Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 18 January 2011 07:19

I already saw this movie but since it was a while ago and since I had it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. I guess that many viewers must have thought, when they heard that it would be an adaptation of a Science-Fiction book from Philip K. Dick, that they would get something more similar to 'Blade Runner' and they must have been sorely disappointed but that's in fact something that made this movie even more interesting to me, the fact that it displayed a future really similar to our world. Anyway, even though this movie seems to be rather forgotten nowadays, I  thought it was actually rather awesome and the story was just quite fascinating, at least, for me. Furthermore, I just loved the animation which was just so original and so amazing to look at. The concept was just very original and it was a perfect fit for this story. Indeed, even though it could have been a lame gimmick, I thought it was a great way to convey the general confused state of mind of a drug addict. Sure, the pacing was rather sluggish, many scenes were rather random and I didn't care much for some of the sub-plots, especially this twist at the end that Winona Ryder's character was also a cover agent. Still, most of it work really well for me and it think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's alright, but not for me!

Posted : 15 years, 3 months ago on 6 February 2009 09:41

Finally got it off my ‘to watch’ list and I’m perplexed, was it the subject matter that didn’t appeal to me, or was it just the movie as a whole. Have to say 50/50 at this point. I’m glad I watched it for Rory Cochrane’s performance alone as Charles Freck, which was both wonderful and surprising.

I’m annoyed at the predictability of the movie as a whole - the set-up for the surprise discovery and conclusion were both right there at the start. The animation/rotoscope wasn’t bad when it was just posterised live footage, but when mixed media was used, perspectives went array and I began feeling nauseous.

I like to see humanity evolve or some personal development at least. In the movie Blade Runner we were left pondering the humanity of the replicants, and even questioning if Rick Deckard wasn’t one himself. This movie, which is based on another Philip K Dick story, just shows society declining into a surveillance heavy police state, whilst the populace declines into a drug-induced stupor.

Glad I now know what its about, but not a movie I would ever recommend or return to myself.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Clearly? Or darkly?

Posted : 15 years, 6 months ago on 11 November 2008 03:55

''The pain, so unexpected and undeserved had for some reason cleared away the cobwebs. I realized I didn't hate the cabinet door, I hated my life... My house, my family, my backyard, my power mower. Nothing would ever change; nothing new could ever be expected. It had to end, and it did. Now in the dark world where I dwell, ugly things, and surprising things, and sometimes little wondrous things, spill out in me constantly, and I can count on nothing.''

An undercover cop in a not-too-distant future becomes involved with a dangerous new drug and begins to lose his own identity as a result.

Keanu Reeves: Bob Arctor

Richard Linklater's A Scanner Darkly(2006) is a humanistic and undeniably heartbreaking adaptation of Phillip K Dick's novel. What works is the film's pre-occupation with the human condition; focusing on the emotional and psychological effects of substance abuse, relationships, and essentially, trust; or lack of trust.



The performances are wonderful. Keanu Reeves' portrayal of Bob/Fred is incredibly sensitive and thoughtful. His final scene in the field, picking a blue flower, showed what a subtle and textured actor he can be. Winona Ryder is also really moving as Donna, the object of Bob/Fred's desires. Every word homes in. She seemed to capture a sense of mystery, eternal sorrow, and confusion within the phrasing of her dialogue and the tiniest of exchanges with Keanu. The scene in which the couple argue about Donna's refusal of intimacy is excellent and the chemistry really tense. There's a wonderful sense of rhythm within the delivery, and the emotion is raw. It is a good comeback. As for Downey Jr and Harrelson; they work incredibly well, bouncing off one another with the air of camp, dry wit and fun. Blowing smoke rings, watching someone choke, freaking out about a nine speed bike and the state of the universe, are all delivered with conviction and strength. Downey's Barris is stern; but also a lot of fun. Whilst Harrelson really shines when utterly confused, stoned, and paranoid.

''Total total total totally total total... total providence.''

The animation is also truly beautiful. It is rich, and artistically vibrant. It works in the film's favour, conveying a sense of hyper-reality that is also embedded within every day life. It feels real, rather than detached or futuristic. We are engrossed, not removed from the story or its characters.
The animated overlay very clever too, especially that scramble suit, which conceals its wearer's identity.
Some really clever and funny scenes that amuse and seem totally pointless. Loving the characters having idea bubbles or Freck's suicide note with the alien, Freck holding Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead; A truthful, powerful testament and compliment to Philip K Dick. Amazing how their conversations always end up being from bicycle to silenced foiled guns to paranoia about someone being in their house.
There's a major twist and may take more than one viewing to appreciate the complex ending. So amazing when you piece it together. Richard Linklater did a wonderful job directing and executing this. It has become a Graphic novel that comes to life with artistic realism that conveys the druggy state of the movie's message.
The story runs at an exciting pace; keeping you on the edge of your seat to continue and uncover Bob Arctor's fate. Will he be arrested although he is taking surveillance of himself? Or will he be able to find a bigger fish to fry while making his cover and descent to hell mean something? The layers Linklater has sewn together here are all superimposed on each other to great effect.

The language has many quotable passages that you can almost feel are Dick's words; for this I commend Linklater for the courage to stick to the real heart of the story. I almost don't have to mention the roto-scoping effect used, similar to the director's previous gem Waking Life. Without the freedom animation allows, the movie could not have been as successful as it is. I praise all involved as this journey continues with its laughs and tears all culminating in the heartbreaking finale, that when looking back really is the only way it could have played out. Also, it was a very nice touch, before the credits, having Philip K. Dick's memoriam for all his friends that had died or suffered immensely from the effects of drugs. A Scanner Darkly tries to give meaning to their descent and a glimmer of hope for the future to one day rid itself of the voluntary plague of drugs represented by Substance D.

''What does a scanner see? Into the head? Into the heart? Does it see into me? Clearly? Or darkly? Clearly or darkly? I hope it sees clearly, because I can't any longer see into myself. I see only murk. I hope for everyone's sake the scanners do better. Because if the scanner sees only darkly, the way I do, then I'm cursed and cursed again. I'll only wind up dead this way, knowing very little, and getting that little fragment wrong too.''


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A Scanner What?

Posted : 17 years, 1 month ago on 9 April 2007 01:12

First off I never quite understood the meaning behind this films animated adaptation. The animation was awful, something any first design student could have pulled off with a hacked version of Adobe Flash Pro. How Keanu Reeves manages a career in the acting business I will never know. Although Robert Downey Jr. poured in a decent performance, I hardly think it was a stretch from his normal life. That being said, what the hell was this movie about? I fell asleep half way through.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A let down

Posted : 17 years, 3 months ago on 12 February 2007 02:14

Grand Assault's review is spot on in this case. I too wanted this movie to be so much more, and was fascinated by the trippy animation, but overrall it was a dissapointment. This film had a great theme and animation, and the 'concept' of the plot was decent, but through most of the movie, the dialogue was just too distracting and off-topic that I just got lost and stopped caring about what happens to any of the characters.

And i think Keanu once again proves that he's just a hack of an actor. The only good performance in this film was from Downey Jr, as well as a few scenes from Harrelson.


0 comments, Reply to this entry