When I first heard about this movie, IĀ actuallyĀ had some mixed feelings. Indeed, it was dealing with a fascinating story and there was a stellar cast involved (Ryan Gosling, Christian Bale, Steve Carell, Brad Pitt, Marisa Tomei) but Adam McKay in the directing chair? I mean, so far, the guy had only directed some raunchy comedies starring Will Ferrell. Eventually, it turned out to be a critical hit and many thought it might even win the Academy Award for the Best Picture but it eventually lost against āSpotlightā. So, with all this in mind, I was quite eager to check the damned thing but, after all, it turned out to be a decent watch but I canāt say it really blew me away. First of all, Iām glad I saw before Ā āInside Jobā and āMargin Callā as it made it much easier for me to follow all these financial terms but, on the other hand, as a result, I had already saw 2 great movies about this subject and, in my opinion, this 3rd picture wasnāt really an improvement. Basically, the only thing they really did was adding a flashy directing style but even this was already done a few years back in āThe Wolf of Wall Streetā and, of course, McKay is no Scorsese. Finally, even though the 4 characters were quite interesting, we hardly spend enough time with any of them to really get have a connection with these guys. Still, pretty much like with āSpotlightā, even though I think it is rather overrated, it was still dealing with a spellbinding story, it was also quite entertaining and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā
The Big Short Reviews
A good movie
Posted : 7 years, 5 months ago on 23 November 2016 08:120 comments, Reply to this entry
The Big Short review
Posted : 7 years, 9 months ago on 8 July 2016 03:210 comments, Reply to this entry
The Big Short review
Posted : 8 years, 1 month ago on 2 March 2016 02:380 comments, Reply to this entry
The Big Short
Posted : 8 years, 3 months ago on 18 January 2016 09:17Something of a toothless The Wolf of Wall Street, The Big Short wants to play the 2007 ā 2008 financial crises as something a long-con heist film, but we already know how it works out. It also wants to be a satirical jab at the entire thing, but halfway through veers into serious dramaturgy. Thereās lots of energy, and a series of collaged images that stretch back through time to explain the society weāre living in that wrought these irresponsible capitalistic practices, yet one cannot shake the feeling that itās missing something.
Ā
Maybe itās that the film presents itself mostly as a series of disparate personality types stumbling onto something that was right in front of everyone all along. Steve Carrell is a socially awkward, aloof man with a negative percentile bullshit tolerance, and a desperate need to be right. Ryan Gosling reprises his role from Crazy, Stupid, Love, but plays it for maximum smarm and no heartfelt redemption arc. Christian Bale tries to give his character an inner life, but is undone by a series of quirks ā a glass eye, his characterās inability to socialize ā that provide most of the character development. Finn Wittrock and John Magaro as adorably naĆÆve and giddy boys trying to get a seat at the adultās table, with Brad Pittās neurotic acting as their guide and sage advisor.
Ā
Throw in random cameos from Margot Robbie in a bathtub, Anthony Bourdain in a kitchen, Selena Gomez and Richard Thaler playing blackjack, and have each of them explain complicated, labyrinthine banking procedures, and The Big Short seems more interested in creating a lot of noise and not a lot of substance. This shouldnāt be too surprising, as director Adam McKay films banking offices and sterile buildings with all the excitement and juice of an action film.
Ā
Numerous sequences feature lots of bells and whistles, at the expense of the dialog pouring out of the characterās mouths. Sometimes, being a good director is knowing when to keep the camera still and letting your actors delivery massive amounts of exposition with coherence. Randomly focusing in and out of the frame, our panning, cutting, splicing and dicing to the point of visual noise while complicated concepts are being explained is just poor decision making.
Ā
When the film stops spinning long enough to give us a quiet moment of contemplation or reflection, it stands out in marked contrast to everything whirling around it. Itās not that The Big Short is bad, because itās not. Itās enjoyable, but with subject matter this juicy, and a cast this loaded with talent, it is frustrating that it isnāt better. Somewhere along the way someone decided that they didnāt have faith in the material to stand on its own, or on the audience to synthesize the information dumps, so they included everything they could think of to thrown in. Look at the shining objects while we explain tough things!
Ā
Thereās too much thatās good to completely write off The Big Short, but thereās not enough here to explain its presence in the Oscar races for Picture, Director, and Supporting Actor (sorry Bale, I love you, but youāve been better elsewhere, and no one in the ensemble really stands out). Everything in it feels slightly mechanical, and we can see how everything is going to work out and where it is headed. But props to the film for being one of the better ones to explain and wrestle with depicting the modern financial crisis.
0 comments, Reply to this entry