Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

The Fourth Kind review

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 1 January 2012 10:01

I have mixed feelings about this movie. I had gone to it thinking the idea was 100% real but I later found out that most of the entire movie is fake, and probably all of it infact. I kind of clued in when they showed that "live" video of the man shooting his wife and kids. There is no way they could show that! They don't even on Youtube. I will say though that it was pretty well done and I honestly had trouble sleeping after I watched it. It was pretty much from one scene when Abbey listens to her own recording of herself in bed and the aliens creep in and mess her up. That part gave me chills up my spine and it was all I could think about when I was trying to sleep. Now, I've been watching horror since I was 8 years old and I have not lost sleep over a movie in probably 10 years so that says a lot. Overall it's not a bad movie but it would have got an extra star had it been a true case in the first place.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Fourth Kind review

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 10 September 2010 07:54

shame as really looked forwrd to seeing this - gets lost in itself and trys to deliver with shock that comes over weak.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Fourth Kind review

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 31 August 2010 02:40

The Fourth Kind was your basic alien horror flick. The alien's are never seen, half the time it's just talking and everyone ends up going crazy. However this movie was better than I thought it would be, but it tried too hard make the abduction scenes seem like they were amateur footage, which made those scenes kind of annoying, but still pretty creepy. I got scared a couple of times, but the scariest scene was the final part with the alien taking over that girls body. Overall, it wasn't good, but it wasn't horrible. It was bearable. 5.0/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Fourth Kind review

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 30 August 2010 03:33

assista o filme sem ler nada sobre ele. nem mesmo a sinopse.
achei o filme excelente sobre duas perspectiva: 1- se realmente é baseado em fatos reais, a história foi contada de uma forma excelente, 2 - se na verdade, eles enganam a audiência, e nada disso é baseado em fatos reais, é uma incrível idéia pra um filme ... leva 'bruxa de blair' pra um outro nível.
e eu não tô considerando se tudo o que aconteceu foi ou não verdade ... estou cogitando até se as imagens ditas reais no filme, foram mesmo reais.

quanto à história em si, é realmente intrigante. gosto muito desse tipo de plot, mas não sou muito fã dos filmes que são feitos sobre ele.
e esse definitivamente é um dos melhores já feitos sobre o assunto. mais pela forma diferente como conta tudo.
e sem querer forçar nada.

ok, nota 9 parece muito ... mas é que nesse genêro realmente foi um dos melhores que já vi.
e também conta que acabei de assisti-lo, então um pouco da adrenalina ainda pode tá influenciando o julgamento.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Ineffective more often than not...

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 3 March 2010 01:47

"This film is a dramatization of events that occurred October 1st through the 9th of 2000, in the Northern Alaskan town of Nome."


Similar to The Blair Witch Project and the recent Paranormal Activity, 2009's The Fourth Kind is a faux docudrama which depicts unnerving happenings through supposedly "authentic" footage. However, whereas Blair Witch and Paranormal Activity dealt with the realm of the supernatural, The Fourth Kind uses the coveted technique to tell the story of a supposedly real alien abduction. While not the first movie to use the suggestion of truth in order to sell an exhaustively fictional tale, The Fourth Kind is far more aggressive; frequently claiming through subtitles and to-camera asides that the narrative is word-for-word true. All the chutzpah promises a skin-crawling motion picture, yet, for all the hot air it generates, the movie is ineffective more often than not, and its "hook" is actually its greatest detraction.




Following a personal introduction by Milla Jovovich which promises that disturbing documentary footage is in store, the film focuses on the "real" and the reel Dr. Abigail Tyler (played by Jovovich during re-enactments) as she recounts her tale of alleged alien abduction. A psychologist in the Alaskan town of Nome, Abby employs hypnosis to help her patients recall events that they've blocked out, but soon realises a lot of them are recounting the same scenario. She comes to believe that these people are the victim of alien abduction and experimentation, and soon finds herself to be the latest target of these extraterrestrials.


As passionate a hoax as it may be, The Fourth Kind is still a hoax - it could even be considered entertainment fraud. That said, if you had no prior knowledge of the movie before watching it, and believed the story to be true as we're told, chances are you'd find it horrific and satisfying. And, to the credit of the filmmakers, some of the "real" footage manages to keep you on the fence as to whether it's genuine or not, even if you've heard it's fake. Heck, it may cause you to conduct days of research. The problem is that the filmmakers spent so much time making the thing seem real that basic narrative requirements are neglected, such as character development and plot momentum. And once you're aware it isn't real, you might choose to focus on the ridiculousness of the happenings that debunk its veracity, such as the wild-eyed Nome sheriff (Patton) coming this close to beating the hell out of Abby in her own home over claims of alien abduction, even though one of his own officers witnessed something in the sky and went on record saying so. The Fourth Kind is the type of film that would work better as a television movie or a Discovery Channel event. It could have also worked if a more conventional approach had been employed.




Director Olatunde Osunsanmi presents many scenes as "recreations" with professional actors assuming the identities of their counterparts. In an attempt to enhance the illusion, split-screen sequences are utilised which depict the "documentary" footage alongside these recreations. This may sound like an intriguing idea in theory, but in practise it's utterly disastrous. Since the most cursory Googling will quickly reveal the "real" footage is in fact fabricated, it means viewers are essentially being asked to watch a low-budget horror movie and its glossier remake at the same time. Added to this, all hope of character identification and genuine involvement in the story is jettisoned on account of this approach. See, films like Blair Witch and Paranormal Activity succeeded because they're entirely comprised of the "real" footage, and it's therefore easier to accept the illusion. The consequence of mixing "real" footage with traditional filmmaking techniques is a heavily contrived production. If the "authentic" footage and recordings are at the director's disposal, why not use them whenever possible and fill in the blanks using titles or the actors when necessary? Why not construct the narrative conventionally, complete with character development, and use the "authentic" footage and recordings sparingly? Better yet, why not abort the whole gimmick?


The title of The Fourth Kind is a reference to J. Allen Hynek's four categorisations of alien encounters. In accordance with Hynek's theories, the first kind = sighting, the second kind = evidence, the third kind = contact, and the fourth kind = abduction (Steven Spielberg referenced these categorisations back in the '70s with Close Encounters of the Third Kind). While the title of The Fourth Kind may spark interest with UFO enthusiasts, the product is too underwhelming to recommend. There are a few genuinely creepy sequences and images sprinkled throughout the film's runtime, but the material is too tame to generate any memorable horror (consider the PG-13 rating), and too contrived to work on a dramatic level.

5.3/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry