Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

An average movie

Posted : 5 years ago on 25 April 2019 08:44

Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I really struggled to get into this flick. I don’t know, maybe I wasn’t in the right mood but I didn’t really get what was so ‘fun’ or’ entertaining’ about seeing some evil kid killing a bunch of people. I have to admit that the cast was fine though and it is very rare to see some decent actors in a horror flick like this one. However, even if Vera Farmiga and Peter Sarsgaard had a decent chemistry, most of their decisions and actions were dictated by the plot and not by what these characters would actually choose to do. Anyway, there were just so many things that rubbed me in the wrong way. Basically, it is a movie that toys with the concept that, since you were not involved in the first years of an orphan, they can never really be trusted which is just an appalling idea. Furthermore, if you would believe this flick, you shouldn’t trust ‘weird’ kids and you should even be entitled to make fun of them since they could actually turn out be some psychotic killers. Finally, it was just ridiculous to see a shrink deliver a full psychological profile of her client after just one session. At least, I have to admit that the 3rd act was actually fairly entertaining and effective and the twist at the end was actually not bad but, still, most of the damned thing didn’t really work for me. Anyway, to conclude, even though I didn’t like it much, I have to admit that, in the evil kid genre, it might be one of the better movies I have seen so I guess it is worth a look if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 6 years, 2 months ago on 2 February 2018 12:52

Vera Farmiga performed well but the poor performance of Peter Sarsgaard ... disguised the character a lot boring ... we could have seen a greater participation of the hospital in history, Daniel died very early in history could have acted more during the film, helped the mother or detained the psycho girl and last and worst put a child firing a revolver. So much pretense and manipulation in the characters. Movie rating is up to level.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 7 years, 6 months ago on 3 October 2016 02:33

Orphan is the best movie EVER!!! Everything in this movie is great! They get what they want you to feel, the horror, the mystery, the suspicion... It keeps you glued to the seat from the beginning to the end!! The movie turns around a secret which is revealed at the end of the movie, that moment leaves you in SHOCK.
I have seen this movie a lot of times and it keeps surprising me!! Orphan is the most shocking movie I've ever seen!!


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 10 years, 2 months ago on 2 February 2014 09:24

Brilliant thriller! That film freaked me out, and it had very unpredictable scenes and situations. Camera work is done well, and the story seems really unique. A rare gem to behold around Hollywood filmmaking.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 11 years, 2 months ago on 10 February 2013 09:55

Even though it's not the case, Orphan to me seemed a very nice attempt at reviving the Hammer Horror banner. No other modern horror film has captivated me this strongly. It has almost become a ritual to cast a young / teen actress in either a high-school comedy or a horror film. Nearly every actress born in the late 80's / early-mid 90's has starred in the aforementioned genres, with only a relatively few coming out on top. Isabelle Fuhrman is one of the few. Prior this film, I always thought of Jodelle Ferland as the definitive modern young horror actress, due to her double role in Silent Hill. I guess she now has competition because Isabelle was truly frightening, convincing, and brilliant in her role as Esther, who, in a surprise twist, is not "little" as we're led to believe. Orphan has bought forward a great talent that - I hope - doesn't get tarnished and wasted by party-hopping and drug-pushing. Isabelle has now to me become the definitive face - alongside Jodelle - of modern horror movies which tend to have child stars in them. I wouldn't be surprised if she were to become a horror icon - either the actress or her character, doesn't matter.

Speaking of which, the utterly beautiful Vera Farmiga's - long lost sister of Madonna - character, Kate Coleman, has all the makings of a horror heroine. May not seem much in front of Sarah Connor and Ellen Ripley, but she suffers more than both of them, and manages to make her character interesting and quite-sympathetic. As far as scream queens are concerned, Vera's 30 second scream in the disturbing opening alone should make her one. From the 2000's, Kate - alongside Amanda Young from SAW and Emily Rose from The Exorcism of Emily Rose - is the definitive scream queen.

Story-wise the film is gripping, but slips awkwardly out of control sometimes. Some scenes really give off the feeling as if they're trying to go too far to scare you; as if unsure whether to put psychological tension in front or full front violence. I really enjoyed the pacing of the film but they could've done less with the uneasy suspense and more with the actual thriller. Not that it matters much. The tension is high and quite unsettling, but falls into the cliche hole at the end. It had little fire to it, little flair. Had it been more of a boom, more dramatic, more edgier, it would've worked, but instead they tried to imitate Carrie's iconic ending moment.

Performance-wise, Vera Farmiga and Isabelle Fuhrman won me for all the right reasons. Their chemistry was very convincing, although not altogether real. Peter Sarsgaard has never really impressed me with his performances. But then again I haven't seen him in many movies. In here he was quite good in his role, with all the correct expressions and all, but hardly great or amazing. Jimmy Bennett still has a long time to make his name known in Hollywood, but he won't be doing that if he keeps playing annoying characters / giving annoying performances. This is the 3rd or the 4th time I've seen him do the above two. Jimmy, grow up, go star in a musical or something. Aryana Engineer was so cute in her role as Max, a deaf-mute, and reluctant assistant to Ester. She and Isabelle really made a good pairing, and I'm hoping to see them together in another film!

In conclusion, I really loved Orphan, its suspense, its vulnerability - especially from Kate's side - and its unpredictability - especially from Esther's side, and the climax. It's not a very tight film but I enjoyed it all the same!

8.0/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 25 September 2010 12:05

To me this was the biggest surprise of the last couple years as far as genre works go. I still kinda can't believe Im recommending this film, but here goes: Everyone in this movie turns in a strong performance. The script is solid. Better than solid. Especially for a horror film. I really cared about the characters in this movie, so I really felt like there was a lot at stake, all the way through. And I never thought Id wanted see a little girl on film die as much as I did here. Forget what preconceptions you may have and give this movie a watch.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan

Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 11 September 2010 02:31

There's something wrong with ORPHAN. Actually, there are several things wrong with ORPHAN, none of which have anything to do with Vera Farmiga, who's too good of an actress to be stuck in a mediocre project like this. Unfortunately, though, this film essentially consists of nothing but Farmiga running around desperately trying to be believed by people who trust a weird kid's incredulous stories more than hers.

One of the biggest problems across the board in ORPHAN is in terms of editing. The transitions from one scene to another (and very often within scenes as well) are sometimes awkward, sometimes senseless and very often choppy. This prevents the film from having a nice narrative fluidity, but the problem gets even worse during the climax, which lacks all the suspenseful excitement that it might've had if the reels were handled with more finesse.

There's some occasional so-bad-it's-good fun to be had with ORPHAN. It's because of that that I would feel better if the film didn't make the completely unnecessary mistake of going over the 2-hour mark. This story could've easily been told in 90 minutes (as it often happens with horror films) without losing any important elements; in fact, a shorter running time may have made it easier to digest this as disposable entertainment.

Before the film starts, there's a disclaimer that warns people about the fact that ORPHAN is just a movie and that couples looking to adopt shouldn't let it dissuade them from doing so. I know this will make me sound pretty rude, but if a couple that wants to adopt actually starts having doubts about doing so after watching this movie, then I'm not so sure they'd be the best parents in the world, because it's beyond me how anyone could swallow the spree of implausibilities and exaggerations that are thrown at us during this film. Sure, the final twist assuages the disbelief towards the title character's overly precocious personality, but Esther's adult-like behavior is far from being the only outlandish element of this film. Also, I "love" how obvious it is that the final twist is revealed right after a rather perverse scene in which Esther behaves WAY too much like an adult. At that point, if the twist weren't revealed, outrage from the moral right may have been inevitable.

ORPHAN would've been wise to do a better job with its final chase sequences and with the way it wraps everything up. What the film chooses to do with the fates of its two male characters makes little sense: we don't find out what ultimately happens to one of them, and the fate of the other one is surprising but in a way that keeps the story from being able to have closure. Even worse, the end credits are tainted (literally) with some corny and poorly-shot footage that is meant to "sum up" everything we supposedly needed to know about our title character.

Fortunately, the end of this year will see both Vera Farmiga and Peter Sarsgaard starring in films that look to be much better than this sporadically engaging but ultimately unsatisfying "thriller" of sorts. Honestly, if you're thinking of adopting a kid, all this movie suggests is that it's PROBABLY a good idea for you to see the child naked at some point after adopting him/her, so that you can make sure that he/she is, um... normal. Surely that's something that adopting couples could figure out without having to subject themselves to watching ORPHAN.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 28 June 2010 12:41

I like the end of the film.
Very good!!!


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Orphan review

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 7 May 2010 08:30

That's the story of, that's the glory of love..

Brilliant. The subtle horror brought upon by a young girl gave the film an eerie and intense mood all throughout. At first, you wouldn't think that this film is worth tuppence, but as the events progress, each revelation gives you an idea of what the film is about. Frankly, it was one of the best films I've seen which features a child as the film's villain.
Kate (Farmiga) and John Coleman (Sarsgaard) are trying to cope with the loss of their baby daughter, Jessica, who died while she was still in Kate's womb, as well as John's infidelity (apparently he slept with their neighbor). In order to help themselves forget what happened in their past, they decide to adopt. While looking at the girls in the orphanage, John chances upon a girl softly singing while painting. Her name is Esther (Fuhrman), and she easily captures the hearts of Kate and John with her quiet wit, polite demeanor, and unquestionable charm. The first few days of Esther's stay in the Coleman house are peaceful, save for conflict arising between Esther and Daniel (Bennett), Kate and John's oldest child. When people around the Colemans are dying and/or getting hurt, Kate slowly suspects that the little girl she and John adopted isn't as innocent as she seems to be. Unfortunately, John doesn't see it that way, and this causes further friction between the husband and wife, especially when John finds two bottles of wine (Kate has been previously treated for alcoholism). Kate now has to fight for her family, as Esther's shocking past and true identity is revealed.
Fantastic. A horror movie does not need excess blood, guts, and other factors common to such films nowadays. All you need is a good twist (one that audiences would NEVER expect, an eerie atmosphere, and one helluva villain that scares the crap out of you. :p


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Generic, cliché-ridden suspense film

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 24 January 2010 11:20

"I have a special surprise for you, Mommy!"


In motion pictures, it's a widespread belief that children are the embodiment of pure evil. Perhaps not all kids are the spawn of Satan, but horror filmmakers realise that evil disguised behind the eyes of a seemingly innocent child is an effective way of amplifying the scare factor. Into this genre now steps 2009's Orphan. Instead of being an overly effective suspense piece, however, this is a predominantly boring, meandering film which suffers from repetition and poor scripting. If the creepy kid horror genre is in need of resuscitation, this subpar affair will not provide it.


The plot, in a nutshell, concerns Kate (Vera Farmiga) and John (Peter Sarsgaard). They're married with two kids, but Kate's recent miscarriage has put a strain on their relationship that's already burdened by John's infidelity and Kate's battle with alcoholic tendencies. Seeking to introduce a new child into their family, the couple decide to adopt. During a visit to the local orphanage, John connects with a strange yet astonishingly intelligent 9-year-old Russian girl named Esther (Isabelle Fuhrman). As you may or may not have guessed, Esther is no ordinary child, and seems to have been specially ordered from the Eastern European School of Creepy Kids. She distinguishes herself from those around her not only because she's mature beyond her years, but because she also appears trapped in a 19th Century time-warp with her fondness for Victorian doll dresses and ribbons. For her introductory scenes, Esther of course appears beguiling and innocent. Once she's adopted by John and Kate, the film then sets out to defy our preconceptions of how eerie and horrifying this little girl can be. And good heavens, is she creepy.


If it means anything - and in dealing with the consistently awful creepy kid subgenre, it likely does - Orphan is not the worst of its kind. It's atmospheric enough and contains a number of generally unsettling sequences, not to mention there's a solid attempt to delve into the characters' lives so that they comes across as more than blood-spurting automatons. Yet, in spite of these strengths, the film remains a ridiculous, by-the-numbers horror show. Spanish director Jaume Collet-Serra poorly orchestrates so many clichéd "boo!" moments designed to make the audience jump (such as mirror reveals), on top of faux scares in which a viewer believes they're about to jump but - surprise! - nothing's there. The repetition is irritating and laughable. These moments are hardly effective, too, since the music, with its rising disharmonies and sudden crashes, suggests there's a "scare" on the way. Orphan is also predictable from a narrative standpoint. It's easy to guess Esther's next move well before she makes it. And for the climax, the filmmakers call upon the most embarrassing genre convention imaginable: giving superhuman abilities to a weak character. At least the final showdown is relatively entertaining. Highly predictable, yet still satisfying nonetheless.


In addition to all this, the characters tend to act in whatever way serves the plot best. For example, it makes no sense for Kate and John to adopt Esther when she's clearly out of synch with the rest of the family. Furthermore, Kate is sometimes a raging alcoholic, but at other times an overly caring mother. Infidelity issues are raised in the first half, but they hardly surface again. At times, John is a trusting, loving husband and father, but at other times he's both ignorant and disloyal. Not to mention these characters are so stupid. What parents never see their child undress? What parents allow their child to skip dental appointments, and basically live in solitude in a mansion-like home? Why would no-one question Esther's ribbon accessories or her anti-social behaviour? Furthermore, John sets a new standard for Horror Movie Dumbass - he's bizarrely enamoured with this Russian girl (even when she rats him out for flirting with their neighbour!) and ignores his wife's desperate warnings. All of this is coupled with a major violation of Roger Ebert's main tenets for an unsuccessful narrative: if the main plot-point could be easily resolved - in this case, a mandatory medical examination should've been conducted by a state-run child protective services agency prior to approving the adoption - everything falls apart.


Credit where credit is due - in the acting department, things aren't too shabby at all. Vera Farmiga and Peter Sarsgaard share solid chemistry which makes their relationship believable. Isabelle Fuhrman is a terrific find: she's cute and charming, which makes her behaviour far more unsettling. The convincing Russian accent adds to her unnerving presence as well. For a horror movie of this type to boast such terrific performances is nothing short of a miracle. Yet, if one sets aside the solid acting, the interesting final plot twist, a few effective set-pieces and the fact it still works on a pretty basic level, Orphan remains a generic, cliché-ridden suspense film that strains credulity to breaking break. If you're in the midst of a strained marriage and are considering adopting a Soviet child, you may find this to be a terrific horror outing. As for everyone else...nah, it ain't worth the effort to get through these two distinctly mediocre hours.

4.9/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry


« Prev12 Next »