Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Doesn't float quite as brilliantly

Posted : 1 year, 7 months ago on 4 September 2022 11:24

Stephen King's novel is a masterpiece, didn't properly appreciate it on first read but with King's style being much more familiar to me (whereas it was a bit of a shock at first) it still stands as a genuinely scary, nostalgic, at times very funny and very powerful book and one of his best. The 1990 mini-series is an uneven one, with a great first half and disappointing second half with the ending and IT's true form having notoriously poor reputations for good reasons. Absolutely loved the first 'IT' film from 2017 and consider it better than the mini-series personally.

'IT Chapter 2?' Not so much. Actually did find a lot to like about it, with a lot of what was great about the first film still here, and for me it is better than has been said. The mixed reception is more than understandable but it is not as terrible as the more negative reviews say in my view. Chapter 1 is the better film, but the second film is better than the second half of the mini-series on the whole and again it is a more than admirable and brave attempt at adapting an extremely difficult and near-unfilmable book.

While there is a good deal to recommend, there are some glaring problems. There are problems with the pacing here. Especially in the middle act, where it meanders due to being too flashback heavy. Some flashbacks being more interesting than others, with Ben's and Richie's being quite unnerving, Eddie's (the too long adult encounter not much better) was neither scary or memorable. The special effects are more variable this time round and suffer too from overuse. IT's true form comes off worst and is as bad, am not kidding here, as that in the mini-series which is notoriously universally panned.

The defeat of IT is beyond dumb and really undermines a final act that actually started off quite powerfully despite also being a bit too drawn out. Henry Bowers is also extremely underwritten, and both has little presence when having barely any screen time and quite badly overacted. Lets not get started on his very rushed, too easy and quite stupid defeat.

However, as was said before there is a lot to like. The production values mostly are terrific, not just the lighting but also the beautifully realised Derry setting, taut editing and cinematography that's both stunning and unnerving. Epileptics be warned though, there is a scene towards the end of the middle act that is heavy in strobe lighting effects. The music is haunting without being over-scored, ever since the first film it has been impossible to hear "Oranges and Lemons" in the same way again and that opinion has not changed. Andy Muschietti directs with suspense, potent realism, confidence and affection, while the writing (which is also remarkably true to King's style) has a great balance of hilarious comedy, touching drama and affectionate nostalgia. Richie getting the best lines.

Much has been said about the film being too long, am mixed on this consensus personally. The book is huge and both the child and adult time-lines need a quite long length to do it justice, having said that the middle act definitely could have done with a trim. The story is not just a horror story, but also blends humour (mostly from Ritchie), emotion and a 'Stand By Like' like nostalgia. There are memorable moments here, the Mrs Kersh encounter, the Fortune Cookie scene and the very freaky beginning (am amazed they managed to film this scene) being standouts. There is one improvement here over the previous film, Mike is much more interesting here which was necessary as this time as an adult he is something as the glue of the group.

Cannot fault the performances. All the adults are very well cast, with Bill Hader absolutely killing it as Richie, and the children are great again especially Finn Woolfhard and Sophia Lillis (the standouts in the first too). Bill Skarsgaard is again the stuff of nightmares as Pennywise, filling giant clown shoes with aplomb and putting his own spin on it. If asked who is better between Skarsgaard and the unforgettable Tim Curry, mainly because of more familiarity Curry gets the edge but they are both must sees in their own way.

Summarising, not brilliant and uneven but enjoyed it on the most part. 7/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 2 June 2021 10:39

To be honest, I have to admit that I was slightly worried about this movie. Indeed, when the first instalment was released, it had been hugely popular but I had noticed that this sequel didnā€™t make so much waves when it came out. However, since the damned thing was available on Netflix, I was quite eager to check it out anyway. I even re-watched the previous instalment the day before. At least, pretty much everyone seemed to agree that the actors to portray the adult versions of the kids were pretty much spot-on, even if, personally, I had a rather hard time to picture James McAvoy as the adult version of Bill Denbrough. On top of that, it is still hands-down one of the best stories delivered by Stephen King and it was just awesome to see again this group of friends more than 25 years later. Still, even if it turned out to be a decent watch, it was certainly a step-down from the previous movie though. Indeed, as long they focused on how the adult characters struggled with the traumatic experience they had when they were kids, the whole thing was actually pretty good but , unfortunately, they kept adding just too many stuff and most of it was barely interesting, at least, not to me. Some memory loss? Some ancient Indian ritual? A quest for some personal artifacts? The really far-fetched origins of Pennywise? Of course, I understand that most of it actually came from the book (which I havenā€™t read at this point) but I think it would have been much stronger if they have focused more on the characters themselves and what they were going through emotionally. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it is still a really strong story and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

IT: Chapter Two

Posted : 4 years, 5 months ago on 26 November 2019 02:16

Thereā€™s a multitude of problems in adapting any of Stephen Kingā€™s sprawling novels into a film, or in this case series of films. The sheer scope of the material means that any adaptation that is not a multi-episode miniseries is a mere scratch of the surface in comparison, his inability to satisfactorily conclude his narratives, and that the first half of IT is always more interesting than the second. IT: Chapter One zeroed in on the Losers Club as preteens facing down the horrors of shape-shifting alien trying to eat them, and it functions as a large metaphor for the pains of growing up.

Ā 

Chapter Two gives the adults the floor, and the more coke-fueled weirdness of Kingā€™s dense tome springs to the front during the adult section. Whether or not these tonal inconsistencies and sheer oddities of narrative mar or enhance the experience is up to the individual viewer. For me, Chapter Two was just a lot to take in, and Iā€™m still not sure Iā€™ve processed all of it or completely understand all its idiosyncratic choices.

Ā 

We pick up the story 27 years later as the malevolent spirit, Pennywise the Dancing Clown (Bill SkarsgĆ„rd, still playing the creature as alien impersonating humanity), reawakens and begins his reign of terror once more. This time, Pennywise emerges during a hate crime against a gay couple, the unlucky half being played by Xavier Dolan, but it isnā€™t long until kids start disappearing.

Ā 

Our heroes join forces to return to their hometown, a place theyā€™ve long since forgotten in a subplot thatā€™s frustratingly underexplored about how Pennywiseā€™s powers extend to memory manipulation outside of Derry and take down the murderous clown. Of course, we get flashbacks to the Losers Club as preteens as their memories return, and weā€™re treated to sight of de-aging technology used on teenagers to give them waxen, mask-like visages that are the most unsettling thing about the movie.

Ā 

If I sound a bit snarkier about this entry than the first one, then itā€™s simply because this one is both better and worse than its predecessor. We have awkward moments like an adult Eddie (James Ransone) getting vomited on by the leper scored to ā€œAngel of the Morningā€ or the adult Beverly (Jessica Chastain) getting attacked by a CGI monstrosity thatā€™s giggle-worthy for how bad it looks. Thereā€™s also the kinda hilarious/kinda terrifying reveal of the adult Henry Bowers (Teach Grant) being chauffeured by the rotting corpse of his teenage friend, Patrick.

Ā 

These moments are counterbalanced by scenes like adult Bill (James McAvoy) desperately trying (and failing) to save a young boy in a funhouse from becoming another casualty like Georgie. But this disparate tone problem underscores that IT: Chapter Twoā€™s ambition and scope is nearly too large and encompassing to be successful. Individual moments are thrilling, terrifying, absorbing as often as others are eye-roll inducing or just plain awkward.

Ā 

Still, the contours of the material are often smoothed over by a terrific ensemble of actors. Not only are McAvoy, Chastain, and SkarsgĆ„rd reliably strong in their roles, but Bill Hader emerges as the filmā€™s true MVP. Hader manages to dig deeper into Richieā€™s troubled psyche and conflicted feelings about his homosexuality in ways that the script and final product are perhaps too shy about exploring. While the other actors are playing types and doing so exceedingly well, Hader is crafting a recognizably real and honest person.

Ā 

Not even these actors can entirely save the ending of IT, though. Yes, the spider-like reveal of Pennywiseā€™s form is alluded to here, but without the celestial turtle. Instead, the Losers Club essentially bring about their own horcruxes and vanquish Pennywise with the power of friendship and love. Yeah, I had to do my best to stifle my guffaws that were just begging to escape. A film largely about going home again to reconcile with the past ends by stealing from the Harry Potter franchise. Ā Ā Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry