Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

The Rescuers Down Under review

Posted : 2 years, 1 month ago on 31 March 2022 09:25

It isn't as good as the immensely charming original, but I enjoyed this very much. You do realise that this was released 13 years after the original, and a lot of the characters had to be animated again. I forgive them for that though, as the animation was surprisingly good, especially the scenes with Marahute, who blew me away at the sight of her. Though Bianca does look different than she was in the original film, she had chubbier cheeks here. Bob Newhart and Eva Gabor are great as Bernard and Bianca, although there was a significant change in both characters. John Candy was hilarious as Wilbur. If there is one element that is better than the original, but only marginally, it is that Wilbur is funnier than Orville. The plot was also very good, on a parallel with the original, but that was the intention, and the music by Bruce Broughton was appropriately fitting. Cody is very likable, but sometimes his dialogue is a bit unnatural, and I know that people commented on his accent. George C. Scott, a fine actor, was suitably menacing as McLeach, although his animation at times was a tad frightening. I really enjoyed this movie, it's not perfect, but it is one of the better animated sequels to come out. 8/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Rescuers Down Under

Posted : 8 years, 5 months ago on 27 November 2015 07:28

The first official sequel produced by the Disney studio, The Rescuers Down Under sacrifices the bruised heart of the original in favor of razzmatazz and loud action sequences. There’s also a strange subplot involving John Candy’s albatross getting questionable medical care, played purely for slapstick but also completely unnecessary to the film as a whole. The Rescuers Down Under is a dip from the dizzy heights of The Little Mermaid, but it’s not the worst film in the Renaissance.

 

Reuniting with Bernard and Miss Bianca is pleasant, and it’s nice to see the latest development of Disney’s Nick and Nora Charles. Finding their way to Australia in search of a kidnapped boy, they team-up with a Crocodile Dundee-style mouse and a giant golden eagle, and take down an evil poacher. Never for one moment do we doubt that they’ll come out on top, and the various threats are never terribly threatening. There’s nothing here quite as fun as the smoky bayou chases or hungry alligators.

 

And our villain is a bit of a lame duck, never truly developing into something frightening, played too often for laughs, and he seems beamed in from a Mad Max movie. That last part would be particularly thrilling if they had managed to make him terrifying, but he gets involved with too many slapstick moments to register as truly deadly. Shame, as George C. Scott gives it his typical bravado and is clearly game to add a new name to Disney’s pantheon of movie villains.


Where The Rescuers Down Under really shines is in the chemistry between Bernard and Bianca, and the various flight scenes. Or when the film decides to scale back and just observe the Australian Outback. The landscapes are beautifully rendered, filled with warm hues and colors, and all manner of exotic flora and fauna. But the flight scenes are truly something, borrowing liberally from Hayao Miyazaki's flight scenes, they sweep us away: across a waterfall, through a forest, and up high into a mountaintop. If only the film had found a better story to wrap around these flight sequences. It's fun and entertaining, but incredibly slight and a comedown from the original's battered heart and empathetic connections.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Rescuers Down Under review

Posted : 11 years, 7 months ago on 12 October 2012 04:15

I actually enjoyed this movie more than the first one The Rescuers. I liked the villain more as well, great adventure movie. I loved it when I was younger.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 years, 10 months ago on 24 June 2012 03:52

I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out again.  Well, even though this movie was a big flop when it was released, it is stil has nowadays a decent reputation but, to be honest, I really struggled to care about the damned thing. First of all, it, I have always been rather supicious concerning those sequels delivered by Disney. Furthermore, even though 'The Rescuers' is a classic, I never really liked it  so I thought it was rather odd that they would choose to make a sequel for this particular feature. Anyway, at least, I have to admit that the animation was actually not bad at all with  some really impressive action scenes but it was probably the only thing that worked in this flick. Indeed, above all, the whole thing was just terribly boring. I have to admit it, my youngest daughter did enjoy it but, as far as I was concerned, it was not really entertaining and even rather lazy. Basically, the plot was just terribly generic and predictable and Bernard and Bianca who at least used to be cute and sweet in 'The Rescuers' had become such a bore in this sequel. In my opinion, the only slightly entertaining character was Joanna the goanna. Eventually, the damned thing was pretty weak and since it wasn't a success, Disney decided to not release most of their sequels theatrically anymore  and would rather choose to release most of them straight to dvd (one of the biggest swindle in motion picture history if you ask me). Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie might be enjoyable for young kids, I don't think it is actually really worth a look though.



0 comments, Reply to this entry