Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

The Martian review

Posted : 8 years, 2 months ago on 22 February 2016 03:51

Good idea, the accidental colonization of mars by one guy, very realistic. Well narrated by the device of the various cameras Matt Damon talks with; but too long and tedious explaining the rescue.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Martian review

Posted : 8 years, 2 months ago on 22 February 2016 01:15

Excellent story told very well. Damon is in his element and I thought it a strong movie for the acting. There are a lot of logical leaps and a fair amount of predictability, but it's more than intriguing enough to sustain, not to mention some good suspense. Glad to see science such a central theme to the plot. Good stuff!


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Martian

Posted : 8 years, 3 months ago on 19 January 2016 01:12

The Martian is a finely made piece of popcorn entertainment, but thinking about it as anything beyond that is a folly. It’s technical skill cannot be faulted, but its central performance and direction are lacking.

 

It’s clearly not a problem of the script, which sticks smart dialog into various characters, and plays realistically enough with the science to feel incredibly real. Its various twists and turns are handled well from a story-telling perspective, and smartly casts various actors, both movie stars and character types, in various roles to flesh out what isn’t on the page. Yet again, the technique is smart; it’s the execution that’s the problem.

 

Ridley Scott’s direction is antiseptic and impersonal. Scenes of high-tension feel deflated from the razor’s edge. We already know that everything will work out, and it feels more routine and mundane in these sequences. Strangely enough, the scenes of highest interest are the ones in which our stranded astronaut must plan his survival and logically think his way through it all. Scott’s attention to detail and spark in these scenes is missing in many of the action sequences, which dive into beautiful images but lack feeling.

 

Perhaps it’s also that Scott’s pacing is off throughout The Martian. At a bloated two hours and twenty minutes, the pacing goes weird at several points. A sense of monotony takes hold during the middle section as our hero figures out a problem, everything is going smoothly, then we just know something has to gone wrong, then an explosion kicks in, and science is used to solve that problem. Repeat until the climax. It becomes mechanical and unthinking, looping through these sequences again and again and again.

 

Perhaps a change in leading man would have helped matters. Movie stars come with baggage, and sometimes they’re the only way a studio will gamble on a project. I understand the casting of Matt Damon, but I never believed it was anything other than Matt Damon dropping monologues to the audience, growing a beard, and losing a weight. We know Damon won’t die, because he’s Matt Damon, and he comes loaded with a baggage. It removes some of the survivalist interest and tension from the film, effectively taking the wind out its sails. Damon does fine movie star work, but we’ve seen him dig deeper and do better work in films like The Departed or Good Will Hunting.

 

But looking at the glossy exteriors, the lovely special effects work, the solid costume design, and appealing cinematography, The Martian is a gigantic beast. I sometimes wonder how modern films would play out as silent films, and perhaps The Martian would work wonders as a silent film. It’s a lovely series of highly detailed images drifting by. I applaud the film for placing the foundations of it story on science, engineering, logic, and problem-solving, but a little poetry, awe, and wonder would have gone a long way to making The Martian something better.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Martian review

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 2 January 2016 09:00

Matt Damon and Ridley Scott scienced the shit out of this movie! Awesome work!
If you liked Robert Zemeckis's Contact (1997) or Christopher Nolan's Interstellar (2014), you will like this too.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

In Space No-One Can Hear You .. At All

Posted : 8 years, 7 months ago on 6 October 2015 05:34

Going for a slow burn introduction before upping the action has been a technique used many times previously by Ridley Scott, but in The Martian he has chosen to hit the ground running by starting with the dramatic events which leave astronaut Mark Watney (Matt Damon) stranded, and apparently without hope of survival or rescue on Mars.  The opening of the film was very effective in immersing the audience in the situation and will doubtless please those who have dismissed the slower pace of previous Scott movies as boring.  As the story progresses the pace does fluctuate between kinetic action set pieces and more thoughtful, leisurely sequences.  The change in mood between sequences is handled very well.

At first The Martian is very much a variant on the Robinson Crusoe story, as was the memorable Cast Away.  Thanks to its setting, however, The Martian offers an interesting spin on the story of a stranded survivor, with Watney having to create ingenious solutions to the challenges of the Martian environment.  He explains what he is doing on recordings made to video-cameras, a device which is somewhat clumsy, but does work well.  It is difficult to see how the story would have worked without resorting to this dramatic licence.  Similarly, everyone in this movie reads out the content of their emails rather than merely typing them.  The depiction of life in a hostile environment is compelling but does not go on for too long as the story switches to looking at the efforts everyone is making back on earth to rescue Watney, once he has successfully contacted Mission Control to inform them that he is still alive.

At this point the film is very much in the territory of Apollo 13, as several rescue plans are examined and then ultimately improvised upon by the boffins at Nasa, Watney and his fellow astronauts.  It does become a little too feelgood at times, with the odd cheesy moment.  There is a nice sense of lightness of touch generally but occasionally this was a film which went too much for corniness.  I liked the fact that Watney was stuck with recordings consisting of disco records, a genre he hated, but it would have been enough for one to appear on the soundtrack once rather than several times.  Using David Bowie's Starman was a little too obvious as well.  Tonally, this resembles a Tony Scott movie rather than a Ridley one at times.

I was impressed by the ensemble cast.  Damon does especially well in the lead role, with the right mixture of stoicism, anxiety, intelligence and humour.  He was ably supported by the likes of Jeff Daniels, Sean Bean and Jessica Chastain.  The film never loses sight of the human aspects of the story and balanced this well with moments of scientific exposition.  I would have liked a few more references to Watney's relationships with his fellow astronauts, as this was somewhat sketchily drawn in the script.

Overall the Martian was a very enjoyable movie.  It looked spectacular (unsurprising for a Scott feature), was well paced, and makes for a compelling emotional journey you will be glad to have embarked upon.  I would have liked to seen the impact psychologically of the astronaut's isolation explored in greater depth but was otherwise rather impressed by the quality of the script.  With only minor flaws, The Martian is definitely worth your time.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A low-key blockbuster with smarts and humanity

Posted : 8 years, 7 months ago on 5 October 2015 03:41

"I'm gonna have to science the shit out of this."

In the hands of practically any other filmmaking team, 2015's The Martian would have been an insufferably tedious, self-serious science fiction flick shamelessly manufactured for Oscars. But with a spirited screenplay by Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods, World War Z) and with veteran director Ridley Scott at the helm, The Martian is an incredibly involving sci-fi drama endowed with a welcome sense of humanity. Based on Andy Weir's 2011 novel of the same name, this film is a godsend, a mix of Cast Away and Apollo 13 which positively comes alive in the hands of Mr. Scott. Smartly-written, technically proficient, emotionally gripping and highly entertaining, it's an unexpected late-year bright spot. There was a lot of anticipation leading up to The Martian's release, but considering Scott's recent track record, there was certainly some degree of apprehension mixed with the hope that the film would be a home run. Thankfully, it's a masterpiece.


Mark Watney (Matt Damon) is a botanist on a mission to Mars, working alongside an amiable crew consisting of Beth (Kate Mara), Chris (Sebastian Stan), Rick (Michael Peña), Alex (Aksel Hennie), and Commander Melissa Lewis (Jessica Chastain). When a violent storm hits and the team are forced to evacuate, Mark is hit by satellite debris and presumed dead, forcing Melissa to make the difficult decision to leave their fallen comrade behind. When the dust settles, Mark wakes up injured but alive, quickly realising that he's hopelessly alone and might need to wait up to four years to be rescued. Determined to stay alive, Mark begins strategising and rationing, and even begins to grow crops on the desolate planet to enhance his food supply. Back on Earth, NASA eventually discovers that Mark is alive, with Chief Teddy (Jeff Daniels) working with top minds to establish communication with Mark and bring their boy home.

The Martian is extraordinarily light on its feet, breezing through a brisk but effective opening segment concentrating on the storm, stranding Mark as quickly as possible in order for the film to get into its groove and focus on survival techniques. It's gripping to watch Mark employ his ingenuity to ensure his survival, with vignettes alternating between the playful and the sombre, and Scott handles the tonal changes with astonishing ease. Perhaps more depth and background to Mark's character would have been appreciated, but not a single frame of the film's 140-minute runtime goes to waste. The movie constantly shifts focus between Mark, NASA and Mark's crew, who are still on their way home, yet Scott juggles the numerous subplots masterfully, maintaining momentum and a skilful pace from start to end.


Perhaps the strongest aspect of Goddard's adapted screenplay is its playful sense of humour. Most movies these days adhere to the patented Christopher Nolan approach, i.e., dour drama with serious actors standing around and saying serious dialogue in a serious tone. Hell, a number of Scott's recent movies have even fallen victim to this (Prometheus, The Counselor, Exodus). Standing in stark contrast to this, The Martian is often very amusing, but the comedy is neither forced nor farcical; rather, the laughs emerge organically from the character interactions, heightening that all-important sense of humanity. And since the movie concerns itself with dense science that the average film-goer will struggle to comprehend, the playfulness keeps us interested.

Backed by a generous budget, The Martian is striking from a visual standpoint, with a mixture of sets, digital effects and location shooting to create the illusion of being on the surface of Mars. However, Scott's direction is also non-intrusive and honest, letting the dramatic potential of the plot speak for itself, even creating a few montage sequences (backed by terrific musical choices) to effectively convey the passage of time. The final act, meanwhile, is a masterclass of photorealistic special effects and tremendous suspense, showing that the 77-year-old director can still create nail-biting set-pieces. There are moments of theatricality scattered throughout – most noticeably towards the picture's dĂ©nouement – that stuffy critics may whinge about, but such moments work in this context. The Martian is a movie, after all, and the climax manages to be entertaining whilst simultaneously being intense and believable. It's a tricky balancing act, yet Scott pulls it off competently.


Damon deserves a lion's share of the credit for making the movie work. Especially throughout The Martian's opening act, large chunks amount to a one-man show, with Scott concentrating on Watney's day-to-day routine intercut with his constant video logs. But while Damon deserves Oscar consideration, the rest of the ensemble also contributes in a major way – there's not a dud performance in the bunch. Daniels emanates gravitas as the NASA chief, while the likes of Sean Bean and Kristen Wiig are unexpectedly brilliant in dramatic supporting roles as NASA employees. Bean, in particular, hasn't been so alive in years. Meanwhile, Oscar nominee Chiwetel Ejiofor (12 Years a Slave) positively lights up the screen with a charismatic performance as the Mars mission director. Digging further into the cast, Chastain is predictably great, while Kate Mara puts in solid work to help us forget about Fantastic Four. Also noteworthy is Donald Glover's small but pivotal role as someone who's key to bringing Mark home safely.

Armchair critics may be able to pick The Martian apart for scientific inaccuracies, but I am not a scientist. What matters is that this movie works on its own terms as a low-key blockbuster of sorts with intelligence, heart and personality, and it's not weighed down by pretensions or a sense of self-seriousness. 2015's Oscar season is officially off to a flying start, and The Martian is going to be a tough act to follow.

8.9/10


1 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 8 years, 7 months ago on 3 October 2015 10:56

After the disappointing 'Prometheus', the almost abysmal 'The Counselor' and the really underwhelming 'Exodus: Gods and Kings', I was starting to loose faith in Ridley Scott and I can’t say I was expecting much from this flick. I mean, sure, I'm glad that the guy, at almost 80 years old, is still incredibly productive but what's the point of releasing a new movie virtually every year if they are all going to be half-baked? Fortunately, this one managed to get a pretty good buzz before it was released so there was some hope. Eventually, I have to admit that it was indeed pretty good but, to be honest, it didn’t really manage to completely blow me away though. I mean, the whole thing looked really good, it was really entertaining and it was very nice that Scott tried to make a smart movie for once but it was still missing something in my opinion. I guess, at the end of the day, even though they tried really hard to convince us that it was really clever, I think it was still too shallow, like most of the movies directed by Scott. For example,  not so long ago, I saw 'All is lost', another movie about Robert Redford all alone trying to survive on a drifting boat and even though it wasn’t really great, I really had the feeling that the guy could die every 5 minutes and you could really feel the mental agony that the main character must have felt through his ordeal. Here,  even though Matt Damon did deliver a solid performance, I never felt that the main character's life was really at risk and the fact that he keeps cracking jokes all the time might have been fun to watch and easier to swallow but it also really diminished the psychological impact  of what he was actually going through. It is like adding all these other characters, it actually distracts us constantly from  how messed up his situation actually was. Still, for a popcorn movie, it was at least not dumb at all and I have to admit that the damned thing was actually seriously entertaining. Anyway, to conclude, even though I think it is actually overrated, it is still a really good flick though and one of the best made by Ridley Scott in the last 10 years.


1 comments, Reply to this entry