Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

The Final Destination review

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 12 October 2011 08:13

Like the previous 3, except this one involves a race track crash. Some scenes are pretty gruesome, especially the car wash seen and the pool scene, I give it credit for having pretty gnarly death scenes, but enough is enough now how many more of these are going to be made?!?


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Final Destination review

Posted : 12 years, 8 months ago on 31 August 2011 12:30

The director thinks he is orchestrating images and sequences of impact, but the film is a formulaic tedium atrocious! The characters are unconvincing and unbearable, mostly, and the script is absurd and increasingly bad! You can watch us fools when it comes to fun, but it is terribly absurd.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Final Destination review

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 17 May 2010 11:31

After watching all four Final Destination movies this was definitely the weakest of the series. The 3D aspect was a nice touch but it did little to mask the staleness and lack of new features for final destination fans. This movie is a carbon copy of the previous films in regards to the plot but it seemed to lack the suspense and interest that the previous movies provided. The deaths in this film lacked the buildup and suspense that the previous film had, and some of the deaths seemed thrown together hastily just to fill time. Having said that the movie is not horrible and is fairly interesting. If this was a stand alone movie or perhaps the first movie in the series I would have enjoyed it more. It just seemed like more of the same without any new elements that would keep the audience interested.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The Final Destination review

Posted : 14 years ago on 24 April 2010 06:32

Death saved... the best for last.

Not really. Frankly, out of all the FD films I've seen, I like this film the least. The deaths aren't as fanatical as the previous ones, although I did like the montage of some of the most popular deaths from the previous films. It's also one of the shortest FD films, and one which doesn't have the sinister presence of Tony Todd.
Four friends, Nick (Campo), his girlfriend Lori (VanSanten), Janet (Webb), and hotshot Hunt (Zano), are at a racetrack when Nick gets a vision of a car crash which ends up getting them all killed. In his hysteria, he and his friends, along with a handful of other people, get out of the racetrack and are saved. Or so they thought. After two of the people who supposedly would have died in the accident die in the same order they would have if they had stayed, Nick and his friends make the connection with that of the doomed Flight 180, which occurred years ago. Now, they have to find a way to break the chain before Death finally claims them as his own.
As much as I could see how much they wanted to keep this franchise alive, some of the deaths were.. well, not as sensational as the previous ones. I DID like the idea of having your guts sucked out from under your arse (that was probably my favorite in the film), but the rest... meh. Not crappy as compared to other horror films though. I just hope the people behind this franchise know when to stop, before they tarnish the reputation of the first two FD films.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

What's new?

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 5 January 2010 10:25

After witnessing a crash at a Nascar race and surviving, four teens must find out why, and who’s next to die.

Like all the other films in the series, one character can see into the future, and knows how someone will die. The only thing is, what order will they die in?


The first three Films in the Final Destination series were really good.
All the kills were laid out very well, and didn’t seem too cheesy in the process. That is if your into these kinds of movies, which I am a big fan of.

The newest installment entitled The Final Destination, is by far the weakest in the series, but still packs enough entertainment to enjoy (barely). If you care nothing about good acting and a thoughtful dialogue, then I suppose this movie is for you. But even then, people may have trouble sitting through this. There are plenty of interesting ways of dying shown in this film. Kind of like I’m watching A 1,000 ways to die, and while those killings may be a tad bit enjoyable, they got very old, very quick. You will probably feel like you've seen them all before, and predicting them from a couple miles away. However, there are a few that will smack you right across the face, and really surprise you.

I also noticed the special effects were no good in this one compared to the other three. The blood and kills all looked relatively fake. Which of course made the movie that much worse.

The main characters were just terrible. I felt nothing for any of them. While that was disappointing, it at the same came no surprise to me. Just your typical cliché idiotic characters. Maybe the couple wasn’t terrible, but the other two really ruined the chemistry. Most of the dialogue and actions of the characters were pulled right of the horror handbook 101.

If your looking for an enjoyable movie to watch with friends, or just something to entertain you whenever this might work for you. Though there’s a relatively high chance it will leave you disappointed.

4.9/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

More of the same, only in 3-D

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 19 October 2009 12:50

"We're all gonna die, right? There's gonna be a crash!"


Sequel-camouflaging title notwithstanding, The Final Destination is the fourth instalment of the now 9-year-old horror series wherein the Grim Reaper eviscerates those who have avoided their predestined death. By this point in the franchise, one would hope for the filmmakers to finally tweak the time-worn formula (perhaps explore the source of the premonitions, or place the action somewhere more exciting) but if someone pitched this idea to the studio executives, they were outvoted...this fourth film follows the formula to the letter without deviation. The sole element that has been changed is the visuals, which are now in 3-D (meaning blood, sharp objects and viscera are thrown at your face). The Final Destination does get credit for cutting straight to the chase; brushing aside both story and characterisation to plunge straight into the delightful gore. But the film is too rote, and it's handled weakly by those involved who were clearly more interested in box office returns than refreshing genre creativity.


For those unfamiliar with the three prior movies (released in 2000, 2003 and 2006), the recurring set-up is exceedingly simple: a group of characters are supposed to die in a terrible accident, but they survive because one of them has a premonition of said accident, and they escape before it actually happens. While this would logically suggest that they've been given a second chance, it isn't long before the Grim Reaper returns to claim the souls of those who evaded his scythe. Thus, The Final Destination commences with a group of four friends attending a NASCAR event. One of them, Nick (Campo), experiences the obligatory vision of a crash so implausibly epic that it causes a series of explosions and results in the death of dozens...including those of himself and his friends. Since his vision was so vivid, Nick is sent into a turbulent panic, and frantically attempts to leave the venue. He and a number of people do so, which leaves a motley assortment of survivors who must now navigate the dangerous waters of life-after-averted-death. The Grim Reaper spends the next 70 minutes of the film re-killing the survivors in meticulous ways.


Inexplicably, the main characters are very quickly able to figure out that the spirit of doom is hunting them - they just know purely because it's in the screenplay (though the word "Google" is uttered by one of the characters in a half-hearted attempt to justify their knowledge). Like its predecessors, The Final Destination does contain vague notions of expanding upon the mythology of the series, but there's minuscule effort on the part of the filmmakers to go through with it.
What was the source of Nick's premonition? Not important enough to explore, it seems. Why does Nick continue to experience premonitions which detail how the next survivor will die? No-one involved had an interest in addressing that either. The Final Destination is virtually a carbon copy of the preceding films, except that it's packaged in digital 3-D and eschews a numerical affix in favour of a definitive "the" in the title to suggest it is the final destination...unless, of course, the cash registers ring hard and often enough to warrant another follow-up.


Director David R. Ellis (a former stuntman-turned-director) makes his return to the director's chair after having helmed the second movie, which was arguably superior to the first (X-Files alumni James Wong co-wrote and directed the first & third instalments). In terms of delivering what the series promises, Ellis doesn't disappoint; beginning the film with a suitably horrific and spectacular disaster that kills dozens of people. And taking the ride in 3-D - which is undoubtedly the most enjoyable way to experience The Final Destination - makes the sequence extremely spectacular. Beyond this opening action set-piece, however, Ellis is unable to electrify the material - he merely ticks off sequences one by one, concentrating more on shock value due to gore as opposed to intoxicating tension. The kill scenes - while enjoyable and occasionally gripping - are still far too elaborate to be believed. Domino effect situations like these are too unbelievable, especially in such bulk. With lack of suspense and with originality at an all-time low, it seems the filmmaker utilised the 3-D gimmick as an excuse to get lazy. At least the film manages to sustain a viewer's attention for its short 80-minute duration - there's certainly minimal downtime between the unapologetically brutal kill scenes that define these movies.


Another problem with The Final Destination is that the characters are flat. Yes, it's incredibly rash to expect decent characterisations in a slasher flick, but the previous Final Destination films at least explored the basic backgrounds of the protagonists. A number of the main characters in this film, however, make absolutely no sense as people - they are apparently post-college and in their mid-20s, yet they don't appear to have a job to fund their comfortable lifestyle...they just inhabit an apartment and try mightily not to get killed. Tension for the most part relies on a viewer's ability to care for the characters, but with personality-deficient people within the movie, who really cares if they live or die? (As a side note, some of the characters in the prior Final Destination films were named after horror icons. This is unfortunately not retained here.)


The acting is expectedly awful. Every single performer is generic, especially Bobby Campo who brings scarcely a modicum of intensity to his premonition-receiving character. Shantel VanSanten and Haley Webb are fairly interchangeable with the previous Final Destination starlets (they're gorgeous, have great bodies, and are instantly forgettable), while David Webb appears as the requisite jerk (who's dismissive of the whole concept that Death is out to get them). Obviously it's daft to expect decent acting when dealing with unfussy horror mechanics, but the ensemble often fails to provide requisite anxiety...they appear to look upon death as a mild nuisance akin to a lengthy red light.


The Final Destination would be a terrible movie (even as far as horror sequels go) if it weren't for its sense of humour, which constantly reminds a viewer that the filmmakers were self-aware of how ridiculous the whole thing is. A scene in which a racist redneck is dragged to his fiery death after attempting to plant a burning cross in an African American man's yard is given an extra touch in the form of the car stereo blaring the song Why Can't We Be Friends? as it unfolds. The climax is set in a movie theatre primed to explode while playing a 3-D movie that features a ticking time-bomb (which is actually footage from The Long Kiss Goodnight).


Whether the "more of the same, only in 3-D" approach to The Final Destination will satisfy you depends entirely on your taste. While this reviewer would have liked to see the filmmakers mine other thematic areas, there's still enough popcorn entertainment here to warrant a watch.

5.1/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Don't Go To The Track!!

Posted : 14 years, 8 months ago on 29 August 2009 04:12

The fourth and latest in the series of the Final Destinations, where another person with the ability to sneak peek into the action and devastation which will occur in the near future and claim the lives of him and his friends avoids the tragedy and lives to see another day.... but how many more days will he and his friends see? Director David R. Ellis returns from his role (in directing the second film) to bring Nick O'Bannon's character forth as the main person who witnesses violent deaths; not only to the many people who had died in the raceway arena on that awful afternoon, but to the people who were supposed to die in that accident as well after the event took place. This chapter fits very well into the film series, and is worth seeing in 3D; alot of steel and other metals pop through organs and skin and come RIGHT AT YOU!! The deaths were all set up nicely, a couple having the few scares before it actually happens; kind of what the viewer would like to happen, but doesn't. The entire saloon scene will keep you with your eyes open, fearing to blink and miss a second of what "could" happen.

Lori: Janet we have to go!
Janet: No you guys are nuts! I was meant to see this movie!


0 comments, Reply to this entry