Dracula update feed
"2010: 515 2008: 483 2007: 465 2006: 452 2005: 440 2004: 429 2003: 440 First seen in 1998"
"2008: 483 2007: 465 2006: 452 2005: 440 2004: 429 2003: 440 First seen in 1998"
"2008: 483 2007: 465 2006: 452 2005: 440 2004: 429 2003: 440 "
"2007: 465 2006: 452 2005: 440 2004: 429 2003: 440 "
"September 22nd Directed by: Tod Browning 2nd Viewing Previous Rating: 3.5 After: 3.5 -"
"3.2 Bela Lugosin Draculaa ovat monet haukkuneet jälkikäteen hidastempoiseksi ja tylsäksi klassikoksi. Yhdyn itsekin tähän, sillä kyseessä on yksi yliarvostetuimmista kauhuklassikoista. Tämähän on enemmän vain teatterisovitus siirrettynä valkokankaalle, kuin mikään kokonainen elokuvaversio. Itse Bela Lugosi toimii Draculana, vaikkei yhtä karmiva olekaan kuin Max Schreckin kreivi Orlok alkuperäisessä Nosferatussa. Jotenkin miehen olemus ja tuima katse antaa juuri riittävän hien"
"Re-watch - Dec. 16th Bela Lugosi double-feature I don't own any Ed Wood movies, but why watch them when I can see Bela at his best? I didn't initially plan to watch both films together, but Ed Wood really made me want to watch something with Bela in it and Dracula seemed like the best option. His performance really makes the film worth watching, and Dwight Frye goes above and beyond to bring Renfield to life. The rest of the cast is fine, and my main complaint with this film still lies with the"
"1931's Dracula is considered a classic, but it wasn't very good really. 1958's Hammer version "The Horror of Dracula" and 1992's "Bram Stoker's Dracula" are both better. There have been scads of other adaptations. Some are good and some are bad. "
"When: October 27th First-Time Viewing: Yes. How: DVD from the library. What'd I Think?: Iconic Horror classic is dated, but still creepy. My Rating: 8/10 Other Notes: NA."
"Me encanta la atmósfera y la actuación, pero la historia y eso no me atrapó."