Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Beauty and the Beast

Posted : 5 years, 5 months ago on 29 November 2018 09:08

Hey, have you ever wanted to watch a version of the Beauty and the Beast fairy tale that added in unnecessary amounts of CGI, weird side stories involving fortune tellers, and tonally dissonant cutesy animals scurrying about the castle? If so, then have I got the monstrosity for you! A completely forgettable version that adds more tangents and garnishes to a sturdy tale that renders the whole thing strangely muted, and makes Disneyā€™s recent live-action version look like Cocteauā€™s by comparison.

Ā 

Why is making a movie of this so damn hard?

Ā 

Christophe Gansā€™ version is overburdened with sumptuous imagery that flirts with erotic intensity or perhaps fevered dream logic, but completely lacks the follow-through on either of those points. Then we get a brand new tragic backstory to explain Beastā€™s transformation and the magic emanating from his castle, and a Beauty that mainly involves its lead actress heaving her breasts and randomly warm-up to her suitor/capture without any budding romance to make the transition clear.

Ā 

Gansā€™ Beauty is quite literally sold into sexual slavery to transform the fortunes of her family, specifically the patriarch. Her eventual declaration of love for the Beast must happen, but thereā€™s been no sequences displaying a softening of their relationship, a growth in the Beast away from child-like id into maturity, or a sexual awakening within Beauty. It arrives at the exact point in the story when it must, but it doesnā€™t have the same sweetness of Disneyā€™s animated classic or the quiet, aching poetry of Jean Cocteauā€™s masterpiece. Like much of the film, it just happens and exists because the nature of the story demands it as such.

Ā 

Even worse is the lack of chemistry between Beauty and Beast. How to cast Vincent Cassel, an actor of volcanic sexual dynamism, and manage to make him limp, awkward, and unattractive is a feat, gross incompetence, or both. LĆ©a Seydoux manages to make Beauty something of a presence, but itā€™s hard to really gage given how little sheā€™s truly asked to do. You watch them in other films and feel a combustible sexual ferocity from each of them, but itā€™s not here. Perhaps all of the pageantry rendered them a little out to sea?

Ā 

The worst offense is how hard Gans is clearly working to create something that looks and feels magical, yet thereā€™s nothing grounding it or making it feel like an extension of the characters. Beastā€™s castle is a series of lovely sets that donā€™t feel like a coherent vision. The best versions of this story generate a palpably real, magical setting that is as much a reflection of the Beastā€™s psyche as it is a place for magical occurrences. It feels inevitable that twisted statues ornamenting the property would come alive and attack the interlopers. Thereā€™s been a glut of fairy tale blockbusters, effectively trying to transform the Grimms into Tolkein and often failing, and this Beauty and the Beast falls victim to that tendency.

Ā 

All this did is made me feel wistful and depressed that Guillermo del Toroā€™s proposed version will never see the light of day. Ā Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 7 years, 10 months ago on 1 July 2016 08:56

Next year, Disney will come up with another live-action version of this classic tale but the French have already released their own version in the mean time.Well, even though it was visually pretty neat, I was actually rather bored by the damned thing. I donā€™t know, maybe it was because it was just too familiar with this old tale or it was maybe the fact that I didnā€™t care much for the new ideas they added to the mix. Furthermore, while Vincent Cassel was a perfect choice to play the Beast, I'm afraid the lovely LĆ©a Seydoux Ā was rather miscast to play the title character. I Ā mean, Seydoux is really talented, no doubt about it but, so far, I have seen her only play some cold ice queen girls and I would definitely not choose her to play a cute and innocent princess in a fairy tale like this one. It's such a pity that, after 8 long years, Christophe Gans would deliver such an underwhelming feature. Indeed, even though Gans must have been one of the most promising French directors of his generation, he doesn't seem to be able to finish most of his projects and, therefore, he apparenly managed Ā to get some financing only for such a boring fairy tale. To conclude, it was really nice to look at, I'll give you that, but I think that my rating might be actually generous for this movie.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Beauty and the Beast review

Posted : 9 years, 4 months ago on 29 December 2014 01:13

Visually stunning, and worth watching only for that. Quite poor acting performances. Why is it I always feel a movie's a comedy when watching French actors perform? Such theatrical acts.


0 comments, Reply to this entry