Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End review

Posted : 2 years ago on 25 March 2022 12:52

I will say I absolutely loved Curse of the Black Pearl, it's one of my all-time favourite movies. Dead Mens Chest was enjoyable and lively, if overlong. At World's End is certainly not a terrible film, far from it, I just found it rather disappointing that's all, plot-wise being the least remarkable of the three films. I will say there is a lot to recommend it, namely the art direction, and the special effects weren't too bad either. The cinematography was impressive, there is some lovely period detail and I thought there were some very well staged battle sequences. The music by Hans Zimmer, one of my favourite film composers, was outstanding, very rousing and dramatic. And the performances weren't so bad either- Jack Sparrow is still the lovable rogue we have come to know and love, and Johnny Depp played him marvellously. A very talented actor, Geoffrey Rush, sinks his teeth into the part of Captain Barbosa, I particularly loved the line, "I'm a bit busy at the moment." And Bill Nighy was delightfully villainous as Davy Jones. However, the film does have flaws that prevents it from being the rollicking film it had the potential of being. The plot did take a while to get going, and sometimes became unfocused and convoluted, like Elizabeth and Will declaring their wedding vows in the middle of a big fight. Also there are a lot of characters, and one or two of them served no real purpose to the plot, and a lot was crammed into the long running time, so at the end of the day, it felt a bit bloated. The script was full of existing jokes, not necessarily a bad thing, but overall it lacked freshness, and the humour and fun, that made me love the first film so much. Overall, it is certain performances, fantastic music and some well-staged battles that salvage an otherwise bloated and disappointing second sequel. 6/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worldā€™s End

Posted : 7 years, 6 months ago on 9 October 2016 02:09

If the prior yearā€™s Dead Manā€™s Chest was a rollercoaster that consistently threatened to careen wildly off the tracks at any moment, then At Worldā€™s End is a whirligig on a crumbling foundation. The sense of bloat thatā€™s always threatened to devour these films reaches its apex here, with nearly three hours of convoluted plotting, unnecessary side-plots, and lore that spirals out quick enough to meet the demands of the plot.

Ā 

Once more, I donā€™t hate this entry in the Pirates franchise, but with (broken) promise that this would end the series, it seemed a fitting enough ending. Will and Elizabeth grew over the course of the series, their plots get a pleasing conclusion, Jackā€™s sense of self-preservation warred with his better impulses, and Barbossa chewed scenery throughout. Keith Richards cameos as Jackā€™s father, an assembly of pirate leaders provides many uniquely colorful and distinct characters, and thereā€™s enough spectacle for several films to be found here.

Ā 

Itā€™s just incoherent and needlessly complicated. Itā€™s easy to forget that this was once based on a theme park attraction! Granted, The Curse of the Black Pearl used up a majority of the most famous sights and sounds of the ride so they had to branch out. I said most, At Worldā€™s End includes audio lifted directly from the original ride. Just in time for these back-to-back sequels, Disney completely renovated the ride to include Jack, Davy Jones, Barbossa, and the cursed Aztec gold in a bit of corporate synergy. If that isnā€™t a perfect metaphor for the presence of these sequels, I donā€™t know what else is.

Ā 

Does the plot really matter? No, it hasnā€™t in any of these up to this point, and this one is overstuffed to the max. Thereā€™s Chow Yun-Fat as a pirate lord of Singapore, and completely underutilized, and Davy Jones and Tia Dalmaā€™s past is revealed while simultaneously shuffling them off to the side to focus onā€¦. well, itā€™s hard to say. Thereā€™s the East Indian Trading Company, led by Tom Hollanderā€™s sneer and glower, thereā€™s the gathering of pirate lords, thereā€™s Davy Jones and Tia Dalma, thereā€™s our two love birds, thereā€™s Barbossa, and they each double-cross each other then go back again. Then they switch sides once more, before switching back, and are you confused yet? Good. You should be.

Ā 

None of it makes any sense, and good luck trying to keep all of the players and their motivations square. I gave up a long time ago and just sat back to watch the visual splendor of it all. And there is a ton of it to be found. While the franchise may have squandered much of the good will from the first film by this point, director Gore Verbinski still gave you plenty of reason to keep your eyes on the screen with his imaginative and distinct images. A pirate ship sailing across a still sea with the stars reflected upon the surface, given the distinct impression of them sailing through space, has enough poetry in it to keep your interest.

Ā 

The thing thatā€™s so damned frustrating about these sequels is how they drop in a series of smart ideas and characters with potential, then squander it all with stupid choices. Elizabeth Swannā€™s transformations from society ingĆ©nue to pirate king (yes, king) is far more interesting than Will Turner and his daddy issues, but guess who gets the lionā€™s share of the screen time? Then thereā€™s Davy Jones, so major a role in Dead Manā€™s Chest, stuck playing supporting player to far less interesting characters, while Tia Dalma and Commodore Norrington barely register in this bloated epic at all. Meanwhile, Jonathan Pryceā€™s Governor Swann has spent the entirety of this trilogy as background decoration and little else.

Ā 

The darkness that threatened to overtake Dead Manā€™s Chest swallows up At Worldā€™s End, quite literally in the climactic battle between all three major parties across two boats locked together over a whirlpool. Or the opening, which finds pirates (or those accused of piracy, or those found guilty of aiding piracy, including a young child) being led to their death, by hanging no less, and defiantly singing a sea shanty while waiting for the bottom to drop. It is in these moments that the filmā€™s muchness becomes a serious case of too much of a good thing. I respect the titanic ambitions and originality of visual splendor in these films, even their sense of fun, but my god, there is such a thing as too much of a good thing. Then they made a fourth film.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Bored and Confused

Posted : 9 years, 1 month ago on 12 March 2015 01:51

For my money Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worldā€™s End represents everything wrong in contemporary blockbuster cinema and anyone who paid money to go and see is contributing to the decline of western civilization; unfortunately that also includes me resulting in the single most boring, confusing and frustrating movie I ever had the misfortune of viewing and in a movie theatre no less! For beginners, the movieā€™s opening scene which shows people including children being hanged should act as a metaphor for the next 168 minutes of terror.

Ā 

A $300 million dollar budget, and for what? Huge CGI battle sequences with characters I couldnā€™t give a monkeys about fighting each other, well actually I take that back because I donā€™t even know what theyā€™re fighting about. This movie is like the First World War, nobody knows what itā€™s all about. I enjoyed the first installment of this franchise was disappointed with the sequel due to its incomprehensible plot but At Worldā€™s End goes beyond that. I literally donā€™t have a clue what is going on. Whose side anyone is on? Whoā€™s that guy? Why are they going to this place? Whatā€™s that thing? Even reading the movieā€™s plot on Wikipedia I canā€™t get my read around it but then again they did start shooting the film before a script was completed.

Ā 

While I enjoyed Johnny Deppā€™s performance in the first two movies here he is, no apologies, annoying; very, very annoying. When we are first introduced to Jack Sparrow in this film it isnā€™t just one Jack Sparrow, there are dozens of Jack Sparrows and they wonā€™t shut up. Too much a good thing, way too much! One scene which particular aggravated me is when a bunch of characters are sitting around a table debating who knows what and it goes on for an eternity. Itā€™s like 12 Angry Men, except itā€™s not and thereā€™s only one angry man, me, watching the dam thing. I tend to avoid using the word hate unless I really mean it but few other movies have enraged me as much as this ā€œmovieā€. I know every movie on the IMDB boards has a topic in which some proclaims it as the worst film theyā€™ve ever seen but Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worldā€™s End really is one of the absolute worst films Iā€™ve ever seen.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

The best in the series

Posted : 10 years, 2 months ago on 16 February 2014 01:00

ā€˜Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worldā€™s Endā€™ is actually not just better than ā€˜Dead Manā€™s Chestā€™ but also the best in the series and better than ā€˜The Curse of the Black Pearlā€™, Davy Jones was an interesting villain that has a heart (not in his body) and heā€™s presumably half CGI, the action scenes were actually really mind blowing, on the minus side I thought the plot was actually rather weak but my favourite thing about ā€˜At Worldā€™s Endā€™ was the relationship between Will Turner and Elizabeth Swann, particularly what happens between them at the end was something weird but also interesting, at the end, it gave you a boost on the fourth movie ā€˜On Stranger Tidesā€™ which focused on the Fountain of Youth, sadly the plot about the Fountain of Youth was linked to a bad movie!


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End review

Posted : 10 years, 10 months ago on 2 June 2013 07:36

... aaannnddd Geoffrey Rush is back. Honestly, for me the only reason to enjoy the series is Rush. His quite affable character, Hector Barbossa, is the main backbone of the series: maybe that's the reason why I didn't enjoy the second part, but the first one and this one. Also, his crazy, but solidly dignified, performance that outmatches almost everyone. Mind you, I said almost, and the barrier that prevents me from writing "all" is, as you all know, Johnny Depp and his wildly eccentric performance as Jack Sparrow. There's a "captain" there somewhere, but I can't find it. Now this is how a PotC film should be done, fun, exciting, funny, great battle scenes, and one tight story with brilliant script-writing. I kid you not, but this installment actually increased my vocabulary. Belligerent, homunculus and perfidious have all entered my vocabulary. Now I just need the right reason to use them. Also bosun, but I already knew that; this film confirmed the meaning for me.

The directing this time around was mature, the cinematography was apex. The sequence where Sparrow is in Davy Jones' Locker was mesmerizing in its quality, humorous in its sub-story. Those 5 minutes very well could be a short film on its own, a sort of a feature that precedes certain cartoons, like the one in A Bug's Life. Although I was quite disappointed that they didn't show any battle concerning Kraken, I was later on glad they didn't; given the many battles and fights that happen, any Kraken one would've lost its appeal and would've dragged on the already long screen-time. Amidst this, a small hindrance did rise by the usage of tried and tested jokes, but they made up for that by creating a rather formidable villain out of Lord Cutler Beckett and making Elizabeth Swann a warrior woman, a sort of Lucy Lawless of the high seas. Despite the fact that the light was cast more strongly on the love story between the two coffee-faced lovers, the overall effect was less slushy than what I was expecting. Not to say I didn't like it, but it was a good move, it was in league with the rest of the film, although the "do you love me" and the "wedding scene" on the ship near the climax did drag on quite a bit.

Going back to the humour, it waded on dangerous waters (man, I'm using a lot of puns nowadays) when Barbossa places a pair of metal balls in an awkward position that does not go amiss with Sparrow. A short thinly-veiled conversation ensues, which may not be deciphered by kids, but will make a lot aware adults raise their eye-brows. I mean, seriously? Was that really necessary? When will Disney cease its obsession with subliminal messages / themes I do not know.

From the performances, all the returning cast were as strong as ever, with Keira Knightley being the most impressive. I loved how she transited from a dependent to an independent woman, but there certainly was interdependence between her and several characters, namely Sparrow and Turner. Speaking of which, Orlando Bloom was actually better in this one than the first two, provided strong shoulders - especially near the end of the film. Bill Nighy once again was impressive, although I felt he was underused. Tom Hollander gave a rather strong performance. His character, Beckett, provided a good mix of a man torn between "business", "revenge" and "pleasure." In an inspiring cameo, Keith Richards dominated his 3 minutes of reel fame. Chow Yun-Fat, too, in his short screen-time was awesome. But a painfully under-developed script and short screen-time made his character, Sao Feng, somewhat unmemorable.

In conclusion, At World's End is an awesome film. The Maelstrom Battle? Arguably one of the greatest battle scenes in all of movie history.

8.5/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 years, 4 months ago on 11 December 2012 12:43

Ten years ago, when the first trailers showed up for a hopeful big summer blockbuster, many thought it would be a disaster. Indeed, they were taking on a genre which until then produced only flops and this flick was starring some relative unknowns backed up by quirky character actor Johnny Depp, and finally it was based on a very unlikely source material. But the summer of 2003 saw "Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse Of The Black Pearl" become a monster hit, launching one of the biggest modern-day franchises turning Depp from a box-office poison with a few die-hard fans to a global megastar. But how was this 2nd sequel? It was not bad and even rather entertaining but it all depends to which movies you will compare it eventually. I mean, if you compare it to some other recent blockbuster such as the ā€˜Transformersā€™ franchise or ā€˜Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skullā€™, then it is rather decent with some impressive action scenes and some pretty cool special effects. But if you compare it to Johnny Depp's older and more obscure work such as ā€˜Fear and Loathing in Las Vegasā€™, ā€˜Dead Manā€™, ā€˜Ed Wood, ā€˜What's Eating Gilbert Grapeā€™, ā€˜Arizona Dreamā€™, ā€¦ than it is pretty damned disappointing. Above all, the story was just a mess. Indeed, it went along for way too long and it was just way too convoluted. After watching this 3rd movie, you wonder if they should have made those sequels at all but since the 1rst movie was a huge success, it was rather inevitable. To conclude, even though it is nothing amazing whatsoever, it still remains a fun blockbuster and it is worth a look, especially if you enjoyed the previous installments.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Review of Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End

Posted : 12 years, 1 month ago on 15 March 2012 09:17

A disappointing third film in the Pirates series. It suffers from all the problems of the first and second, and then some. Much of the appeal of the first two are gone, and what remains is a confusing, boring, and unfunny second sequel.

Problems abound from everywhere, so I'll be working hard to narrow it down.

For one, Johnny Depp's role as Jack Sparrow is once again shrunken into a smaller part.

Also there is absolutely no action that is even vaguely interesting (after the first half hour). In fact, the last hour is at least 45 minutes action, and it's surprisingly dull. In fact, it's tedious. It's just people killing each other, and nothing interesting about it. There's no variety, no interesting atmosphere. Just swords clashing.

There is a plot, which is more than what can be said for the second, but it's so confusing, with so many characters and sub plots and deceptions and people changing sides, that it's almost completely incomprehensible.

Most of the characters are obnoxious, and though that was apparent in the first two, it is even more so now.

There are too many flat gags, too many boring scenes, and too many characters for the film to flow well. There were times when I wondered what the purpose was for really anything going on during the movie.

There are some good things though. The first half hour is strong, just like the first two flicks, but after that, the movie is drop dead boring.

The score is another winner from composer Hanz Zimmer, albeit a tad familiar. The acting is dependable, and even admist a thousand bad jokes, there's at least a few laughs (or chuckles really).

There is one bizzare scene where godess of the sea, Calypso is turned back into her original form. This scene is so weird, stupid, and nonsensical, it's hard not to burst out laughing (I most certainly did). Let's just say that she grows about 1,000 feet high, talks like she has really bad congestion, looks like she's constipated, and eventually explodes into a million crabs. It's even more ridiculous on screen.

When the film closes, you will either be waiiting in great anticipation for the fourth (if you enjoyed it), or you'll be fast asleep or about ready to be (if you're me).


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Disappointing but it did have some fun moments.

Posted : 13 years ago on 19 April 2011 01:58

The Pirates Of The Caribbean franchise have been in my good books after two fantastic films that we had seen thus far and the ending of Dead Man's Chest was such a tease and the trailer of At World's End looked epic and looked like it could be the best of the series yet. However, it turned out to be the worst of the trilogy, it wasn't even half as epic as expected but there were a few moments where I really enjoyed the film. The enjoyable parts consisted of obviously the great effects and action scenes, the humorous scenes and seeing Johnny Depp as Captain Jack once again.


However, the negative points were these: the film was really rushed despite it was longer than both its predecessors, the plot became quite confusing and didn't go into great depth like the two predecessors did and were really wanting badly out of this one and too many characters were killed off so quickly so throughout most of the time, it was rather flat. What At World's End lacked the most was emotion, the epic feeling about the film and there were quite a few almost completely pointless parts involved in the film. Those who have seen the film will know which particular part that I am referring to. Hint: 'romantic' scene in an awkward situation. Admittedly, it was a very funny film as predicted and there were a few good jokes but even that didn't entirely save the film.


Elizabeth, Will and the crew of the Black Pearl sail off the edge of the map with the help of mysterious Tia Dalma and the late Captain Barbossa who has been raised by the dead to save Captain Jack Sparrow from Davy Jones' Locker. He has been condemned to the terrible fate of remaining in the void of Davey Jones' Locker for eternity. Meanwhile, Davy Jones and his crew are now under the possession of Lord Cutler Beckett and the East India Trading Company seeing as they possess his heart and the odds are against the pirates to end victorious. Jack, Barbossa, Will, Elizabeth, Gibbs and all of the pirates unite and make their final stand to defeat the East India Trading Company and Davy Jones and his crew on the Flying Dutchman to earn their freedom.


Jack Sparrow's return and that he would come back after being taken to the Locker by the Kraken as well as the Black Pearl was an instant spoiler. I guess that was also the same case with Han Solo's return in Return Of The Jedi. There may have been a few more characters but in a lot of ways, it became another completely different story and that didn't quite work seeing as there were incredibly high expectations for this film. I mean, knowing about Calypso? Why was this not mentioned in Dead Man's Chest especially when that character was part of it and was actually quite a crucial character in it despite didn't appear that much. The exact same thing could be said in Geoffrey Rush returning as Barbossa when he died in Curse Of The Black Pearl and made a shocking return at the end of Dead Man's Chest. We saw a different bond between Jack Sparrow and Barbossa in At World's End because we all know they don't like each other due to the history between them but they are allies more than anything in this one despite their conflicts.


Orlando Bloom, just when I thought you couldn't sink any lower with your bad performance as Will Turner in both Curse Of The Black Pearl and Dead Man's Chest! He sinks to the lowest level of acting that he has ever done and quite possibly ever will do and there really was nothing exciting, heroic or even emotional about his performance in this film (not even the desire and desperation to free his father 'Bootstrap' Bill Turner from Davy Jones and his crew). So there was no surprise that he earned a Razzie nomination for Worst Supporting Actor and I am so glad that this is the last time we see Orlando Bloom in a Pirates Of The Caribbean film again. Keira Knightley makes a decent return as Elizabeth Swann and delivers another good performance. Like in Dead Man's Chest but even more in this one, Elizabeth Swann is no innocent woman anymore and one that you really don't want to mess with. She does show her beauty, of course but she is a bit like a bad girl especially because she is siding with the pirates, she is slowly becoming pirate herself.


After two great successful predecessors in the Pirates Of The Caribbean trilogy, I thought Gore Verbinski slightly went out of hand with this one and it became quite flat and rather rushed but it was still well-filmed on some occasions and has some great action as predicted. Knowing that he didn't direct On Stranger Tides (fourth instalment in the series), it is quite a good thing that he didn't because although the trilogy wasn't perfect, it still gave exactly what it was going out to achieve in the first place: excitement and great fun for adults and children around.


Overall, Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World's End is a neither bad nor good film that is a disappointment to Curse Of The Black Pearl and Dead Man's Chest but does have some good qualities that make up for some of those flaws. There were quite a few irrelevant and rather laughably pathetic scenes and changes in the story and I can understand why people either dislike or hate this film but the film, in my opinion, still had its entertaining moments. Admittedly, the ending was good and we were really expecting another instalment so let's see what Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides brings us in May 2011.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Hooray for nothing!

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 26 December 2009 09:08

A random assortment of people try to save Jack Sparrow from... I don't know where, it was called something but it was never specified at all. Anyway, they try to save him because it's a pretty good way to spend 90 minutes of this film, atleast on paper. Then there's an ultimate battle or something with Evil Colonel from part 2.

I watched a film called Zodiac yesterday. It was over 2 and a half hours long. I was never bored during that time. It was awesome to be honest. Today, I watched a film called Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. It was almost 3 hours long. It bored me. But unlike the second part, this one bored me with extremely bad jokes and useless drama, and dull McGuffins. Seriously, this movie has every single McGuffin ever even remotely mentioned in the series, in an important position for the "plot." When it comes to the script of this film, I'm actually surprised. The previous movie really had about 10-20 minutes of actual story, but then this film has about... Well, 10-20 minutes of actual plot, but instead of filling the film with action like was done in part 2, here we get ludicrously bad drama scenes. The humour has greatly improved since the previous movie, since I actually laughed a few times in this one (I even laughed at Sparrow once). The new and old characters here are awful, they're all cliched stereotypes that should not exist in modern cinema. Especially the man played by Chow-Yun Fat is the most stereotypical hard-ass asian I've ever seen. I can't believe Fat acted the part the way he did, since he has proved time and again that he is in fact a magnificent actor. But on the other hand this same movie has Johnny Depp "acting" as some weird drunkard, so bleh.

However, the pacing of this film is rather well composed. Since we don't get an overload of action until the very end of it, you might just notice yourself wanting to see some good old fashioned swashbuckling. This is why the indefinately best part of the entire picture, the ending, works so well. We get an action scene about 20 minutes long, which, in quality, is about as good as the action in the first part of the trilogy, but because we have been numbed by the horrible drama of the movie to that point, this mediocre action scene seems damn near divine. POTC 3 is a movie like LOTR: Return Of The King; it has about five million endings, all of which are just as boring as the other. And there's even an ending after the end of the credits, which I didn't stick around for though. The score is once again composed by Hans Zimmer, and it's mindnumbingly dull with it's repetetive sounds and second-grade choirs. Verbinski, as I've mentioned previously, is adored by yours truly because he directed The Weatherman, but in this film he produces yet again an average result. It's not as if this movie would look bad; it just hasn't got anything visually that we haven't seen before. With all this being said, I loved one scene from this film. Before the final fight, the leaders of the bad guys and the leaders of the good guys gather on a small piece of land. This scene is played off as an homage to old westerns, with it's Morricone-ish score and tight close-ups. I smiled.

The time of pirates has truly come to pass. It was over in my opinion when Erroll Flynn stopped making pirate movies. Everything that can be taken from the subject of pirates, has already been taken. The topic has been sucked dry. Someone just needs to tell this to Jerry Bruckheimer, so he would stop producing movies about them.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad review of Pirates!?!

Posted : 16 years, 1 month ago on 26 February 2008 11:29

The storyline of this film feels like butter spread to thin. There wasn't enough storyline or original writing to maintain the premise...how shall we fill the glaring gaps? With loads of special effects, and sweeping scenes showing off the make-up artistry.

Obviously Johnny Depp was great and the pirate thing is a riot, but both of these can be seen in the first film. Kiera Knightly took centre stage in this film..*SIGH*...utterly unconvincing as a Pirate Queen. Knightly was out acted even by the planks of wood lining 'The Pearl'.

I won't be popular with this opinion...but someone's got to play Devil's Advocate.


0 comments, Reply to this entry


« Prev12 Next »