6 March 2011 07:56

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since Michael Cera and Jack Black can be both pretty hilarious. I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, Black and Cera were not bad and the beginning was actually promising with a few good jokes. But then, unfortunately, pretty fast, the whole thing got very lame, boring and above all rather unfunny... It’s too bad because this concept had some potential but, towards the end of this movie, I was just rather bored and even annoyed by this flick. I mean, from a decent concept, the whole thing turned out to be seriously lazy after all which was rather disappointing. Concerning Cera, I thought he was also pretty good in ‘Scott Pilgrim vs. the World’ which was released a year later but, since then, we don’t hear much from him anymore but you could say the same about Jack Black. Concerning Harold Ramis, who passed away just a couple of years ago, it would be his last directing effort which is rather sad. To conclude, even though I have seen worse, the whole thing was still pretty damned average and I don’t think it is worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Year One review

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 3 December 2010 10:23

Below Average movie, you can watch if you are really feeling bore and you don't have anything else to watch.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Year One

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 7 September 2010 02:23

This movie's title would suggest that there's at least a possibility that the filmmakers have a sequel in mind, depending (of course) on how many fans of Jack Black and Michael Cera flock to see it. While the prospect of a sequel to Year One isn't horrifying, it's nothing worth getting excited about either. The humor here is very much scattered and inconsistent; this is precisely the kind of movie that the fast-forward button was made for, which is why it's highly advisable to wait for the DVD on this one, rather than sitting through it in theaters. After watching Fired Up, Year One seemed like a potentially refreshing piece of amusement, and while it's certainly better, it still falls short of being good.

The fact that the film is set in the first year of human history is just an excuse to try to put an interesting spin on the plot, even though this doesn't really do much for the comedic value, since most of the laughs are found within the banter that our two main characters exchange. Unfortunately, these few amusing moments are lumped between some really terrible, unfunny dialogue and a set of uninspired and poorly choreographed action/fight sequences. Worst of all, though, there are three vomit-inducing instances in which the film resorts to toilet humor: the first goes miles further than it needs to and involves consumption of feces, the second involves flatulence in bed (how creative), and the third involves upside-down urination and is beyond disgusting. The saddest thing about this is that Cera is involved in all three moments, and he's forced to cringe his way through all three of these scenes. He's also the direct subject of the upside-down urination scene, and watching him embarrass himself like this, the only consolation is the knowledge that he has been (and hopefully will continue to be) in other, much better comedic projects. You also have to give him credit for continuing to employ his dweeb-ish comedic shtick so well, and it's mostly thanks to that that the film isn't without its scattered laughs. Jack Black is marginally less successful because, well, he doesn't act - he just gives a lot of wide-eyed stares and mugs for the camera as often as he gets the chance.

The word "primitive" is very fitting here, not just to describe the era and the characters in the film, but also to describe the quality of the comedy, which shows occasional potential, but is mostly amateurish, tired and uninventive.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Year One review

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 24 June 2010 02:48

I like juno temple。Ihope you can come to China.Welcome...


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Waste of Time & Talent

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 14 October 2009 12:59

"What transpires within the confines of the walls of Sodom, stays within the confines of the walls of Sodom."


Year One looked to be the comedy of the 2009 summer season. Judd Apatow (the King Midas of modern comedy) produced the film for his idol Harold Ramis (Groundhog Day, Caddyshack) who wrote the screenplay with the staff writers for the successful American version of The Office. The two leads of the movie are Jack Black and Michael Cera, who are supported by a bunch of able actors (including David Cross, Hank Azaria and Paul Rudd). It's a colossal shame, then, that Year One is an inexplicably unfunny, hit-and-miss comedy. It's not exactly an abject laugh famine, but with the film boasting such a large variety of comedic players behind and in front of the camera it wouldn't have been unreasonable to expect something far better than this.


The film introduces two cavemen protagonists: inept hunter Zed (Black) who has a tendency to annoy the tribe's more respected members, and equally inept, wimpy gatherer Oh (Cera). Neither of them have much luck with women - Maya (Raphael), the object of Zed's lust, perceives him as an unlikely provider, while Oh's would-be bedmate Eema (Temple) doesn't even know he exists. Zed gets fed up and bored with his life, and decides to eat forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. Since this is a violation of tribal law, Zed is banished from the primitive village, and Oh joins him as they set out to explore the ancient world.


Director Ramis and his pair of screenwriters employ material from the first book of the Bible in the form of a sketch-comedy akin to Mel Brooks' History of the World, Part I. In fact, Year One treats the Biblical book of "Genesis" not as a chronology of happenings but as a geographical road map instead. The Garden of Eden and Sodom are included, along with Cain, Abel, Abraham, Isaac and countless others - all separated by distance rather than time. The film isn't exactly a satire of Bible stories (it might've worked better had that been the objective) - it's instead a mismatched buddy movie which contains Biblical names and locations. This is not a necessarily bad idea, but laughs are crucial for a shallow comedy like this. It'd be remiss to say Year One never achieves chuckles, as it does occasionally, but these are a depressingly thin and disappointingly intermittent commodity. This could have been the new generation's Life of Brian, but that film had the advantage of a smart, inspired and hilarious screenplay written by the Monty Python troupe working at the pinnacle of their creative powers, and who were unafraid to push the boundaries in order to achieve comedic goals. Hindered by its PG-13 rating, Year One feels like the product of a group of writers having an off night with a paranoid studio executive supervising the process.


Year One plays it frustratingly safe. With little in the way of cutting Biblical humour or mockery of primitive cultures, the movie is crammed with gross-out humour, incest jokes and flat pop culture references. There's a brief scene featuring Bill Hader that fails so spectacularly that Hader himself is seen questiong the script during the end-credit outtakes. Year One might provoke belly laughs from 6 or 7-year-old kids who can't resist giggling at the image of someone farting or urinating on themselves, or someone munching on faecal matter, but what the film sorely lacks is ingenuity and wit. There's even a large orgy sequence which was probably designed to serve as the film's comedic centrepiece, but it's exasperatingly long without being funny or (thanks to the PG-13 rating) even sexy. Hell, the writers were even unable to come up with a single amusing Sodom joke; a task this reviewer could pull off over the course of a quick lunch break. Year One is a stillborn production that merely delivers 100 minutes of laugh-free scenarios.


Judd Apatow apparently has great affection for Harold Ramis, but allowing him to run wild with Year One was an ill-advised decision. The film's failure is almost entirely because of Ramis whose direction is clumsy and half-hearted, and whose sense of comic timing is slipshod. The story simply meanders along, awkwardly transitioning from one scene to the next. Ramis often cuts to the next skit before any real punchline; regularly generating the impression that huge chunks of the movie are missing. For instance, Oh is attacked by both a snake and a cougar early into the movie. But on both occasions, the film cuts to the next scene before we get to see how he gets out of it! Even the final scene ends with the characters just walking away. This is followed by an end-credit blooper reel full of flubs and on-set stuff-ups that allow an audience the opportunity to see just how little anyone cared about the production.


It's almost cruel to witness a procession of marvellous actors failing so miserably here. All these talented performers are unable to elevate the material beyond primary school depth. Furthermore, no-one in the cast pushes themselves beyond their established screen personas, with the respective shtick of Jack Black and Michael Cera - the bug-eyed, over-exuberant fat doofus and the mumbling, deadpan pork - growing tiresome very quickly. Black's comedic liveliness is usually only tolerable in small doses. With him receiving top billing and maximum screen time in Year One, he becomes grating. Cera, on the other hand, merely turns in the exact same performance we've seen him deliver in Superbad, Juno, and so on. The concept of pairing Black's bluster with Cera's reticence may have seemed foolproof in theory, but in practise the results are lethal.
Arguably, the only comedic highlight of Year One (if there is only one) is Hank Azaria's amusing interpretation of Abraham, though his screen-time is far too limited. The rest of the cast is awful, including Oliver Platt who hams it up and merely epitomises an abundance of gay jokes for his role. It would seem impossible to include a bad Paul Rudd cameo, but Harold Ramis is a can-do guy when it comes to pushing quality into the middle of the road - or, in this case, off the road and into a ditch!


Year One admittedly retains some energy, so it's tragic that this energy is squandered on a movie not really worth making. There are a few chuckles to be found here and there throughout the film, but they're so irregular that they only serve to highlight how the rest of it has utterly failed in that regard.

2.7/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry