Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Dinosaur review

Posted : 2 years ago on 31 March 2022 09:38

I thought Dinosaur was a lovely film. The computer animation is beautiful, and I thought the music score was wonderfully dynamic. The vocal ensemble, lending their voices to a very likable bunch of characters, do a very commendable job, especially Samuel E.Wright, DB Sweeney, Joan Plowright and Haydn Pannettiere. My complaints with the movie are that the carnotaurs were very frightening, and some parts do drag in the story particularly in the middle. Still, it is redeemed by some beautiful animation, likable characters and very interesting parts in the script. In conclusion, compared to what it could have been, not that bad at all, though it never was supposed to surpass Pixar delights like Toy Story. 8/10 Bethany Cox.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 7 years, 6 months ago on 3 October 2016 12:39

I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I thought I might as well check it out again. If I recall it correctly, I actually saw the damned thing in the movie theater when it was released. Anyway, in my opinion, even though it is nowadays pretty much forgotten, I think it was actually one of the most promising Disney animated features, even if it turned out to terribly frustrating after all. Indeed, the introduction was just amazing, the animation was really impressive and the movie itself was at first quite mesmerizing … until those freaking dinosaurs started to talk. Seriously, it is not very often that I felt so betrayed by a movie. I mean, sure, since it was a Disney feature, I should have expected them to make these characters talk since it is one of their trademarks but it was just so disappointing. Apparently, the whole thing was supposed to be much darker and violent, without any dialogue, which all did sound pretty awesome but, to make it more commercially attractive, they eventually added those dialogues. To make things worse, the whole plot was seriously generic and rather tedious. Basically, it was some kind of mix of ‘Tarzan’ with a more realistic looking version of ‘The Land Before Time’. Eventually, as result, they came up with something visually really impressive but everything else was actually pretty weak, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it is actually one of the more original features delivered by Disney and I think it is worth a look but there is no doubt that it could have been so much better.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Dinosaur

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 17 December 2015 05:09

Technically proficient, occasionally even breathtaking and artistically pioneering, but narrative inert, Dinosaur plays like a less memorable retread of The Land Before Time. While that film gave us several memorable characters, both from their presence in the original film and the fact that they were franchised in such a manner as to even make Disney blush, Dinosaur gives us hollow emotions but pretty images. It’s enjoyable, but almost in spite of itself.

 

As with most reviews, Roger Ebert nailed it by stating: “An enormous amount of effort has been spent on making these dinosaurs seem real, and then an even greater effort was spent on undermining the illusion.” Truly, Dinosaur is most engaging when it sits back and just observes these animals, and comes to a grinding halt when it tries to make them as cutesy and cuddly as the forest denizens of Bambi or pride land dwellers in The Lion King. The original idea was to have Dinosaur be completely silent, making it essentially an upgrade to “Rite of Spring” in Fantasia. The first five minutes plays out how this film would have played out, and it’s the unquestionable highpoint.

 

We follow the journey of a random Iguanodon egg from the nest after its mother is forced to flee following an attack by a Carnotaurus to an island of lemurs. Once we land on this island, and all of the characters start talking, the problems quickly compound upon themselves. The lemurs and dinosaurs rarely appear to be occupying the same frame, with the dinosaurs covered in cracked lizard-like skin, and the primates looking like leaping bits of cotton balls. They’re so fuzzy and soft, sometimes to the point where they look like more traditionally animated critters next to the realistic dinosaurs.

 

The asteroid attack is quite beautiful, looking like heaven crying hot white tears, but it’s so dark in comparison to the rest of the film. The Carnotaurus is appropriately frightening, but the complete evisceration of the lemur island is an entirely different subject. As are the numerous scenes of dehydration, starvation, and general cruelty, Dinosaur can’t decide if it wants to be a faux-nature documentary or a silly kiddie film. It splits the difference, and ends up being a bit of a mess. The faux-wildlife documentary is the approach I would have taken, with occasional bits of narration to really sell the illusion. Yet I get the choice to make them talk and appear more humanistic. Would children and families have sat through an entirely silent, slightly scary and dangerous movie about dinosaurs being actual beasts?

 

But for special effects work that is fifteen years old, it’s still surprisingly solid to look at. Age shows in spots, mainly in the asteroids hitting the earth, the lemurs, and trying to stick cute, big Disney eyes on its heroic dinosaurs, but most of it is still gorgeous. That opening scene is a wonder, effectively combing live action backdrops with CG animals to create images that look like they could have plausibly happened in the era. The hulking mass of these animals is felt in numerous scenes of them interacting with dirt, rocks, water, or each other. Maybe the best way to watch Dinosaur is to mute the sound, and just bask in the images. The plot and characters are unimaginative and nondescript, but it’s combination of live-action and animation is still shockingly sturdy.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

I don't know why, I just do.

Posted : 17 years, 3 months ago on 24 January 2007 05:30

I didn't go to the cinema to see this film nor get it on DVD straight away. I remember I saw a documentary on how it was made.

Also, the fact that most of the scientific facts in the world were ignored just to make the film more 'cuddly' for kids.

However, I just knew i'd enjoy it. I don't know why but theres something about this film that made me like it. Maybe the graphics, maybe the characters, maybe the themes. I don't kno but i'll rate it 6 regardless.


0 comments, Reply to this entry