Nosferatu the Vampyre Reviews

Werner Herzog was, and still is, a very talented film-maker, but he's not the only reason as to why to see 'Nosferatu the Vampyre'. That it is based on a classic story, had a larger than life, commanding and great actor in the title role in Klaus Kinski and that it was a re-make of the 1922 Murnau masterpiece 'Nosferatu' were further interest points.

Admittedly did question as to whether 'Nosferatu the Vampyre' would work, being a re-make. Re-makes hardly ever are equal to their originals and some don't even come close. There is no doubting which is better and more influential between Murnau's film and this, but 'Nosferatu the Vampyre' is a strong example of a re-make that works well, with the Murnau film being a very clear influence, and is a very good film on its own terms. Found myself never questioning its necessity, like can be the case watching re-makes.

The ending is a little rushed and doesn't quite have the unforgettable chills or power of the 1922 film. Personally had little problem with the acting, but a couple of actors did deserve more screen time, a notable example being Van Helsing. Can understand the criticisms with the pacing, 'Nosferatu the Vampyre' to me actually worked very well as a deliberate mood piece and as a film told through primarily visuals but maybe yes it could have taken a little less longer to get going.

'Nosferatu the Vampyre' looks magnificent, perhaps one of Herzog's most visually striking and most atmospheric films. This is coming from the director whose films were also well-made and looked great but when his films are being talked about this element can be upstaged by the talking about the themes and Herzog's trademarks, which are undeniably fascinating to read and talk about but Herzog's production values are worthy of a little more credit. The colours dazzle, the lighting is very atmospheric with a striking contrast of light and dark, the production design is both audacious and eerie but how the camera shots and editing are composed.

Popol Vuh's music score is both unsettling and dream-like, matching the nature of the visuals perfectly. Typically Herzog directs splendidly, delivering on the substance as well as the style. The script flows surprisingly well and is cohesive, and the story is rich in an atmosphere that's at times grimly eerie and at times contemplative. Despite calling it a re-make, 'Nosferatu the Vampyre' is more a faithful homage while also having significant updates and expanding on the titular character's tragic loneliness.

Klaus Kinski is in towering form as Nosferatu. He is genuinely scary in a larger than life way, almost as nightmare inducing as Maximilian Schreck, but counter-points that wonderfully with tragic pathos delivered with heartfelt sincerity. While the other actors aren't quite as good the divide isn't as wide as one would think. Isabelle Adjani is suitably ethereal, making even more of an impression are Roland Topor's creepy, skin-crawlingly so, Renfield and Bruno Ganz's assertive but vulnerable Harker (a role much better acted than most, a notoriously bad example being Keanu Reeves in Coppola's otherwise often impressive film). Walter Ladengast is suitably low-key though with not a role as meaty as ought.

Overall, great film. 9/10 Bethany Cox

Herzog make wonders with 'the trip of death', Kinski-vampyr goingo by dilligence, by river boat and by ship to the city of Delft (location).

So far, it must be one of the best remakes I have ever seen. Of course, it might not have been as groundbreaking as the first version directed by F.W. Murnau but it was still a fascinating feature nonetheless. Indeed, I thought that the directing by Werner Herzorg was awesome and, in my opinion, it gave a totally different visual look on this story. On top of that, Klaus Kinski was a great substitute for Max Schreck. You might find it surprising but even though it might not be one of the most famous vampire flicks ever made, I believe it is actually one of the very best. Basically, they managed to create a great mood, reminiscent of the first version but still with its own style and flavor. Obviously, since it is rather slow, it is probably not for the impatient viewer and you shouldn't expect some spectacular stuff like you have in Francis Ford Coppola's version but it didn't bother me, in the contrary. To conclude, I think it is an amazing and underrated vampire flick, actually one of the best out there, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Werner Herzog's work.

"Death is not the worst. There are things more horrible than death."

It's an unfortunate fact that remakes have been commissioned for decades. Back in 1979 Werner Herzog set out to remake the unauthorised 1922 Dracula adaptation Nosferatu, which was directed by F.W. Murnau. The original 1922 silent movie will forever remain an essentially flawless horror classic. When Herzog decided to remake Murnau's masterpiece, it's obvious that he made a creative decision to stay more faithful to the source material written by Bram Stoker in the late 19th century. Originally, Murnau desired to make a cinematic version of Stoker's novel. However, due to copyright reasons, he was unable to fulfil this desire. Instead he made "cosmetic" changes to the novel (mainly changing the title from Dracula to Nosferatu) while keeping the original concept and essential series of events identical to the source material.

Herzog's remake is a courteous re-imagining of Murnau's early silent picture. This remake is neither scary nor brutal as most vampire-oriented horror pictures tended to be in later years. Herzog's movie is instead moody, mesmeric, and entrancing: it's inexorably sinister and spellbinding as the vampiric Transylvanian fiend spreads corruption and pestilence, fundamentally generating a pervading atmosphere of malevolence as opposed to outright horror thrills. Imagery of the town devastated by an unknown plague town is particularly memorable. However, Herzog's filmmaking techniques strictly fall into the category of "art house" and certainly won't be liked by all.

The film's plot remains faithful to its film forerunner as well as the original novel. Jonathan Harker (Ganz) works for a local real estate agency. Harker's employer sends him on an errand to stitch up a property deal with the enigmatically frightening Count Dracula (Kinski) who resides in the mysterious Transylvanian mountains. During Harker's expedition to Transylvania he discovers that the locals hearing the name Dracula is enough to build up anxiety, fear and trepidation. The locals are so terrified of Dracula's castle that no-one agrees to help him reach his desired destination. However, due to the promise of a substantial pay-check, Harker doesn't give up as he travels through the baffling, mesmerising landscape. Count Dracula transpires to be a bald man with a perplexingly disturbing personality underneath. Dracula is a man who perks up at the sight of blood...and at the sight of a photograph depicting Harker's striking wife Lucy (Adjani). Harker is left weakened and sapped of a lot of blood while Dracula sets forth for his new residence in search of Lucy. Dracula brings with him plague and death.

Werner Herzog's Nosferatu the Vampyre is slow-paced and a seemingly cumbersome film. This rendering of the classic vampire tale is simply one of the most stylish in existence. Herzog filmed his version across dazzling, extraordinary landscapes throughout Europe. The visuals also benefit from superb production design and excellent cinematography...everything is quite a treat to view. However there are countless flaws to also point out. Dramatically the film is exceedingly boring, as the slow pace is accompanied by mannered acting all-round. Perhaps this was intended to provide a dream-like quality to the proceedings, and in some ways it is quite successful. The stilted, unimaginative dialogue also drags the production down.

Klaus Kinski is an interesting embodiment of the Dracula character. Kinski portrays Dracula quite similarly to the Max Schreck depiction in 1922. His appearance is cadaverous, ghastly and almost rodent-like. His features are extremely distinguished, especially during dialogue or horror scene. Kinski is duly creepy and endows his portrayal with additional sympathy. He is what he is and can't help it, and it's palpable that he feels sorry for himself. He is a melancholy creature, discontented with his perpetually despondent condition yet unable to do anything about it. Nosferatu the Vampyre is a competent, atmospheric remake that has been regarded as one of the most faithful Dracula adaptations of all time. But, considering the quality of Murnau's masterwork, it isn't overly necessary.

6.2/10